Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:04:34.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shattered Expectations? George Fox, the Quakers, and the Restoration State, 1660-1685*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Richard L. Greaves
Get access

Extract

The prevailing view of Quakers in the Restoration era depicts them as a defeated movement no longer on the attack but henceforth under siege. They institutionalized, in the words of Richard Bauman, a strategy “of disengagement from the world's affairs” and embraced “a social policy founded on quietism.” Defeated politically, they were forced, according to this view, to relinquish their efforts to advance the cause of liberty “by militant, political means.” Thus the adoption of the peace principle as a hallmark of the Society of Friends emerged, according to Barry Reay, as a response to political defeat and as a stratagem for survival. This interpretation of Restoration Quakerism is similar in many respects to the stereotypical depiction of the Friends in terms of withdrawal and quiescence. I would like to suggest some modifications in this view by reexamining Quaker expectations at the Restoration, the Friends' involvement in political and legal matters, and the emergence and enforcement of the peace principle. The dominant characteristics of Restoration Quakerism are not withdrawal and quiescence but engagement and vigor.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , Summer 1992 , pp. 237 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A slightly modified version of this paper was presented as a plenary address to the George Fox tercentenary conference at the University of Lancaster, April 1991. I am grateful to J. William Frost, Michael Mullett, Ted Underwood, and Robert Zaller for their suggestions.

References

1 Bauman, Richard, Let Your Words Be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence Among Seventeenth-Century Quakers (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 118–19Google Scholar; Hill, Christopher, The Experience of Defeat: Milton and Some Contemporaries (New York, 1984), ch. 5Google Scholar; Cole, W. A., “The Quakers and Politics, 1652-1660” (Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge, 1955)Google Scholar; Reay, Barry, The Quakers and the English Revolution (London, 1985), pp. 106-107, 121Google Scholar. Reay, however, admits that “not all Quakers withdrew into their tents, and those who did still ventured forth from time to time” (ibid., p. 107).

2 George Fox the Younger, A Noble Salutation (London, 1660), p. 8Google Scholar. In February 1660, on the eve of the Restoration, Henry Fell expressed hope that the “powers of darknesse,” which were predominant in London, would soon be overthrown by God (Library of the Religious Society of Friends, London, Catón MSS, 3: 85 [hereafter cited as LF]).

3 Fell, Margaret, A Declaration and an Information (London, 1660), p. 6Google Scholar; Crane, Richard, A Fore-Warning (London, 1660), p. 5Google Scholar; Salthouse, Thomas, A Candle Lighted at a Coal from the Altar (London, 1660), p. 20Google Scholar; [Burrough, Edward], A Visitation and Presentation of Love (London, 1660), p. 6Google Scholar; Fox, George, To Those That Have Been Formerly in Authority (London, 1660)Google Scholar, passim. In the latter work, Fox also chided the established clergy: “Will not the Priests pray for the KING now, as fast as they prayed against him, for the PARLIAMENT, to keep their benefices, who once prayed against him?” (pp. 3-4).

4 Burrough, , A Visitation, pp. 10-13, 24–25Google Scholar.

5 Ibid., p. 4; Fox the Younger, , Noble Salutation, p. 3Google Scholar; Fell, Henry, in The Copies of Several Letters, Which Were Delivered to the King (London, 1660), p. 21Google Scholar [hereafter cited as Copies].

6 Fox the Younger, , Noble Salutation, pp. 9, 17Google Scholar. Cf. Fox, George, An Epistle General to Them Who Are of the Royal Priest-hood (London, 1660), p. 14Google Scholar.

7 LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 3, fol. 136r; vol. 1, fol. 170r.

8 J[ohn] P[ennyman], ad cat. Bishop, George, To Thee Charts Stuart King of England (Bristol, 1660), p. 4Google Scholar.

9 Salthouse, , A Candle, pp. 5, 23Google Scholar; Smith, William, in Copies, p. 41Google Scholar; Sowter, John, in Copies, p. 29Google Scholar; Fox, , A Word in the Behalf of the King (London, 1660), p. 14Google Scholar; Fell, Henry, in Copies, pp. 18–19Google Scholar; Pennyman, ad cal. Bishop, , To Thee Charts, pp. 5, 7Google Scholar.

10 Salthouse, , A Candle, p. 23Google Scholar.

11 LF, Spence MSS, vol. 3, no. 98.

12 Burrough, , A Visitation, p. 9Google Scholar; LF, Spence MSS, vol. 3, nos. 104, 110; Smith, William, in Copies, p. 42Google ScholarPubMed; Whitehead, George, in Copies, pp. 49–50Google Scholar.

13 LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 4, fol. 18r.

14 LF, Spence MSS, vol. 3, nos. 56, 97; Fox the Younger, Noble Salutation, title-page; Ross, Isabel, Margaret Fell: Mother of Quakerism (2nd ed.; York, 1984), pp. 126–35 passimGoogle Scholar.

15 Horle, Craig W., The Quakers and the English Legal System 1660–1688 (Philadelphia, 1988), pp. 281–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Bishop, , The Last Trump (London, 1662), pp. 8, 12Google Scholar.

17 Smith, Humphrey, Sound Tilings Asserted (n.p., 1662), pp. 6–7Google Scholar; Green, Thomas, A Trumpet Sounded (n.p., 1662), p. 7Google Scholar; Howgill, Mary, The Vision of the Lord of Hosts (n.p., 1662), p. 7Google Scholar; Billing, Edward, For Every Individual Superior and Inferior Magistrate (London, 1662)Google Scholar.

18 Somerset Record Office, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fol. 24r [hereafter cited as SRO]. The biblical reference is to 2 Kings 22: 14-20.

19 Fox the Younger, , Noble Salutation, p. 19Google Scholar.

20 F, Thimbeck MSS, no. 5; LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 3, fol. 146r.

21 LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 5, fols. 43r–43Av.

22 LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 1, fol. 152r; Cheshire Record Office, MSS EFC 1/1/1 (entry for 20 June 1678) [hereafter cited as CRO].

23 LF, Morning Meeting Minutes 1673-92, pp. 7, 79; Lloyd, Arnold, Quaker Social History 1669–1738 (London, 1950), p. 90Google Scholar. Whitehead was presumably referring to either A General Epistle to Be Read, which he had written in December 1682 while a prisoner in Lincoln Castle, or Ministers Among the People of God (Called Quakers) No Jesuits (1683).

24 LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 1, fol. 24r; LF, Morning Meeting Minutes 1673-92, p. 19.

25 LF, Morning Meeting Minutes 1673-92, pp. 3, 5-6, 35, 63, 66, 68, 79-81.

26 CRO, MSS EFC 1/1/1 (entry for 3 June 1684); Dorset Record Office, MSS NQ1/A19, fols. 9v-10r.

27 SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/4, fol. 3r. Cook erroneously cited the 29th clause of Magna Carta, but intended the 39th, which stipulated that no free man should be imprisoned, disseised, or exiled except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.

28 The Journal of George Fox, ed. Penney, Norman, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1911), 2: 290–91Google Scholar.

29 Cumbria Record Office (Kendal), MSS WD/Ry, Box 35, John Blaykling to Daniel Fleming (14 Oct. 1678); SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/3 (doc. 24). Friends were strongly discouraged from using the courts to resolve disputes among themselves. CRO, MSS EFC 1/1/1 (entry for 5 Feb. 1678); EFC 2/1/1 (entries for 5 May, 7 July, 3 Nov. 1680).

30 East Sussex Record Office, MSS SOF 13/1, fol. 23r.

31 Greaves, Richard L., Deliver Us from Evil: The Radical Underground in Britain, 1660–1663 (New York and Oxford, 1986), p. 66Google Scholar; LF, Morning Meeting Minutes 1673-92, p. 7.

32 Lloyd, , Quaker Social History, pp. 90–91Google Scholar; [Penn, William], Englands Great Interest in the Choice of This New Parliament (n.p., [1679])Google Scholar, passim; Dunn, Mary Maples, William Penn: Politics and Conscience (Princeton, N.J., 1967), pp. 25-26, 32-40, 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Apparently with an eye to the forthcoming election, the Oxfordshire Quarterly Meeting drew up a list of eighty-nine Quaker freeholders in the county in 1680 (Lloyd, , Quaker Social History, p. 83Google Scholar).

33 Reay, , The Quakers, p. 108Google Scholar. Cf. Whiting, John, Persecution Expos'd (London, 1715), p. 34Google Scholar. In the 1650s and again in the reign of James II some Quakers served as magistrates. [Harwood, John], To All People That Profess the Eternal Truth ([London], 1663), p. 4Google Scholar; LF, Barclay MSS, 1: 103.

34 B[urrough], E[dward], A Declaration to All the World (London, 1660), p. 5Google Scholar; this work was first published in 1657.

35 Pennyman, ad cal. Bishop, , To Tliee Charts, p. 8Google Scholar; LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 3, fol. 136r. Cf. H[owgill], F[rancis], One of Antichrists Voluntiers Defeated (London, 1660), p. 13Google Scholar.

36 Fox the Younger, , Noble Salutation, p. 18Google Scholar; Margaret Fell, A Declaration, p. 4.

37 Burrough, , A Visitation, pp. 22–23Google Scholar; Fell, Henry, in Copies, p. 22Google Scholar; Fox the Younger, , Noble Salutation, pp. 18–19Google Scholar.

38 Burrough, , A Visitation, p. 14Google Scholar; Whiting, , Persecution, p. 17Google Scholar; Fell, Margaret, A Declaration, p. 3Google Scholar.

39 [Fox, ], Three General Epistles to Be Read (n.p., 1664), p. 5Google Scholar. Cf. LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 7, fol. 169r.

40 SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/4, fol. lr; LF, Barclay MSS, 2: 148.

41 LF, Spence MSS, vol. 3, nos. 4, 100, 107.

42 LF, Spence MSS, vol. 3, nos. 118-19; SRO, MSS DD/SFR 8/2, p. 72; LF, Barclay MSS, 2: 165.

43 CRO, MSS EFC 1/1/1 (entries for 1 March 1679; 2 March, 1 June, 7 Sept. 1686; 13 March, 12 June, 11 Sept. 1688); EFC 2/1/1 (entry for 2 Jan. 1678); EFC 4/1/1 (entries for 3 Nov. 1680; 2 Feb., 5 April, 5 July, 3 Aug. 1681; 3 Jan., 7 Feb., 2 May, 6 June, 4 July, 5 Sept. 1682; 1 Feb., 11 March, 1 April 1684); EFC 5/1/1 (entry for 8 Oct. 1679); EFC 5/2/1 (undated entry, c. 1679).

44 LF, Barclay MSS, 2: 168; [Harwood, ], To All People, p. 4Google Scholar; Price, John, The Mystery and Method of His Majesty's Happy Restauration (London, 1680), p. 31Google Scholar; Fox, , Journal, ed. Penney, 2: 47Google ScholarPubMed; Hill, The Experience of Defeat, ch. 5; Brock, Peter, The Quaker Peace Testimony 1660 to 1914 (York, 1990), ch. 2Google Scholar; Reay, , The Quakers, pp. 41-43, 83-84, 88–91Google Scholar; Barbour, Hugh, The Quakers in Puritan England (New Haven, Conn., 1964), pp. 196, 202Google Scholar. Some Quaker converts had fought in the royalist armies (H[ardcastle], P[eter], The Quakers Plea [London, 1661], p. 4)Google Scholar.

45 Hill, , The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution (New York, 1973), p. 194Google Scholar; Bossy, John, “One More Allegory,” Bunyan Studies 2 (Spring 1990): 77Google Scholar.

46 Salthouse, , A Candle, p. 7Google Scholar; Fox, , Journal, ed. Penney, 2: 53, 272Google ScholarPubMed. Cf. Whitehead, , in Copies, p. 49Google Scholar. Some Quakers in Maryland and Rhode Island were espousing pacifist principles in the late 1650s (Brock, , Quaker Peace Testimony, pp. 19–20Google Scholar).

47 Fox, , in Copies, pp. 4, 6–7Google ScholarPubMed; idem., A Word, pp. 4, 13; LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 7, fol. 129v. In the aftermath of the Northern Rebellion Fox again pressed his contention that “the jewes weapons were carnall: but the true christians weapons are spirituall” (Journal, ed. Penney, , 2: 55Google Scholar).

48 Smith, William, A Short Testimony on the Behalf of Trutlis Innocency (London, 1660), pp. 5–6Google Scholar; Burrough, , A Visitation, pp. 10–11Google Scholar.

49 Fell, Margaret, A Declaration, p. 7Google Scholar. Brock too underscores the emergence of the peace principle prior to the declaration of 1661 but does not link its widespread adoption among Friends to their disillusionment with the interregnum regimes (Quaker Peace Testimony, pp. 22-25).

50 Greaves, , Deliver Us from Evil, pp. 50–53Google Scholar.

51 Fox, , et at., A Declaration from the Harmles & Innocent People of God (London, 1661), pp. 1-2, 4–5Google Scholar. For using “camall weapons” the Fifth Monarchists were denounced by Fox, as “none of Christs servants but ye beasts & whores” (Journal, ed. Penney, 2: 12Google Scholar).

52 Reay, , The Quakers, p. 121Google Scholar.

53 The Journal of George Fox, ed. Nickalls, John L. (Cambridge, 1952), p. 357Google Scholar; Nayler, James, in Copies, p. 16Google Scholar; Caton, William, in Copies, p. 46Google Scholar; Fell, Margaret, A Declaration, pp. 7–8Google Scholar; Fox the Younger, , Noble Salutation, p. 19Google Scholar, Cf. Fox, , Our Covenant with God (London, 1660)Google Scholar.

54 Fox, , et al., A Declaration, p. 8; cf. p. 4Google Scholar.

55 LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 3, fol. 146r.

56 Public Record Office, London, State Papers 29/63/70 [hereafter cited as PRO, SP]; Hill, , The Experience of Defeat, p. 162Google Scholar.

57 Quoted in Vann, Richard T., The Social Development of English Quakerism 1655–1755 (Cambridge, Mass., 1969), pp. 16–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 PRO, SP 29/8/155; 29/43/25; Calendar of the Clarendon State Papers, vol. 5, ed. Routledge, F. J. (Oxford, 1970), p. 258Google Scholar; LF, Morning Meeting Minutes 1673-92, p. 7.

59 LF, Spence MSS, vol. 3, no. 106.

60 Reay, , The Quakers, pp. 105–106Google Scholar; SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fol. 2r.

61 LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 3, fol. 182r-v. Cf. Greaves, , Deliver Us from Evil, p. 106Google Scholar.

62 Ibid., p. 65; LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 1, fol. 44r–v.

63 Kingdomes Intelligencer 50 (8-15 December 1662), pp. 804–06Google Scholar; Greaves, , Deliver Us from Evil, pp. 177-78, 180-81, 190, 200–01Google Scholar; PRO, SP 29/84/28.

64 PRO, SP 29/77/50; 29/78/6; LF, Barclay MSS, 1: 92, 93. Two Quakers-the shoemaker Robert Wharton and the surgeon George Walker-were accused of complicity at Kendal but were apparently not tried (Braithwaite, William C., The Second Period of Quakerism [2nd ed.; London, 1961], p. 30Google Scholar; cf. p. 39).

65 PRO, SP 29/91/7.1; Fox, , Journal, ed. Penney, 2: 34-35, 52Google Scholar; LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 3, fol. 154r; Ross, , Margaret Fell, p. 181Google Scholar.

66 LF, Abraham MSS, no. 8; LF, Swarthmore MSS, vol. 3, fol. 105r; Fox, , Journal, ed. Penney, 2: 46, 58Google Scholar. Cf. LF, Barclay MSS, 1: 92.

67 PRO, SP 29/117/37.

68 PRO, SP 29/155/15.

69 PRO, SP 29/171/21, 21.1; 29/190/104.1; Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1666-67, pp. 495-96.

70 Oreaves, , Enemies Under His Feet: Radicals and Nonconformists in Britain, 1664–1677 (Stanford, Calif., 1990), p. 31Google Scholar; British Library, Add. MSS 41,810, fol. 14r; 41,818, fol. 265r.

71 PRO, SP 29/147/86, 86.1; 29/156/107.1.

72 PRO, SP 29/95/66; 29/113/63, 63.1-2.

73 PRO, SP 29/260/136. Fox, of course, continued to denounce both plotting and violence. Journal, ed. Penney, , 2: 172, 272Google Scholar.

74 Greaves, , Enemies Under His Feet, pp. 136-37, 156Google Scholar.

75 CRO, MSS EFC 1/1/1 (entry for 5 June 1683); EFC 4/1/1 (entries for 3 and 12 June, 7 Aug. 1683); PRO, SP 29/428/60, p. 97; 29/430/111, pp. 29, 33, 53; 29/431/15, 30.

76 SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fol. 46r; Whiting, , Persecution, pp. 128–29Google Scholar; LF, Dix MSS A29S; Fox, , All Friends Everywhere (London, 1683), p. 3Google Scholar. Cf. similar petitions to the justices at Bridgwater (SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/4, fol. 121r) and Ivelchester (SRO, DD/SFR 10/4, fol. 50r), and the judges of assize at Taunton (SRO, DD/SFR 10/4, fols. 118v–119r). The Friends also reprinted the declaration against plotting first issued after the 1661 Vennerite rebellion; Braithwaite, , Second Period, p. 113Google Scholar.

77 Whiting, , Persecution, p. 32Google Scholar.

78 BL, Add. MSS 41,812, fol. 226r–v; 41,818, fols. 79v–80r, 125r.

79 BL, Lansdowne MSS 1152, fol. 243v.

80 Clifton, Robin, The Last Popular Rebellion: The Western Rising of 1685 (New York, 1984), pp. 178-79, 192Google Scholar; LF, Dix MSS H2S.

81 SRO, MSS DD/SFR(w) 1, p. 95; SRO, DD/SFR 10/2, fol. 48r–v; LF, Meeting for Sufferings Minutes 1684–85, pp. 87, 90, 96, 98; Whiting, , Persecution, pp. 141–43Google Scholar. One of the ships used by the defeated rebels to escape to the Netherlands was apparently provided by a Quaker (BL, Add. MSS 41,812, fol. 171v).

82 LF, Meeting for Sufferings Minutes 1684-85, pp. 96-97, 103, 113, 138, 173, 196.

83 Reay has identified only twelve Quakers who supported Monmouth; The Quakers, p. 110. Wokey, Bishop, Paul, and Bryant were clearly not active Friends.

84 LF, Meeting for Sufferings Minutes 1684-85, pp. 121-22, 125; cf. pp. 84, 87, 90, 93, 96-97, 100-01, 110-12, 116, 120, 123-24, 128, 131, 134, 143, 154A, 164, 185, 206, 260; SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fols. 57r–57Av.

85 SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fol. 48r–v. Cf. LF, Dix MSS H2S; Meeting for Sufferings Minutes 1684-85, p. 139; Whiting, , Persecution, pp. 157–58Google Scholar.

86 SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fol. 49r.

87 SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fols. 49r, 50v; LF, Dix MSS H2S. Efforts were also made to secure the repentance of Francis Scott and John Hellier. SRO, MSS DD/SFR(w) 1, p. 95.

88 SRO, MSS DD/SFR 10/2, fol. 69r.