Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:58:45.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeological Notes on a Midden at Point Sal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

George F. Carter*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California

Extract

Point Sal is 50 miles north of Santa Barbara, and represents a seaward projection of the Casmalia Hills. Two and a half miles inland from the sea, at an elevation of 1100 feet, there occurs a large flowing spring. On the bench below this spring there is an extensive shell midden of the general type described by D. B. Rogers for the area south of here. Excavation on this site was limited to four small test pits and to the removal of a group of burials from the upper level. The test pits showed a maximum depth of 10 feet near the center, and a thinning towards the edges. Three principal strata were observed, and will be designated as numbers I, II, III, numbering from the bottom up.

Stratum number I was two feet thick. It was of a brown color, of a clayey textured soil streaked with lime. Its shell and ash content was the lowest of the three. Stratum number II was grey colored.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper was read at the meeting of the Pacific Division of the A.A.A. at San Diego, June 20-22, 1938. It embodies the results of work done while the author was an assistant curator at the San Diego Museum. It is published with the kind permission of Mr. Malcolm J. Rogers, curator of that museum.

References

Harrington, M. R. 1934. “Once in a Lifetime—Perhaps!Southwest Museum Masterkey. Vol. 8, pp. 177178.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. 1938. “The Plank Canoe of the Santa Barbara Region, California.” Etnologiska Studier. Vol. 7. Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. 1939. “Some Sacramento Valley-Santa Barbara Archeaological Relationships.” Southwest Museum Masterkey. Vol. 13, pp. 3135.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Fenenga, F. 1939. “Archaeological Horizons in Central California.” American Anthropologist. Vol. 41, pp. 348399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Hewes, G. W. 1940. “Animal Ceremonialism in Central California in the Light of Archaeology.” American Anthropologist. Vol. 42, pp. 587603.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology. Bulletin 78.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1936. “Prospects in California Prehistory.” American Antiquity, Vol. 2, pp. 108116.Google Scholar
Lillard, J. B., Heizer, R. F. and Fenenga, F. 1939. An Introduction to the Archaeology of Central California. Sacramento Junior College, Dept. of Anthropology. Bulletin 2.Google Scholar
Olson, R. L. 1930. “Chumash Prehistory.” University of California. Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. Vol. 28, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. B. 1929. Prehistoric Man on the Santa Barbara Coast. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. J. 1929. “The Stone Art of the San Dieguito Plateau.” American Anthropologist. Vol. 31, pp. 454467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Geographical Surveys West of the 100th Meridian. 1879. Archaeology. Vol. VII, Plate IV. No. 7.Google Scholar
United States Geographical Surveys West of the 100th Meridian. 1879. Archaeology. Vol. VII, Plate IV. No. 7.Google Scholar