Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:28:45.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Methods of Barbarism” and the “Rights of Small Nations”: War Propaganda and British Pluralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

John S. Ellis
Get access

Extract

The “methods of barbarism” and the “rights of small nations” are perhaps the most recognizable of British slogans arising out of the wars of the early twentieth century. They are instantly associated with the Boer War and the First World War respectively, but seldom are they associated with each other. However, the Pro-Boer rhetoric of “the methods of barbarism” and the First World War propaganda of “the rights of small nations” are intimately linked through their roots in the pluralist Liberal vision of Britishness.

These slogans and the propaganda campaigns that they epitomized must be understood within the context of a multicultural Britain and opposing notions of British national identity. Defining “barbarism” as the oppression of small nations through the brutal use of force, the Pro-Boers associated the term with the Anglocentric vision of the British nation reflected in the “New Imperialism” of the Conservatives. Through their belief in Anglo-Saxon racial superiority, the Conservative imperialists maintained that small nations like those of the Irish, the Welsh, and the Boers would either be assimilated or swept aside by the historical progress of an expanding Anglo-Saxon nation state. In contrast to this notion of Conservative “barbarism,” the Pro-Boer Liberals drew on the Gladstonian heritage of their party in defining the United Kingdom as a multinational state at the center of a multinational empire. They eschewed the use of force in the maintenance of empire and argued that the bonds of imperialism must be based upon mutual goodwill, voluntarism, and the recognition of the principle of nationality.

When the First World War broke out in 1914, propagandists drew upon these contrasting constructions of Liberal cultural pluralism and Conservative cultural uniformity. In terms similar to those employed by the Pro-Boers, British propagandists depicted the First World War as a struggle against German “barbarism” and as a fight to vindicate the “rights of small nations.” Solidly based upon the Liberal construction of the multicultural and multinational nature of Britishness, Britain's role as the champion of the principle of nationality was proclaimed with an eye not only to the international context of Europe but to the domestic context of the British state and empire as well.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , Spring 1998 , pp. 49 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Melman, Billie, “Claiming the National Past: The Invention of an Anglo-Saxon Tradition,” Journal of Contemporary History 26 (1991): 575–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MacDougall, Hugh A., Racial Myth in English History (Hanover, 1982), pp. 119–26Google Scholar; Cunningham, Hugh, “The Conservative Party and Patriotism,” in Englishness; Politics and Culture 1880–1920, ed. Colls, Robert and Dodd, Philip (New York, 1986), pp. 283–307Google Scholar; Bolt, Christine, “Race and the Victorians,” in British Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Eldridge, C. C. (New York, 1984), pp. 131–46Google Scholar.

2 Kidd, Colin, “Teutonist Ethnology and Scottish Nationalist Inhibition, 1780–1880,” The Scottish Historical Review 124 (April 1995): 45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Loughlin, James, “Joseph Chamberlain, English Nationalism and the Ulster Question,” History 11 (June 1992): 202–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Melman, Billie, “Claiming the National Past,” pp. 584–85Google Scholar; Boyce, D. G., “The Marginal Britons: The Irish,” in Englishness, pp. 230–53Google Scholar; Bolt, , “Race and the Victorians,” pp. 131–46Google Scholar; Curtis, L. P., Anglo-Saxons and Celts; A Study of Anti-Irish Prejudice in Victorian England (Bridgeport, 1968)Google Scholar.

3 The Times, 20 December 1887.

4 Salisbury, Lord, “Disintegration,” Quarterly Review (October 1888)Google Scholar, cited in Loughlin, James, Ulster Unionism and British National Identity since 1885 (London and New York, 1995), p. 7Google Scholar.

5 The Times, 20 December 1887.

6 Loughlin, , “Joseph Chamberlain,” p. 234Google Scholar.

7 Eldridge, C. C., Victorian Imperialism (London, 1978), pp. 115–18Google Scholar.

8 Field, H. John, Toward a Programme of Imperial Life; The British Empire at the Turn of the Century (Westport, 1982), pp. 45–46Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., p. 52.

10 Ibid., pp. 39–40.

11 Dilke, Charles, Greater Britain: A Record of Travel in English Speaking Countries during 1866–67, 2 vols. (London, 1869) 2: 130, 144Google Scholar, cited in Hugh MacDougall, , Racial Myth (Hanover, 1982), p. 99Google Scholar.

12 Froude, James Anthony, The English in Ireland in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1872), p. 2Google Scholar.

13 Knaplund, Paul, Gladstone and Britain's Imperial Policy (Hamden, 1966), p. 96Google Scholar; Herrick, Francis H., Gladstone and the Concept of the ‘English-Speaking Peoples, Journal of British Studies 12 (November 1972): 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Knaplund, , Gladstone and Britain's Imperial Policy, pp. 143–46Google Scholar.

15 Ibid., p. 146.

16 Eldridge, , Victorian Imperialism, pp. 115–18Google Scholar.

17 O'Day, Alan, “Irish Home Rule and Liberalism,” in The Edwardian Period: Conflict and Stability, ed. O'Day, Alan (London and Basingstoke, 1979), pp. 7–10Google Scholar.

18 Morgan, K. O., “Gladstone and Wales,” Welsh History Review 1 (Spring 1960): 82Google Scholar.

19 Bryce, James, Mr. Gladstone and the Nationalities of the United Kingdom: A Series of Letters to The Times (London, 1887), p. 7Google Scholar, cited in Boyce, , “Marginal Britons,” pp. 2–3Google Scholar.

20 O'Day, , “Irish Home Rule,” p. 116Google Scholar.

21 Loughlin, , “Joseph Chamberlain,” p. 205Google Scholar; Loughlin, James, Ulster Unionism, p. 11Google Scholar.

22 Kennedy, Paul M., The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism (London, 1980), p. 151Google Scholar.

23 Matthew, H. C. G., The Liberal Imperialists; The Ideas and Politics of a Post-Gladstonian Elite (Oxford, 1973), pp. 134–62Google Scholar; O'Day, , “Irish Home Rule,” pp. 122–28Google Scholar.

24 Eldridge, , Victorian Imperialism, p. 192Google Scholar.

25 Mock, Wolfgang, “The Function o f Race' in Imperialist Ideologies; The Example of Joseph Chamberlain,” in Nationalist and Racialist Movements in Britain and Germany Before 1914, ed. Kennedy, Paul and Nicholls, Anthony (Oxford, 1981), p. 196Google Scholar.

16 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 101 (1902), col. 117Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., col. 530.

28 Ibid., vol. 89 (1901), col. 46.

29 Ibid., vol. 101 (1902), col. 532.

30 Ibid., vol. 89 (1901), col. 105.

31 Ibid., vol. 101 (1902), col. 350.

32 Eldridge, , Victorian Imperialism, p. 209Google Scholar.

33 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 89 (1901), col. 432Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., col. 94.

35 Ibid., col. 541.

36 Ibid., col. 411.

37 Warwick, Peter, “Aftermath of War,” in The South African War: The Anglo-Boer War 1899–1902, ed. Warwick, Peter and Spies, S. B. (London, 1980), pp. 335–38Google Scholar.

38 Field, , Toward a Programme, p. 213Google Scholar.

39 Ibid., p. 205.

40 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 89 (1901), cols. 401, 409Google Scholar.

41 Ibid., vol. 101 (1902), col. 400.

42 Ibid., cols. 385, 397.

43 Ibid., vol. 89 (1901), col. 535.

44 Eldridge, , Victorian Imperialism, p. 13Google Scholar.

45 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 101 (1902), col. 566Google Scholar.

46 Ibid., vol. 89 (1901), cols. 532–33.

47 Ibid., col. 249.

48 Ibid., vol. 101 (1902), col. 384.

49 Field, , Toward a Programme, pp. 9, 12Google Scholar.

50 Davey, Arthur, The British Pro-Boers 1877–1902 (Cape Town, 1978), p. 128Google Scholar; Morgan, Kenneth, Keir Hardie; Radical and Socialist (London, 1975), p. 117Google Scholar; Pelling, Henry, “Wales and the Boer War,” Welsh History Review 4 (December 1969): 363–66Google Scholar.

51 Manchester Guardian, 25 April 1900.

52 Ibid.; South Wales Daily News, 2 January 1901.

53 Y Tyst, 20 Medi 1899.

54 Davey, , British Pro-Boers, p. 147Google Scholar.

55 For contrasting views of Welsh attitudes toward the war see Pelling, , “Wales and the Boer War,” pp. 363–66Google Scholar; Morgan, Kenneth O., “Wales and the Boer War—A Reply,” Welsh History Review 4 (December 1969): 367–80Google Scholar.

56 Davey, , British Pro-Boers, pp. 146–47Google Scholar.

57 Morgan, K. O., “Peace Movements in Wales, 1899–1945,” Welsh History Review 10 (December 1981): 403Google Scholar.

58 South Wales Daily News, 2 January 1901.

59 McCracken, Donal P., “The Irish Literary Movement, Irish Doggerel and the Boer War,” Etudes Irelandaises (Autumn 1995): 98Google Scholar.

60 Davey, , British Pro-Boers, p. 242Google Scholar.

61 McCracken, Donal, “Fenians and Dutch Carpetbaggers; Irish and Afrikaner Nationalisms, 1877–1930,” Eire-Ireland 29 (Fall 1994): 114–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Ibid., p. 114; McCracken, , “The Irish Literary Movement,” pp. 106–07Google Scholar.

63 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 89 (1901), col. 400Google Scholar.

64 Ibid., vol. 101 (1902), col. 381.

65 Ibid., col. 123.

66 Freeman's Journal, 9 February 1899.

67 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 89 (1901), col. 91Google Scholar.

68 Ibid., col. 251.

69 Ibid., vol. 101 (1902), col. 119–20.

70 Ibid., vol. 89 (1901), col. 92.

71 Ibid., col. 92.

72 Porter, Bernard, “The Pro-Boers in Britain,” in The South African War, pp. 252–53Google Scholar.

73 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 101 (1902), col. 120Google Scholar.

74 Ibid., vol. 89 (1901), col. 525.

75 Field, , Toward a Programme, p. 15Google Scholar.

76 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 89 (1901), col. 525Google Scholar.

77 Ibid., col. 251.

78 Porter, Bernard, “The Pro-Boers in Britain,” in The South African War, pp. 252–53Google Scholar.

79 Eldridge, , Victorian Imperialism, p. 16Google Scholar.

80 Parliamentary Debates, 4th sen, vol. 89 (1901), col. 536Google Scholar.

81 Eldridge, , Victorian Imperialism, p. 16Google Scholar.

82 Warwick, , “Aftermath of War,” in The South African War, pp. 335–38Google Scholar.

83 Other veteran Pro-Boers in the cabinet included Morley, John, Bryce, James, Reid, Robert Sir, Ripon, Lord, Burns, John and Harcourt, L. V.; Koss, Stephen, ed. The Pro-Boers: The Anatomy of an Anti-War Movement (Chicago, 1973), p. xxxviiiGoogle Scholar.

84 Hyam, Ronald, “British Imperial Policy and South Africa 1906–1910,” in The South African War, pp. 362–85Google Scholar.

85 Firchow, Peter E., “The Death of the German Cousin: The Great War and Changes in British Literary Views of Germany,” The South Atlantic Quarterly 83 (Spring 1984): 195Google Scholar.

86 Haste, Cate, Keep the Home Fires Burning (London, 1977), p. 3Google Scholar.

87 Stallybrass, Peter and White, Allon, The Politics and Poetics of Transgression (Ithaca, 1986), pp. 5–6Google Scholar; Said, Edward, Orientalism (New York, 1979), p. 7Google Scholar.

88 Fletcher, C. R. L., “The Germans I: Their Empire—How They Made It,” Oxford Pamphlets 1914 (Oxford, 1914), p. 30Google Scholar.

89 Fletcher, C. R. L., “The Germans II: What They Covet,” Oxford Pamphlets 1914 (Oxford, 1914), p. 5Google Scholar.

90 Ibid., p. 9.

91 Ibid., pp. 27–28.

92 Ibid., p. 38.

93 Times, 7 August 1914.

94 Hughes, Clive, “Army Recruitment in Gwynedd, 1914–1916,” (MA. thesis, University College of North Wales Bangor, 1983), p. 236Google Scholar.

95 George, David Lloyd, Through Terror to Triumph! An Appeal to the Nation by the Chancellor of the Exchequer (London, 1914), p. 13Google Scholar.

96 Ibid.

97 South Wales Daily News, 29 September 1914.

98 Freeman's Journal, 26 September 1914.

99 Ibid.

100 Ibid.

101 Gwynne, Denis, The Life of John Redmond (Freeport, 1932), p. 385Google Scholar.

102 SirRaleigh, Walter, “Might is Right,” Oxford War Pamphlets 1914 (Oxford, 1914), p. 9Google Scholar.

103 Fletcher, , “The Germans II,” p. 22Google Scholar.

104 Raleigh, , “Might is Right,” p. 11Google Scholar.

105 George, Lloyd, “Through Terror to Triumph,” p. 12Google Scholar.

106 Welsh Outlook (September 1914): p. 378–79Google Scholar.

107 Kennedy, Paul M., The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism 1860–1914 (London, 1980), p. 387Google Scholar; Firchow, , “Death of the German Cousin,” p. 199Google Scholar.

108 Firchow, , “Death of the German Cousin,” p. 197Google Scholar.

109 Raleigh, , “Might is Right,” p. 14Google Scholar.

110 Ibid., p. 8; Firchow, , “Death of the German Cousin,” p. 197–98Google Scholar; Robertson, J. M., The Germans (London, 1916), pp. 3–112Google Scholar.

111 Kennedy, , Anglo-German Antagonism, p. 390Google Scholar.

112 Raleigh, , “Might is Right,” p. 8Google Scholar; Robertson, , The Germans, pp. 3–112Google Scholar.

113 Fletcher, , “The Germans II,” p. 9Google Scholar.

114 Thomas, , “Wales in the War,” p. 144Google Scholar.

115 “Annerch Llewelyn ap Gruffydd,” recruiting leaflet, C109/10, W.A.C. Papers, National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth; “The Address of Llewelyn ap Gruffydd,” recruiting leaflet, C109/10, W.A.C. Papers, National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth; “Wele Eiriau un o Dywysogion Cymru,” recruiting leaflet, C109/10, W.A.C. Papers, National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth; “The Address of Prince David,” recruiting leaflet, C109/10, W.A.C. Papers, National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth.

116 “Annerch Llewelyn ap Gruffydd,” recruiting leaflet, C109/10, W.A.C. Papers, National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth; “The Address of Llewelyn ap Gruffydd,” recruiting leaflet, C109/10, W.A.C. Papers, National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth.

117 Jones, W. Lewis and Hones, John Morris, eds., Wlad Fyn Nhadau (London, 1915), p. xiiiGoogle Scholar.

118 Redmond, John, “Introduction,” in MacDonagh, Michael, The Irish at the Front (London and New York, 1916), p. 5Google Scholar.

119 “A Priest's Forecast in 1915,” leaflet, OLS papyrus case 54A, Great Britain. Department of Recruiting for Ireland, Trinity College Library, Dublin, Ireland.

120 “To Irishmen,” poster, OLS papyrus case 55C, Great Britain. Department of Recruiting for Ireland. Trinity College Library, Dublin.

121 Beddoes, D. M. and Thomas, D. Vaughan, “Come Alone; Can't You Hear? (Dewch Ymlaen; Oni Chylwch?),” sheet music, 22/40, D. Vaughan Thomas Papers, National Library of WalesGoogle Scholar.

122 Newry Telegraph, 3 June 1915.

123 “Why Mr. Wm. Redmond, M.P. Joined the Army,” recruiting poster, OLS papyrus case 54B. Great Britain. Department of Recruiting for Ireland, Trinity College Library, Dublin.

124 Bew, Paul, Ideology and the Irish Question; Ulster Unionism and Irish Nationalism 1912–1916 (Oxford, 1994), p. 124Google Scholar.

125 Redmond, John, “Introduction,” p. 6Google ScholarPubMed.

126 Bew, , Ideology and the Irish Question, pp. 123–24Google Scholar.

127 Redmond, John, “Introduction,” p. 4Google Scholar.

128 “Appeal from John Redmond, M.P. to the People of Ireland,” leaflet, OLS L-1-540, Great Britain. Department of Recruiting for Ireland, Trinity College Library, Dublin.

129 Redmond, John, “Introduction,” p. 4Google Scholar.

130 “Diary of Events in Ireland,” Appendix IV, typed mss., 49/D/6, Bonar Law Papers, House of Lords Record Office, London, p. 1.

131 Ibid., Appendix III, typed mss., 49/D/6, Bonar Law Papers, House of Lords Record Office, London, p. 5.

132 Ibid.

133 Ibid., p. 2.

134 “Come into the Ranks and Fight,” poster, papyrus case 55C, Great Britain. Department of Recruiting for Ireland, Trinity College Library, Dublin.

135 Denman, , Ireland's Unknown Soldiers, p. 145Google Scholar.

136 Raleigh, , “Might is Right,” p. 12Google Scholar.

137 Watson, William “Wales: A Greeting,” in Land of My Fathers, ed. Jones, W. Lewis and Jones, John Morris (London, 1915), p. 127Google Scholar.

138 Redmond, John, “Introduction,” pp. 5–6Google Scholar.