Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T16:53:36.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seats of Honor, Seats of Power: The Symbolism of Public Seating in the English Urban Community, c. 1560-1620*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Get access

Extract

The use of anthropological methods and models to inform the conceptualization of social history is no longer a novelty by any means. Whereas the historian has long documented and interpreted the events and sometimes the material objects of past times, and placed them in causal relationships, in recent years anthropologists have helped historians to unveil the multiplicity of meaning in a particular sets of events or material objects. Common and effective applications of such collaboration have been made with regard to such concerns as kinship and marriage, the nature of personal honor, hospitality, and the ritualized expression of group identity. Yet historians have also employed an anthropological approach to the ritualistic or semiotic aspects of whole communities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada for funding which facilitated the research for this paper, Dr. Edwin DeWindt for encouraging me to write it, and Drs. Marjorie McIntosh, Vanessa Harding and Julia Merrit for reading it in draft.

References

1 Geertz, Clifford, “Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in Geertz, , The Interpretation of Cultures, Selected Essays (New York, 1973), p. 21Google Scholar.

2 E.g., Geertz, , Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali (Princeton, 1980)Google Scholar; Geertz, , Islam Observed, Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia (New Haven, 1968)Google Scholar; Geertz, C., Geertz, H. and Rosen, L., Meaning and Order in Moroccan Society (Cambridge and New York, 1979)Google Scholar.

3 Representative examples would include Kantorowicz, Ernst, The King's Two Bodies (Princeton, 1957)Google Scholar; Strong, Roy, Splendour at Court: Renaissance Spectacle and Illusion (London, 1973)Google Scholar; Burke, Peter, Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe (London, 1978)Google Scholar; Muir, Edward, Civic Ritual in Renaissance Venice, (Princeton, 1981)Google Scholar; and Busahway, Bob, By Rite, Custom, Ceremony and Community in England, 1700–1880 (London, 1982)Google Scholar.

4 Phythian-Adams, Charles, “Ceremony and the Citizen, the Communal Year at Coventry, 1450-1550” in Clark, Peter and Slack, Paul, eds., Crisis and Order in English Towns, 1500–1700 (London, 1972), pp. 5785Google Scholar, and Phythian-Adams, , Desolation of a City, Coventry and the Urban Crisis of the Late Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1979), part 4Google Scholar.

5 Phythian-Adams, “Ceremony and the Citizen,” and see also James, Mervyn, “Ritual, Drama and Social Body in the Late Medieval English Town,” Past and Present 98 (Feb., 1983): 330CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kolve, V. A., The Play Called Corpus Christi (New York, 1966)Google Scholar, and Nelson, Alan H., The Medieval English Stage, Corpus Christi Pageants and Plays (Chicago, 1974)Google Scholar.

6 Brigden, Susan, “Religion and Social Obligation in Early Sixteenth Century London,” Past and Present 103 (May, 1984): 67112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Phythian-Adams, , “Ceremony and the Citizen,” p. 80Google Scholar.

8 This concept is explored in Tittler, , “The End of the Middle Ages in the English Country Town,” Sixteenth Century Journal 18, 4 (Winter, 1987): 471–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Though a case has recently been made by Dr. Marjorie McIntosh for greater community control amongst small towns of the southeast in the late fifteenth century, the evidence of borough incorporations, town trusts, litigation and even Crown intervention supports this trend over a wider geographic area and to a greater extent in the period especially from c. 1540-1640. Cf. McIntosh, , “Local Change and Community Control in England, 1465-1500,” Huntington Library Quarterly 49, 3 (Summer 1986): 219–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tittler, , “The Incorporation of Boroughs 1540-1558”; History 62, 204 (February 1977): 2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Everitt, Alan, “The Marketing of Agricultural Produce,” in Thirsk, J., ed.; The Agricultural History of England and Wales, 4: 1500–1640 (Cambridge, 1967), pp. 502–06Google Scholar; Clark, and Slack, , Crisis and Order, p. 22Google Scholar, and English Towns in Transition (London, 1976), pp. 126–28Google ScholarPubMed; Tittler, “The End of the Middle Ages in the English Country Town.”

10 Clark, and Slack, , Crisis and Order, p. 22Google Scholar.

11 E.g., Dobson, R. B., “Admissions to the Freemen of the City of York in the Later Middle Ages,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 23 (1973): 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ramsay, G. D., “The Recruitment and Fortunes of Some London Freemen in the mid-Sixteenth Century,” Ec.H.R., 2 ser., 31 (1978): 526–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 E.g., Webb, John, Poor Relief in Elizabethan Ipswich (Suffolk Record Society, 9, 1966)Google Scholar; Slack, Paul, “Social Policy and the Constraints of Government” in Tittler, R. and Loach, S. J., eds., The Mid-Tudor Polity, c. 1540–1560 (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Slack, , ed., Poverty and Policy in Early Stuart Salisbury (Wiltshire Record Society, 31, 1971)Google Scholar; Slack, , Poverty and Policy in Tudor and Stuart England (1988)Google Scholar; Beier, A. L., Masterless Men, the Vagrancy Problem in England, 1560–1640 (London, 1985)Google Scholar; Sharpe, J. A., Crime in Early Modern England, 1550–1750 (London, 1984)Google Scholar, and its bibliography; McIntosh, “Local Change and Community Control,” and also Local Responses to the Poor in Late Medieval and Tudor England,” Continuity and Change 3, 2 (1988): 209–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 E.g., Hammer, Carl I. Jr., “Anatomy of an Oligarchy, the Oxford Town Council in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries,” Journal of British Studies 18, 1 (Fall 1978): 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pearl, Valerie, “Change and Stability in Seventeenth Century London,” London Journal 5 (1979): 334CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rappaport, S., “Social Structure and Mobility in Sixteenth Century London,” Part I, London Journal 9 (1983): 107–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Part II, 10 (Spring, 1984): 107-34 and Rappaport, , Worlds Within Worlds, Structures of Life in Sixteenth Century London (Cambridge, 1989), esp. chs. 3 and 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Geertz, C., “Centers, Kings and Charisma: Reflections on the Symbolics of Power,” in Ben-David, J. and Clark, T. N., eds., Culture and its Creators (Chicago, 1977)Google Scholar, as reprinted in Wilentz, Sean, ed., Rites of Power, Symbolism, Ritual and Politics Since the Middle Ages (Philadelphia, 1985), pp. 1516Google Scholar.

15 Eames, Penelope, Furniture in England, France and the Netherlands from the Twelfth to the Fifteenth Century (London, 1977), pp. xxi and 181Google Scholar. Compare this now current view with the traditions expressed in Fastnedge, Ralph, English Furniture Styles, 1500–1830 (1955, reprinted London, 1969), p. 8 or HGoogle Scholar. Cescinsky, and Gibble, E. R., Early English Furniture and Woodwork, 2 vols. (London, 1922), 2: 145Google Scholar.

16 Gloag, John, The Englishman's Chair (London, 1964), p. 41Google Scholar. See also Wolsey, S. W. and Luff, R. W. P., Furniture in the Age of the Joiner (London, 1968), p. 69Google Scholar.

17 Priestley, Ursula and Corfield, P.J., “Rooms and Room Use in Norwich Housing, 1580-1730,” Post-Medieval Archeology 16 (1982): 108–09Google Scholar; Agius, Pauline, “Late Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Furniture at Oxford,” Furniture History 7 (1971): 72, 76Google Scholar.

18 Chinnery, Victor, Oak Furniture: the British Tradition, a History of Early Furniture in the British Isles and New England (London, 1979), p. 39Google Scholar. Christopher Hill sees the common replacement of benches by chairs in the wealthier homes only in the Restoration period, though this may be something of an extreme view; Hill, , The Century of Revolution (London, 1961), p. 250CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Wickham, Glynne, Early English Stages, 1300-1600, 3 vols. (1959-1981), 1: 146 and n. 105Google Scholar.

20 Cescinsky, Herbert, “An Oak Chair in St. Mary's Hall, Coventry,” Burlington Magazine 39 (Oct. 1921): 170–77Google Scholar, summarized in Cescinsky, and Oribble, , Early English Furniture, 2: 154163 and figs. 204 and 220Google Scholar; Gloag, , Englishman's Chair, pp. 3334Google Scholar; Eames, P., Furniture in England… pp. 196–97Google Scholar.

21 Ingram, R. W., ed., Records of Early English Drama, Coventry (Toronto, 1981), pp. 364365Google Scholar.

22 Public Record Office, STAC 5/C23/37, deposition of James Cooke; STAC 5/C41/1, deposition of George Chatfield.

23 Pegden, N. A., Leicester Guildhall, a Short History and Guide (Leicester, 1981), p. 4Google Scholar; Fosbrooke, T. H. and Skillington, S. H., “The Old Town Hall of Leicester,” Trans. Leicestershire Archeol. Soc. 13 (1923-1924): 172Google Scholar, passim.

24 These furnishings seem first to have been noted in Tittler, Robert, Architecture and Power, the Town Hall and the English Urban Community, c. 1500–1640 (Oxford, 1991), plates 9 and 10Google Scholar. The author wishes to thank Mr. Raymond Grange and Ms. Margaretha Smith of the Borough of Beverley Tourist Office, and Mr. Arthur Coates of Beverley for access to this furniture and discussion thereof, and to Mr. Clive Wainwright of the Victoria and Albert Museum for his advice on the same.

25 Raine, A., ed., York Civic Records, 6 (Yorkshire Archeol. Soc., Rec. Sen, 112, 1948 for 1946): 55Google Scholar.

26 Raine, A., ed., York Civic Records, 7 (Yorks. Arch. Soc., Rec. Ser., 115, 1950 for 1949): 168Google Scholar. The reference also illustrates the usage “Lord Mayor,” a designation exclusive, so far as is known, to the chief officials of York and London; Oxford English Dictionary (1st ed.), vide “Lord Mayor.”

27 Department of the Environment, “List of Buildings of Historical Interest, District of S. Hams, Devon” (1978), pp. 4344Google Scholar (notes by Michael Laithwaite).

28 Chinnery, , Oak Furniture, pp. 448–49 and plate IGoogle Scholar.

29 Victoria County History, Wiltshire, 6 (1962), p. 87Google Scholar. Shortt, Hugh, ed., The City of Salisbury (1957), pp. 58 and 94Google Scholar; Salisbury City Muniments, Wiltshire Record Office MS. G23/1/3 (“Ledgerbook, 1571-1640”), fol. 61r. The fact that the Salisbury chairs were donated by individual mayors, a donation commemorated by the initials of the donor, should not be neglected. It suggests a parallel to the donation by prominent families of relics or other holy objects to Italian churches of the same era, or the tendency of monarchs in many past societies to redistribute gifts to the community. Such donations may be seen as efforts to gain notoriety and respect from the recipient community. See, e.g., Trexler, Richard, “Ritual Behaviour in Renaissance Florence: the Setting,” Medievalia et Humanistica, n.s., 4 (1973): 128–29Google Scholar and Geertz, “Centers, Kings and Charisma,” passim.

30 E.g., Hirst, Derek, The Representatives of the People? Voters and Voting under the Early Stuarts (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 45–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark and Slack, Crisis and Order, Introduction; and Clark and Slack, English Towns in Transition, ch. 9; Hoskins, W. G., The Age of Plunder, England in the Age of Henry VIII, 1500–1547 (1976), p. 42Google Scholar. The author is currently preparing an essay on this theme, entitled “The Apotheosis of the Mayoralty, c. 1500-1640.”

