Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:49:34.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Archaeological Indicator of Matrilocal versus Patrilocal Residence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Melvin Ember
Melvin Ember*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, Cuny
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growing willingness among archaeologists to draw inferences about cultural behavior is offset by the almost total lack of research that shows how ethnographic and archaeological phenomena are correlated. If ethnologists and archaeologists are to do complementary research on the same problems of cultural process and variation, we must try to explore, systematically and comparatively, how the behavioral and material realms may be correlated. The present paper offers an example of such research. I describe the design and results of a cross-cultural study that suggests an archaeological indicator of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. Briefly, it appears from 2 separate random samples of ethnographically described societies that matrilocal versus patrilocal residence can be simply and accurately predicted from the living floor area of the average house in the society.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 1973 , pp. 177 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert McC. 1968 Archeological research strategies: past and present. Science 160:1187–1192.Google Scholar
Binford, Sally R., and Lewis R., Binford, eds. 1968 New perspectives in archeology. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Deetz, James 1965 The dynamics of stylistic change in Arikara ceramics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Ember, Carol R., and Melvin Ember, 1973 The conditions favoring multilocal residence, xeroxed. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology (in press).Google Scholar
Ember, Melvin 1967 The emergence of neolocal residence. New York Academy of Sciences, Transactions, 30:291–302.Google Scholar
Ember, Melvin, and Carol R., Ember 1971 The conditions favoring matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. American Anthropologist 73:571–594.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. 1967 Culture history v. culture process: a debate in American archaeology. Scientific American 217:2:119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Morton H. 1968 Review of three books on prehistoric art. Science 161:150–152.Google Scholar
Longacre, William A. 1964 Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. Science 144:1454–1455.Google Scholar
Murdock, George P. 1949 Social structure. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Murdock, George P. 1967 Ethnographic atlas: a summary. Ethnology 6:109–236.Google Scholar
Naroll, Raoul 1962 Floor area and settlement population. American Antiquity 27:587–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar