Article contents
“The Man on the Spot”: Independence of the Australian Governor, 1788-18501
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2014
Extract
Australians recognize distance and isolation as a mold which shaped their history. Geoffrey Blainey observes this in his brilliantly provocative book, The Tyranny of Distance, and points out the consequences of Australia's geographic situation. Australia is at least 12,000 miles from England, and her continental perimeter is another 12,000 miles. Because of slow and uncertain communications between Australia and Whitehall from 1788 to 1850, the governor was really “the man on the spot”; he had often to act more independently than his instructions intended, and at times he defied both Whitehall and the colonists, sometimes at the same time. Although his link with the Colonial Office was direct, the secretaries of state to whom he was responsible changed frequently; yet much of our information comes from the dispatches between these officials.
The colony of New South Wales comprised nearly all of eastern continental Australia until 1850. It was founded as a penal colony in 1788. The commission of the first governor, Arthur Phillip, gave him almost complete autocratic powers over the colony, prompting a military attaché to observe: “I never heard of any one single person having so great power vested in him as the Governor.” This commission stood, with some slight exceptions, for more than thirty years.
Because of these extraordinary powers, the early governors were called autocrats. Although the British government decided how many convicts were to be sent and the colonial secretaries in London issued frequent instructions, the distance and slow mails — three to six-month voyages en route each way — placed the governor in complete control of the colony's expansion. Thus, the disposal of land, labor, and capital depended on each governor's individual discretion. After 1824, when George Arthur became lieutenant governor, Tasmania became independent from New South Wales. Eventually, these two autocratically ruled prison farms became prosperous self-governing colonies after 1850. Meanwhile, Western Australia and South Australia were founded sans convicts in 1829 and 1836, respectively. This paper will deal first with New South Wales, and more briefly with Tasmania, Western Australia, and South Australia.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1971
Footnotes
This article will contain no footnotes except for the longer quotations. The basic source material for the entire article is drawn from the dispatches which flowed between the colonial governors and the Colonial Office. See Frederick Watson (ed.), Historical Records of Australia (1st Series. 26 vols. Canberra, 1914-25; 3rd Series. 6 vols. Canberra, 1921-23; 4th Series. 1 vol. Canberra, 1922).
References
NOTES
2 Melbourne, 1966.
3 Lieutenant Clark Diary, as quoted in Auchmuty, J. J., “Governor Phillip,” Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society, LVI (1970), 89.Google Scholar
4 Clark, C. M. H., A History of Australia, I (Melbourne, 1962), 335.Google Scholar
5 Fitzpatrick, Kathleen, “Mr. Gladstone and the Governor; The Recall of Sir John Eardley-Wilmot from Van Diemen's Land, 1846,” Historical Studies, Australia and New Zealand, I (1940), 36.Google Scholar
6 Rutherford, J., Sir George Grey, K. C. B., 1812-1898, A Study in Colonial Government (London, 1961), 23.Google Scholar
7 Ibid., 66.
- 1
- Cited by