31 See Tittler, Architecture and Power, chs. 3-4.

32 This point emerges from an examination of Statutes of the Realm, in which mayoral powers are frequently equated with those of the J.P., a survey of charters of incorporation as they appear in the Calendar of Patent Rolls, and in numerous town by-laws in which the blossoming of mayoral authority is almost ubiquitously reflected. Cf. also Bellamy, John G., Criminal Law and Society in Late Medieval and Tudor England (Gloucester and New York, 1984), chs. 1 and 2Google Scholar; Henderson, E. G., Foundations of English Administrative Law… (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), chs. 1 and 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice, English Local Government, The Manor and the Borough, 2 vols. (1908), chs. 2, 3, and 6Google Scholar; and Bateson, M., ed., Borough Customs, 2 vols. (Selden Soc., 1904 and 1906)Google Scholar. The best contemporary description of the Mayor's role in a highly developed example of municipal government in this era is Hooker's, JohnDescription of the Citie of Excester, ed., Harte, W. J., Schopp, J. W. and Tapley-Soper, H., (Exeter, 1919), 3: 804–06Google Scholar.

33 Jewitt, Llewellyn and Hope, W. H. St. John, The Corporate Plate and Insignia of Office of the Cities and Towns of England and Wales, 2 vols. (1895), 1: xxiiixlGoogle Scholar; Tweedy-Smith, R., The History, Law, Practice and Procedure Relating to Mayors, Aldermen and Councillors (1934), ch. 6Google Scholar; Tittler, , Architecture and Power, pp. 35-7, 117–18Google Scholar.

34 Aries, P. and Duby, George, eds., A History of Private Life, (New York, 1987), 1: 8Google Scholar.

35 Trexler, Richard, Public Life in Renaissance Florence (New York, 1980), p. 258Google Scholar.

36 Muir, , Civic Ritual in Renaissance Venice p. 205Google Scholar; cf. also pp. 191, 206, 253 and 274.

37 Grant, Michelle, “The Person of the King: Ritual and Power in a Ghanaian State,” in Cannadine, David and Price, Simon, eds., Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies (Cambridge, 1982), pp. 298330Google Scholar. See also Wilks, Ivor, Asante in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 110-112, 391, 430 and 661Google Scholar; and Kyerematen, A. A. Y., “The Royal Stools of Ashanti,” Africa, 38, i, 25Google Scholar. My thanks to Prof. J. D. Esseks for his insights into Ghanian culture.

38 Gilbert, , “The Person of the King,” pp. 318–19Google Scholar.

39 Master's chairs are depicted in numerous contemporary woodcuts, including those reprinted in Orme, Nicholas, Education and Society in Medieval and Renaissance England (London, 1989), p. 72Google Scholar; Lawson, John and Silver, Harold, A Social History of Education in England (London, 1973), pp. 101 and 138Google Scholar and Thompson, Craig R., Schools in Tudor England (Ithaca, New York), p. 40Google Scholar. It is worth noting that these conventionally show the master wielding a birch: a symbol of authority akin to and held in the same manner as the mayor's mace. A master's chair may be dated from c. 1531 at Newark-upon-Trent School, and from c. 1541 at Berkhampstead School; Seaborne, Malcolm, The English School, ils Architecture and Organization, 1370–1870 (London, 1971), pp. 1416Google Scholar. My thanks to Prof. Kenneth Charlton for his help in identifying appropriate depictions and his discussion of the issue.

40 Agius, Pauline, “Late Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Furniture at Oxford,” Furniture History 7 (1971): 7276Google Scholar; Chinnery, , Oak Furniture, p. 19Google Scholar; Nelson, Alan, Records of Early English Drama, Cambridge, 2 vols. (Toronto and Buffalo, 1989), 1: 507–08Google Scholar. For a presentation of patriarchal authority in the family during this period, see Stone, Lawrence, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500–1800 (London, 1977), especially ch. 5Google Scholar. It is probably superfluous to note the importance of priority seating at court. When the Duchess of Alba, accompanying the entourage of Philip II of Spain following his marriage to Mary Tudor, came to court, both Queen and Duchess insisted on the courtesy of sitting lower than the other. In the end they both sat on the floor! Loades, David, Mary Tudor, a Life (London, 1989), p. 33Google Scholar.

41 See n. 5 above. Corpus Christi pageants have been documented in Wakefield, York, Coventry, Chester and in an unidentified city which sounds much like Lincoln, but numerous other pageants performed elsewhere undoubtedly often served a similar social function. See Nelson, Alan H., The Medieval English Stage, Corpus Christi Pageants and Plays (Chicago, 1974)Google Scholar, passim.

42 Heales, Alfred, History and Law of Church Seats, 2 vols. (1872), 1: 3031Google Scholar.

43 Mire, John, Instructions for Parish Priests, ed. by Peacock, John (Early English Text Society, rev. ed., 1902, repr., 1975), p. 9Google Scholar, lines 270-276, as cited in Heales, , Church Seats, 1: 11Google Scholar. See also Thompson, A. H., The Historical Growth of the English Parish Church (2nd ed.; Cambridge, 1913), p. 109Google Scholar.

44 Heales, , Church Seats, 1: 1112Google Scholar.

45 Hardy, W. J., “Remarks on the History of Seat Reservations in Churches,” Archeologia (2nd ser., part i, 53, 1892): 104Google Scholar; Masters, B. R. and Ralph, E., eds., The Church Book of St. Ewen's, Bristol, 1454–1584 (Bristol and Gloucestershire Archeol. Soc., Records Section, 6, 1967), pp. xxvi, et passimGoogle Scholar.

46 Churchwardens' Accounts, St. Lawrence, Reading, 1498-1626, Berkshire Record Office MS. D/P 97/5/2, p. 349. I am indebted to the Records of Early English Drama project at the University of Toronto for access to microfilms of these and other Reading churchwardens' accounts noted below, and especially to Dr. Alexandra Johnston for her advice concerning these records.

47 Masters, and Ralph, , The Church Book of St. Ewen's, Bristol, p. 25Google Scholar; Cox, J. Charles, Churchwardens' Accounts from the Fourteenth Century to the Close of the Seventeenth Century (London, 1913), pp. 67 and 189Google Scholar.

48 Cox, , Churchwardens' Accounts, p. 189Google Scholar; Public Record Office, SP 14/112/83; Rev. Beresford, J. R., ed., “The Churchwardens' Accounts of Holy Trinity, Chester, 1532-1633,” Jour. Chester N. Wales Archit., Archeol. and Hist. Soc. 38 (1951); 112–17Google Scholar; Foster, J. E., ed., Churchwardens' Accounts of St. Mary the Great, Cambridge from 1504 to 1635 (Cambridge Antiq. Soc., 35, 1905), passim; 5 Edward VI, c. 4Google Scholar.

49 Foster, , Accounts of St. Mary the Great, Cambridge, pp. 572–73Google Scholar, et passim; Amphlett, Joseph, ed., The Churchwardens' Accounts of St. Michael's in Bedwardine, Worcester, 1539–1603 (Worcester Hist. Soc., VII, 1896), pp. xvxviGoogle Scholar; Orders of 9 and 23 Elizabeth cited in SP 14/112/83; Bailey, John, ed., Transcription of the Minutes of the Borough of Boston, 3 vols. (1980–), 1: 81, 643Google Scholar.

50 Churchwardens' Accounts, St. Giles, Reading, 1518-1642, Berkshire Record Office MSS D/P 96/5/1, 1518-1642, passim.

51 This and subsequent conclusions about the identity of prominent citizens rests on the correlation of the names of Reading office holders, especially its Capital and Secondary Burgesses, with those listed as renting seats in the same years. The reprinted lists of officials may be found in J.M. Guilding, Records of Reading, 4 vols. (Reading, 1897- ), 1: passim, for the appropriate years.

52 Churchwardens' Accounts, St. Lawrence's, Reading, 1498-1626, Berkshire R.O. MS. D/P 97/5/2.

53 Churchwardens' Accounts, St. Mary's, Reading, 1550-1642, Berkshire Record Office MS. D/P 98/5/1.

54 Berkshire R.O. MS. D/P 98/5/1, p. 90.

55 Such listings seem not infrequently to have been kept, though most have not survived. Berkshire R.O. MS. D/P 98/5/1, p. 92 for 1585, p. 94 for 1586 and p. 96 for 1587.

56 E.g., Clark, Peter, “The Migrant in Kentish Towns, 1580-1640” in Clark, and Slack, , Crisis and Order in English Towns, 1500–1700, pp. 117–63Google Scholar. Patten, J., Rural-Urban Migration in Pre-Industrial England (Oxford U. School of Geography Resch. Ppr., 1973), passimGoogle Scholar.

57 Borough Order Minute Book, 2: 56, as cited in Adey, K. R., “Aspects of the History of the Town of Stafford, 1590-1710” (M.A. Thesis, University of Keele, 1971), p. 97Google Scholar.

58 Bailey, , Transcription of Minutes of Boston, 1: 81Google Scholar.

59 Bailey, , Transcription of Minutes of Boston, 1: 643Google Scholar.

60 Hillen, Henry F., History of the Borough of King's Lynn, 2 vols. (Norwich, n.d. [1907]), 1: 310Google Scholar, as cited in Battley, S. M., “Elite and Community, the Mayors of Sixteenth Century King's Lynn,” (Ph.D. Diss., S.U.N.Y., Stony Brook, 1981), p. 207Google Scholar. I am indebted to Dr. Battley for permission to examine her thesis.

61 E.g., Salter, H. E., ed., Oxford Council Acts, 1583–1626 (Oxford Historical Soc., 1928), p. 408Google Scholar; Carrington, F. A., “The Old Market House and the Great Fire at Marlborough,” Wilts. Archeol. and Nat. Hist. Mag. 3 (1957): 112Google Scholar; Rev.Beresford, J. R., “The Churchwardens' Accounts of Holy Trinity, Chester, 1532-1633,” Jour. Chester N. Wales Archit., Archeol. and Hist. Soc. 38 (1951): 149Google Scholar; Cox, , Churchwardens' Accounts, p. 68Google Scholar.

62 Cox, , Churchwardens' Accounts, p. 193Google Scholar; Knight, Mark, “Religious Life in Coventry, 1485-1558” (Ph.D. Diss., Warwick University, 1986), pp. 132–34Google Scholar.

63 Palliser, D. M., The Age of Elizabeth, England under the Later Tudors, 1547–1603 (London, 1983), p. 84Google Scholar and PRO, SP 14/112/83; Addy, John, Sin and Society in the Seventeenth Century (New York, 1989), pp. 5051et seqGoogle Scholar.

64 Gough, Richard, The History of Myddle [c. 1702, 1834], Hey, David, ed. (Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1981), p. 77Google Scholarpassim. For the rules governing the issue, well established even in the Common Law by Gough's time, see Prideaux, H., Directions to Church Wardens, (London, 1692), pp. 111Google Scholaret seq., and Bum, Richard, Ecclesiastical Law, 2 vols. (London, 1763), 1: 254–59Google Scholar.

65 Smith, A. Hassell, County and Court, Government and Politics in Norfolk, 1558–1603, (Oxford, 1974)Google Scholar; for burials see Harding, Vanessa, “‘And One More May Be Laid There,’ the Location of Burials in Early Modem London,” London Journal 14, 2 (1989): 112–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.