Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:32:08.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Botanical Identification of Archaeological Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S. G. Stephens
S. G. Stephens*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cotton plant parts recovered from archaeological sites usually consist of cordage and textile fragments, raw cotton, boll segments, and seeds. All of these can be readily identified as cotton, but much less easily as particular species of cotton. Some possibilities for obtaining a more precise botanical identification are presented. Peduncles (i.e., the stalks to which the bolls are attached in living material) might be particularly useful for identification purposes.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 1970 , pp. 367 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, J. and Mahler, J. 1951 America’s oldest cotton fabrics. American Fabrics 20:73–78.Google Scholar
Firschein, I. L. 1961 Population dynamics of the sickle-cell trait in the Black Caribs of British Honduras, Central America. American Journal of Human Genetics 13:233–254.Google Scholar
Gulati, A. M., and Turner, A. J. 1928 A note on the early history of cotton. Indian Central Cotton Committee Technical Laboratory Bulletin 17.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. B., Silow, R. A., and Stephens, S. G. 1947 The evolution of Gossypium. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lanning, E. P. 1967 Peru before the Incas. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pickersgill, B. 1969 The archaeological record of chili peppers (Capsicum spp.) and the sequence of plant domestication in Peru. American Antiquity 34:54–61.Google Scholar
Rouse, I. 1964 Prehistory of the West Indies. Science 144:499–513.Google Scholar
Silow, R. A. 1941 The comparative genetics of Gossypium anomalum and the cultivated Asiatic Cottons. Journal of Genetics 42:259–358.Google Scholar
Smith, C. E., and MacNeish, R. S. 1964 Antiquity of American polyploid cottons. Science 143:675–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. E., and Stephens, S. G. n.d. Critical identification of Mexican archaeological cotton remains. Economic Botany (In Press).Google Scholar
Stephens, S. G. 1963 Polynesian cottons. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 50:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, S. G. 1967a Evolution under domestication of the New World Cottons (Gossypium spp.) . Ciencia e cultura 19:118–134.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. G. 1967b A cotton boll segment from Coxcatlan cave. In The pre-history of the Tehuacan Valley Vol. 1:256–260. Edited by Douglas S. Byers, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar