Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T05:21:39.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kurt E. Dongoske ,
Michael Yeatts ,
Roger Anyon  and
T. J. Ferguson
Kurt E. Dongoske
Affiliation:
Cultural Preservation Office, The Hopi Tribe, P.O. Box 123, Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039
Michael Yeatts
Affiliation:
Cultural Preservation Office, The Hopi Tribe, P.O. Box 123, Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039
Roger Anyon
Affiliation:
Heritage Resources Management Consultants, 3227 North Walnut Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85712
T. J. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Heritage Resources Management Consultants, 5000 West Placita de los Vientos, Tucson, AZ 85745
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeologists and Native Americans apply different concepts to classify ancient groups of people who lived in the past. This is a topic of current interest because many archaeologists in the United States are now having to determine the cultural affiliation of the materials they study to comply with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The Hopi and Zuni tribes in the American Southwest are used as case examples to examine how and why archaeological and tribal views of cultural affiliation are divergent. We suggest anthropological perspectives of culture need to be reintegrated into archaeological theory in collaboration with Native Americans in order to interpret the past in a manner that is both useful and interesting to the multiple audiences interested in our work.

Los arqueólogos y los indios norteamericanos aplican diferentes conceptos para clasificar los grupos humanos que vivieron en el pasado. Este es un tópico de interés actual debido a que muchos arqueólogos hoy tienen que determinar la afiliación cultural de los materiales que ellos estudian para así acatar la ley, Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). Se utilizan los casos de las tribus Hopi y Zuni cómo ejemplos para examinar cómo y por que las perspectivas arqueológicas y tribales son divergentes. Se sugiere que las perspectivas antropológicas de cultura necesitan ser reintegradas en la teoría arqueológica en colaboración con los indios norteamericanos para interpretar el pasado de una manera útil e interesante para la variada audiencia interesada en nuestro trabajo.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , October 1997 , pp. 600 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ahlstrom, R. V. N., Purcell, D. E., Zyniecki, M., Gilpin, D. A., 1993 An Archaeological Overview of Grand Canyon National Park. SWCA, Inc., Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Anyon, R., Ferguson, T. J., Jackson, L., Lane, L., and Vicenti, P. 1997 Native American Oral Tradition and Archaeology: Issues of Structure, Relevance, and Respect. In Native Americans and Archaeologists, Stepping Stones to Common Ground, edited by Swidler, N., Dongoske, K. E., Anyon, R., and Downer, A. S., pp. 77–87. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Binford, S. R., and Binford, L. R. 1968 New Perspectives in Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bunzel, R. 1932 Zuni Origin Myths. In 47th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1929-1930, pp. 545–609. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Cushing, F. H. 1890 Preliminary Notes on the Origin, Working Hypotheses, and Primary Researches of the Hemenway Southwestern Expedition. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Americanists, pp. 151–193. International Congress of Americanists, Berlin.Google Scholar
Cushing, F. H. 1896 Outlines of Zuni Creation Myths. In 13th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1891-1892, pp. 321–447. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Dongoske, K., Ferguson, T. J., and Jenkins, L. 1993 Understanding the Past through Hopi Oral History. Native Peoples Magazine 6(2): 24–31.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. J., and Dongoske, K. 1994 Navajo Transmission Project EIS: Hopi Ethnographic Overview. Produced by the Hopi Cultural Preservation Office in association with the Institute of the NorthAmerican West, Tucson, Arizona. Report on file at the Hopi Cultural Preservation Office, Kykotsmovi, Arizona.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. J., and Hart, E. R. 1985 A Zuni Atlas. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1896 The Prehistoric Culture of Tusayan. American Anthropologist 9: 151—144.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1898a Preliminary Account of an Expedition to the Pueblo Ruins Near Winslow, Arizona, in 1896. Annual Report 1896, pp. 517–540. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1898b Archeological Expedition to Arizona in 1895. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1895-1896 17: 519–742. Part 2. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1900 Tusayan Migration Traditions. In Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1897-1898 19: 573–634. Part 2. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W. 1909 Antiquities of the Mesa Verde National Park, Spruce Tree House. Bulletin No. 41. Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Gladwin, H. S. 1957 A History of the Ancient Southwest. Bond Wheelright Company, Portland, Maine.Google Scholar
Gladwin, H. S., Haury, E. W., Sayles, E. B., and Gladwin, N. 1937 Excavations at Snaketown, 1: Material Culture. Medallion Papers No. 25. Gila Pueblo, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Gladwin, W., and Gladwin, H. S. 1934 A Method for the Designation of Cultures and Their Variations, Medallion Papers No. 15, Gila Pueblo, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1936 The Mogollon Culture of Southwestern New Mexico. Gila Pueblo, Medallion Papers No. 20. Gila Pueblo, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1958 Evidence at Point of Pines for a Prehistoric Migration from Northern Arizona. In Migrations in New World Culture History, edited by Thompson, R. H., pp. 1–6. Bulletin No. 29(2), Social Science Bulletin No. 27. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1985 Mogollon Culture in the Forestdale Valley, East-central Arizona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hill, J. N. 1970 Broken K Pueblo: Prehistoric Social Organization in the American Southwest. Anthropological Papers No. 18. University of Arizona. Tucson.Google Scholar
Hough, W. 1907 Antiquities of the Upper Gila and Salt River Valleys in Arizona and New Mexico. Bulletin No. 35. Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Jenkins, L. 1994 Hopi Navotiat… Hopi Knowledge of History: Hopi Presence on Black Mesa. Manuscript on file with the Hopi Cultural Preservation Office, Kykotsmovi, Arizona.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V. 1927 Southwestern Archaeological Conference. Science 66: 486–491.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V. 1936 Speculations on New World Prehistory. In Essays in Anthropology Presented to Alfred L. Kroeber, edited by Lowie, R. H., pp. 143–152. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lekson, S.H. 1988 The Idea of the Kiva in Anasazi Archaeology. Kiva 53: 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longacre, W. A. 1970 Archaeology as Anthropology: A Case Study. Anthropological Papers No. 17. University of Arizona, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, J. C. 1977 Southwestern Archaeology 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S., and Rinaldo, J. B. 1947 The SU Site: Excavations at a Mogollon Village, Western New Mexico. Anthropological Series No. 32(3). Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S., and Rinaldo, J. B. 1960 Table Rock Pueblo, Arizona. Fieldiana: Anthropology Vol. 51(2). Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S., and Rinaldo, J. B. 1961 Mineral Creek Site and Hooper Ranch Pueblo. Fieldiana: Anthropology Vol. 52. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Mindeleff, V. 1891 A Study of Pueblo Architecture in Tusayan and Cibola. In Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology 8: 3–228. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Nequatewa, E. 1967 Truth of a Hopi. Reprint. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Pepper, G. H. 1902 The Ancient Basket Makers of Southeastern Utah. Journal of the American Museum of Natural History 2(4). Supplement.Google Scholar
Plog, F. 1979 Prehistory: Western Anasazi. In Southwest, edited by Ortiz, A., pp. 108–130. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 9, Sturtevant, William C., general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Reed, E. K. 1950 Eastern-Central Arizona Archaeology in Relation to the Western Pueblos. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 6(2): 120–138.Google Scholar
Stanislawski, M. B. 1979 Hopi-Tewa. In Southwest, edited by Ortiz, A., pp. 587–602. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 9, Sturtevant, William B., general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. C. 1904 The Zuni Indians, Their Mythology, Esoteric Fraternities, and Ceremonies. In Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology 23: 1–634. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Teague, L. S. 1993 Prehistory and the Traditions of the O'Odham and Hopi. Kiva 58: 435–54.Google Scholar
Tsosie, R. 1997 Indigenous Rights and Archaeology. In Native Americans and Archaeologists, Stepping Stones to Common Ground, edited by Swidler, N., Dongoske, K. E., Anyon, R., and Downer, A. S., pp. 64–76. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Vansina, J. 1985 Oral Tradition as History. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar