Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:10:45.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robert Boyle and Subversive Religion in the Early Restoration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

J. R. Jacob
Get access

Extract

Boyle's natural philosophy as it evolved in the 1660s was the product in part of some competing philosophies and theologies. Since he defined his own thought in terms of these others, one of the best ways of understanding it and its origins would seem to be to study it in relation to this context of competing ideas—especially as this has never before been done for Boyle. This was no mere battle over philosophical and religious ideas; beneath the surface lay extreme ideological differences; the nature of society and government was at stake just as it was in Boyle's dialogue with the sects in the late 1640s and the 1650s. Indeed some of his opponents in the 1660s still represent positions against which he argued before the Restoration, and these are the ones I wish to consider here.

In 1665 or 1666 Boyle wrote A Free Inquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature. By “the vulgarly received notion of nature” he means the conception deriving from ancient Greek philosophy, both Platonic and Aristotelian, that there is a governing agency in nature apart from God which cannot be reduced to the mechanical principles of matter and motion. This agency is called variously plastic nature, the astral spirits or the soul of the world, and as Boyle says is conceived by “the schools” as “a being that…does always that which is best.” Boyle's intention is to show that his own idea of nature is preferable to this Peripatetic and Platonic one because his goes further than its rival towards a proper understanding of the relations between Creator and creation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , Winter 1974 , pp. 275 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jacob, J. R., “The Ideological Origins of Robert Boyle's Natural Philosophy,” Journal of European Studies, II (Spring 1972): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Birch, Thomas, The Life of the Honourable Robert Boyle, in Birch, Thomas, ed., The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, 6 vols. (London, 1772). I:lxxxiiGoogle Scholar [hereafter cited as Birch, Life in Works].

3 Birch, Thomas, ed., the Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, 6 vols. (London, 1772), V:159Google Scholar [hereafter cited as RBW].

4 Ibid., pp. 178, 184-185.

5 Ibid., p. 227.

6 Ibid., pp. 164, 198, 216, 226-227, 251-252.

7 Ibid., p. 164.

8 Ibid., p. 198.

9 Ibid., p. 164.

10 Ibid., pp. 182-183, 250-251.

11 Ibid., p. 183.

12 Heydon, John, Theomagia (London, 1663), Bk. III, pp. 36, 112, 134Google Scholar [hereafter cited as Heydon, Theomagia].

13 Ibid., pp. 28, 36, 122, 134.

14 Ibid., Preface, f4.

15 Ibid., Bk. I, p. 168.

16 Ibid., Preface.

17 Ibid., Bk. III, p. 98.

18 Ibid., Bk. III, pp. 7, 23-25, 135-136.

19 Heydon, John, The Harmony of the World (London, 1662), Preface, pp. (b2 + 1)-b3.Google Scholar

20 Heydon, , Theomagia, Bk. III, p. 101.Google Scholar

21 RBW, V:164, 182-183, 186, 188, 250-251.

22 Heydon, , Theomagia, Bk. I, p. 1.Google Scholar

23 Yates, Frances, The Rosicrucian Enlightenment (London, 1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, [hereafter cited as Yates, Enlightenment].

24 Ibid., pp. xii, 79, 96, 128, 129; and Heydon, , Theomagia, Bk. III, p. 101.Google Scholar

25 Waite, A. E., The Real History of the Rosicrucians (New York, 1888), pp. 348–386.Google Scholar

26 As the preface to Heydon's, Holy Guide (London, 1662).Google Scholar

27 Jacob, , “Ideological Origins,” p. 16Google Scholar; and Parker, Samuel, A Free and Impartial Censure of the Platonick Philosophie (Oxford, 1666), p. 75Google Scholar, [hereafter cited as Parker, Censure].

28 The rest of the title of Heydon's, Harmony of the World (1662)Google Scholar is Whereunto is added, the state of the New Jerusalem, grounded upon the knowledge of Nature, Light of Reason, Phylosophy and Divinity.

29 Calendar of State Papers, Ireland, 1663-1665, pp. 100-101, 662, 679; and Calendar of State Papers, Ireland, 1666-1669, pp. 25-26, 33-34, 93.

