Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:49:50.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Beginnings of Teotihuacán*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

René Millon
René Millon*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The problem of the age of the pyramids of the Sun and Moon at Teotihuacán is considered in the light of evidence from an extensive and hitherto unreported Tzacualli or Teotihuacán I occupation to the northwest of the Pyramid of the Moon. Material from a small excavation in this new zone is commented upon briefly. Previous analyses of the age of the pyramids are discussed in the context of the new evidence, the conclusion being that the Pyramid of the Sun and probably also the Pyramid of the Moon were built in the earliest phase of the occupation of Teotihuacán rather than later as commonly assumed. The relationships of the Tzacualli phase to other sites in the Valley of Mexico are discussed and it is concluded that the pyramids were probably built in about the last century before Christ or earlier. Since the building of these enormous pyramids implies a relatively complex level of social integration, this new level must have come into being some several hundred years or more before the building of the pyramids unless a large-scale migration was involved. For this it is contended there is no good evidence. Linné's new chronological placement of Tlamimilolpa before Xolalpan rather than after is discussed. Comments are made on the significance of this reversal of chronology for the growth of the city and for the expansion of its “influence” to other parts of Mesoamerica.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , July 1960 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Since this paper was written, more extensive investigations of the Oztoyahualco zone have been made. A number of mounds and exposed structures in the zone have been mapped and further excavations were carried out in the South Platform of Plaza 1. The northwest corner of the city has been located and more is now known about the extent and nature of the occupation of this zone than is indicated in this paper. A major extension of the city to the southeast was also discovered. In addition, investigations were carried on in the tunnels within the Pyramid of the Sun which have added to our knowledge concerning this structure. Analysis of this material has not yet been completed.

References

Armillas, Pedro 1944. Exploraciones recientes en Teotihuacán, México. Cuadernos Americanos, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 121–36. Mexico.Google Scholar
Armillas, Pedro 1950. Teotihuacan, Tula y los Toltecas: Las culturas post-arcáicas y pre-aztecas del centro de México. Excavaciones y estudios, 1922–50. Runa, Vol. 3, Parts 1–2, pp. 37–70. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Brainerd, G. W. 1954. Maya Civilization. Southwest Museum. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cook de Leonard, Carmen 1952. Notas del Interior. Tlatoani, Vol. 3–4, p. 49. Mexico.Google Scholar
Cook de Leonard, Carmen 1957. Excavaciones en la plaza #1, “Tres Palos,” Teotihuacán. Boletín del Centro de Investigaciones Antropológicas de México, No. 4, pp. 3–5. Mexico.Google Scholar
Gamio, Manuel 1922. La Población del Valle de Teotihuacán, 3 volumes. Secretaría de Agricultura y Fomento, Dirección de Antropología. Mexico.Google Scholar
García Payón, José 1953. ¿Qué es lo Totonaco? In “Huastecos, Totonacos y sus Vecinos,” edited by Bernal, Ignacio and H., Eusebio Dávalos, pp. 379–87. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos, Vol. 13, Nos. 2–3. Mexico.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Bennyhoff, J. A. 1958. Archeological Investigation of Cuicuilco, Valley of Mexico, 1957. Science, Vol. 127, No. 3292, pp. 232–3. Washington.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V., Jennings, J. D., and Shook, E. M. 1946. Excavations at Kaminaljuyu, Guatemala. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 561. Washington.Google Scholar
Linné, Sigvald 1934. Archaeological Researches at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Ethnographic Museum of Sweden, n.s., Publication 1. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Linné, Sigvald 1942. Mexican Highland Cultures. Ethnographic Museum of Sweden, n.s., Publication 7. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Linné, Sigvald 1956. Radiocarbon Dates in Teotihuacan. Ethnos, Vol. 21, Nos. 3–4, pp. 180–93. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Marquina, Ignacio 1951. Arquitectura prehispánica. Memorias del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, No. 1. Mexico.Google Scholar
Medellín Zenil, Alfonso 1953. Secuencia cronológico-cultural en el centro de Veracruz. In “Huastecos, Totonacos y sus Vecinos,” edited by Bernal, Ignacio and H., Eusebio Davalos, pp. 371–8. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos, Vol. 13, Nos. 2–3. Mexico.Google Scholar
Medellín Zenil, Alfonso 1955. Desarrollo de la cultura prehispánica central veracruzana. Anales del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Vol. 7, No. 36, pp. 101–10. Mexico.Google Scholar
Millon, René 1957. New Data on Teotihuacan I in Teotihuacan. Boletín del Centro de Investigaciones Antropológicas de México, No. 4, pp. 12–17. Mexico.Google Scholar
Noguera, Eduardo 1935. Antecedentes y Relaciones de la Cultura Teotihuacana. El México Antiguo, Vol. 3, Nos. 5–8, pp. 3–90, 93–5. Mexico.Google Scholar
Noguera, Eduardo and Leonard, Juan 1957. Descubrimiento de la Casa de las Aguilas en Teotihuacan. Boletín del Centro de Investigaciones Antropológicas de México, No. 4, pp. 6–9. Mexico.Google Scholar
Pérez, J. B. 1935. Exploración del Túnel de la Pirámide del Sol. El México Antiguo, Vol. 3, Nos. 5–8, pp. 91–2. Mexico.Google Scholar
Pina Chán, Román 1955. Las Culturas Preclásicas de la Cuenca de México. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Mexico.Google Scholar
Pina Chán, Román 1958. Tlatilco. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Investigaciones, No. 1. Mexico.Google Scholar
Porter, M. N. 1956. Excavations at Chupícuaro, Guanajuato. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., Vol. 46, Part 5. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T. 1956. The Central Mexican Symbiotic Region: A Study in Prehistoric Settlement Patterns. In “Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the New World,” edited by Willey, G. R., pp. 115–27. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 23. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, New York.Google Scholar
Shook, E. M. and Kidder, A. V. 1952. Mound E–III–3, Kaminaljuyu, Guatemala. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 596, Contributions to American Anthropology and History, No. 53. Washington.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Paul 1958. Surface Survey of the Northern Valley of Mexico: The Classic and Post-Classic Periods. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., Vol. 48, Part 5. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G. C. 1931. Excavations at Ticoman. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 32, Part 2. New York.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G. C. 1938. A Correlation of Archaeological and Historical Sequences in the Valley of Mexico. American Anthropologist, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 535–73. Menasha.Google Scholar
Wauchope, Robert 1950. A Tentative Sequence of Pre-Classic Ceramics in Middle America. Middle American Research Institute, Publication No. 15, pp. 211–50, Middle American Research Records, Vol. 1, No. 14, Tulane University, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. and Phillips, Philip 1958. Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar