Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T13:40:28.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Borrowed Concepts: A Comment on Rhoades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Douglas M. Davy
Douglas M. Davy*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rhoades’ critique of the ecotone and edge effect concepts is discussed. While his conclusions about archaeological misuse of these terms are insightful, the assessment of their status in ecology and wildlife management is challenged. These constructs can be put to better use if substantive limits of their definitions are clear. More importantly, archaeologists should decide which aspects of environmental variability are meaningful to human adaptation before using them.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 346 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Burger, G. V. 1973 Practical wildlife management. Winchester, New York.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. T. 1959 The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Davison, V. 1946 False principles delay advancement in wildlife techniques. Journal of Wildlife Management 10:296–299.Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. 1966 The pattern of animal communities. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Klimstra, W. D., and Roseberry, J. L. 1975 Nesting ecology of the bobwhite in Southern Illinois. Wildlife Monographs 41.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. C. 1972 Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Moen, A. N. 1973 i>Wildlife ecology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Naumov, N. P. 1972 The ecology of animals, edited by Levine, N. D., translated by Pious, F.K. Jr., University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Odum, Eugene P. 1959 Fundamentals of ecology (second ed.). Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1974 Population and community ecology: principles and methods. Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1975 Ecological diversity. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Rhoades, R. E. 1978 Archaeological use and abuse of ecological concepts and studies: the ecotone example. American Antiquity 43:608–614.Google Scholar
Short, H. L., Evans, W., and Boerer, E. L. 1977 The use of natural and modified pinyon-juniper woodlands by deer and elk. Journal of Wildlife Management 41:543–559.Google Scholar
Voigt, J., and Mohlenbrock, R. 1964 Plant communities of southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1967 Gradient analysis of vegetation. Cambridge Philosophical Society Biological Reviews 42:207–264.Google Scholar