30 Bell, Walter George, The Great Plague in London in 1665 (rev. ed.; London, 1951), p. 223Google Scholar; and Abbott, Wilbur C., “English Conspiracy and Dissent, 1660-1674,” American Historical Review, II (July 1909):699–700.Google Scholar

31 DNB.

32 Heydon, , Theomagia, Bk. III. p. 101.Google Scholar

33 DNB.

34 Parker, , Censure, pp. 75–76.Google Scholar

35 Ibid.

36 Hall, A. Rupert and Hall, Marie Boas, eds., The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 7 vols. (Madison, Wisconsin, 1965–1970), III:155Google Scholar [hereafter cited as HOC].

37 The London Gazette, no. 48 (26-30 April 1666).

38 Greatrakes, Valentine, A Brief Account of Mr. Valentine Greatrakes, and Divers of the Strange Cures by Him Lately Performed (London, 1666). pp. 15–18Google Scholar [hereafter cited as Greatrakes, Account].

39 Ibid., p. 19.

40 Ibid., p. 22.

41 Ibid.. pp. 22-23, 35-38.

42 L'Estrange, Roger, ed., The Newes, no. 54 (13 July 1665), p. 571.Google Scholar

43 Berwick, E., ed., The Rawdon Papers (London, 1819), pp. 204–207Google Scholar [hereafter cited as Rawdon].

44 Greatrakes, , Account, p. 38.Google Scholar

45 Ibid. p. 39.

46 R. W., , Notes and Queries, 3rd ser., V (June 11, 1864), p. 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Greatrakes, , Account, p. 39.Google Scholar

47 [Lloyd, David], Wonders No Miracles (London, 1666), p. 32Google Scholar [hereafter cited as [Lloyd], Wonders].

48 Rawdon, p. 211.

49 Crawfurd, Raymund, The King's Evil (Oxford, 1911), p. 112.Google Scholar

50 [Lloyd, ], Wonders, p. 13.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., p. 14.

52 Ibid., pp. 5, 8-9.

53 Ibid., p. 8.

54 Ibid., pp. 11-12.

55 Hill, Christopher, Antichrist in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford, 1971), pp. 4–5, 28–29.Google Scholar

56 [Lloyd, ], Wonders, pp. 8, 34, 35.Google Scholar

57 [Beachcr, Lyonell], Wonders If Not Miracles (London, 1665), pp. A2–A3.Google Scholar

58 The Royal Society of London, The Boyle Letters, II, fol. 64r [hereafter cited as BL].

59 Nicolson, M. H., ed., Conway Letters (New Haven, Conn., 1930), p. 268Google Scholar [hereafter cited as Conway].

60 Michael Boyle, Archbishop of Dublin, to Edward, Lord Conway, Dublin, 29 July 1665, in ibid., p. 263.

61 Ibid.

62 Ibid., pp. 262-263.

63 British Museum, Sloane MS. 1926. fols. 1-10; see also Hayman, Samuel, “Notes on the Family of Greatrakes Part I.” The Reliquary (October 1863), IV: 88Google Scholar, for Dublin opinion about Greatrakes in the summer of 1665.

64 Calendar of State Papers, Ireland, 1666-1669, pp. 25-26, 33-34, 93, and Abbott, , “English Conspiracy,” pp. 702–703.Google Scholar

65 Stubbe, , The Miraculous Conformist… (Oxford, 1666), pp. 25, 14, 27Google Scholar [hereafter cited as Stubbe, Conformist].

66 BL, II, fols. 52-63. 65v.

67 Ibid., fol. 65v.

68 There may be a hint of this in Stubbe, , Conformist, p. 14.Google Scholar

69 Anima Mundi (1679?); and Miracles, No Violations of the Law of Nature (1683); and Redwood, J. A., “Blount, Deism and English Free Thought,” Journal of the History of Ideas, XXXV (1974):490–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70 Birch, , Life in Works, pp. lxxix, lxxxv.Google Scholar

71 Ibid., p. lxxvii.

72 Ibid., p. lxxix.

73 Stubbe, , Conformist, p. 14Google Scholar; and [Lloyd, ], Wonders, p. 26.Google Scholar

74 HOC. I:90-92, 116, 143-144, 382, 385-386, 391-392, 406.

75 Ibid., and Crossley, James, ed., The Diary and Correspondence of John Worthington, I:199, 335.Google Scholar

76 The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge; and Kolakowski, Leszek, Chrétiens Sans Eglise, trans. Posner, Anna (Paris, 1969), pp. 197–199Google Scholar; The Mennonite Encyclopedia.

77 HOC, I:90-92, 116, 143-144, 382, 385-386, 391-392, 406.

78 Ibid., II:404-405, 408, 509, 534, and III:18.

79 The Royal Society of London, The Boyle Papers, XII, XIII, XV.

80 Walker, D. P., Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella (London, 1958), pp. 110–111Google Scholar, and Lenoble, Robert, Mersenne ou la Naissance du Mécanisme (Paris, 1943).Google Scholar

81 [Lloyd, ], Wonders, p. 26.Google Scholar

82 See notes 49-56 above.

83 Rowe, Violet, Sir Henry Vane the Younger (London, 1970), p. 228Google Scholar; and Woolrych, Austin, “Last Quests for a Settlement 1657-1660,” in Aylmer, G. E., ed., The Interregnum (London, 1972), p. 197.Google Scholar

84 Wood, Anthony, Athenae Oxonienses, 2 vols. (London, 1691), II: 413.Google Scholar

84 Zagorin, Perez, A History of Political Thought in the English Revolution (London, 1954), p. 153Google Scholar; Baxter, Richard, A Holy Commonwealth (London, 1659)Google Scholar, “An Addition to the Preface, Being a Discussion of the Answer to the Healing Question”; and Stubbe, Henry, Malice Rebuked, or a Character of Mr. Richard Baxter's Abilities. And Vindication of the Honourable Sr. Henry Vane from His Aspersions in His Key for Catholicks (London, 1659), pp. 37–60.Google Scholar

86 Baxter, Richard, Reliquiae Baxterianae… (London, 1696), Bk. I, Part II, p. 197Google Scholar; Nuttall, Geoffrey, Richard Baxter (London, 1965), pp. 79–80Google Scholar; Baxter, Richard, The Unreasonableness of Infidelity (London, 1655)Google Scholar, “The Epistle Dedicatory,” Preface, Part II, 163-168, 176-177, Part IV, 148-149; Birch, , Life in Works, p. cxl.Google Scholar

87 Battis, Emery, Saints and Sectaries (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1962), pp. 106, 269Google Scholar; Ziff, Larzer, The Career of John Cotton (Princeton, 1962), pp. 115–116Google Scholar; and Hall, David, ed., The Antinomian Controversy, 1636-1638 (Middletown, Conn., 1968), pp. 7–10, 29, 317, 351–364.Google Scholar

88 Jacob, , “Ideological Origins,” pp. 17–18.Google Scholar

89 This is treated at some length in chapter III of my book Robert Boyle and the English Revolution (Redgrave, Westport, Conn.; forthcoming in 1975).Google Scholar

90 Stubbe, , Conformist, p. 8.Google Scholar

91 [Lloyd, ], Wonders, p. 9.Google Scholar

92 Greatrakes, , Account, pp. 19, 20.Google Scholar

93 Ibid., p. 21.

94 Ibid., pp. 56-63.

95 Henry More to Lady Conway, Cambridge, 28 April [1666], in Conway, p. 273.

96 B.M., Add. MS. 4293, fol. 50.

97 Greatrakes, , Account, pp. 43–94.Google Scholar

98 Ibid., pp. 34-35.

99 Ibid., p. 35.

100 See notes 56 and 58 above.

101 Greatrakes, , Account, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar

102 Thomas, Keith, Religion and the Decline of Magic (London, 1971), p. 202Google Scholar; Hermant, G., Mémoires sur l'Histoire Ecclésiastique du XVII Siècle ( 1630-1663) (Paris, 1905), VI: 575–578.Google Scholar

103 Birch, , Life in Works, p. lxxxi.Google Scholar

104 RBW, V: 216.

105 Westfall, R. S., Science and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England (New Haven, 1958), p. 228Google Scholar; and McGuire, J. E., “Boyle's Conception of Nature,” Journal of the History of Ideas, XXXIII (Oct.-Dec., 1972):525.Google Scholar

106 This is a chapter in a long story: see Rattansi, P. M., “The Social Interpretation of Science in the Seventeenth Century,” in Mathias, Peter, ed., Science and Society 1600-1900 (Cambridge, 1972), pp. 1–32Google Scholar; and Yates, , Enlightenment, pp. 111–117.Google Scholar

107 Jacob, , “Ideological Origins,” pp. 6–8, 10–18.Google Scholar