No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2014
In 1965 Kingsley Martin, who had recently retired as editor of the New Statesman, published an article in Encounter entitled “Arguing with Keynes.” Although the self-serving memoir acknowledged Martin's admiration for “the swiftest and most powerful intellect that I have ever met,” it did little to enhance Keynes's reputation, revealing him as an apologist for Chamberlain's appeasement policy. Despite mutual respect, Keynes, the most active and certainly the most vociferous member of the New Statesman board of directors, regularly censured Martin for self-righteousness, complaining on one occasion that he was “perpetually engaged in conducting an indignation meeting.” After a dinner in 1945 at which Keynes castigated him for losing his “intellectual integrity,” the outraged editor retorted that he was “never again going to subject [himself] to [Keynes's] insults,” adding, “I understand now why people hate Maynard so much.”
A version of this article was presented at the joint meeting of the North American and Pacific Coast Conferences on British Studies at Santa Clara University in March 1991. I am grateful to the Rt. Hon. John Freeman for permission to quote from the Kingsley Martin Papers, Mrs. Trekkie Parsons for permission to quote from the Leonard Woolf Papers, Mrs. Elizabeth Inglis of the University of Sussex Library for assistance, and Peter Stansky for comments on the original paper.
1 “Arguing with Keynes: A Memoir,” Encounter, 20, 2 (February 1965): 75Google Scholar.
2 J. M. Keynes to Kingsley Martin, 10 November 1937, quoted in Martin, Kingsley, Editor (London, 1968), pp. 245–46Google Scholar.
3 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 6 July 1945, Woolf Papers, University of Sussex Library.
4 Martin, , Editor, p. 8Google Scholar.
5 Woolf, Leonard, Beginning Again (London, 1964), p. 177Google Scholar.
6 Rolph, C. H., Kingsley: The Life, Letters and Diaries of Kingsley Martin (London, 1973), pp. 199–200Google Scholar.
7 “From Geneva to the Next War,” Political Quarterly, 4, 1 (January—March 1933): 42Google Scholar.
8 Leonard Woolf to Frank Hardie, 29 November 1933, Hardie Papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford University.
9 Leonard Woolf to Philip Noel-Baker, 11 March 1934, Noel-Baker Papers, Churchill College Library, Cambridge University.
10 “A New Foreign Policy for Labour,” Report for the New Fabian Research Bureau, June 1934, Fabian Society Papers, Nuffield College Library, Oxford University.
11 See, for example, “Mussolini or the League” [by Brailsford, H. N.], New Statesman, 6 July 1935Google Scholar.
12 New Statesman, 21 September 1935.
13 Martin, , Editor, p. 171Google Scholar.
14 Hyams, Edward, The New Statesman: The History of the First Fifty Years 1913–1963 (London, 1963), pp. 181–82Google Scholar.
15 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 27 September 1935, Woolf Papers.
16 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 29 September 1935, Spotts, Frederic, ed., Letters of Leonard Woolf (New York, 1989), pp. 400–402Google Scholar.
17 Woolf, Leonard, The League and Abyssinia (London, 1936), p. 26Google Scholar; Advisory Committee on International Questions Memorandum No. 461, February 1936, Labour Party Archive, National Museum of Labour History, Manchester.
18 Advisory Committee on International Questions Memorandum No. 468, July 1936, Labour Party Archive.
19 Advisory Committee on International Questions Memorandum No. 473a, December 1936, Labour Party Archive.
20 “Arms and the Peace,” Political Quarterly, 8, 1 (January—March 1937): 34–35Google Scholar.
21 “The Resurrection of the League,” Political Quarterly, 8, 3 (July—September 1937): 348Google Scholar.
22 Woolf, Leonard, Downhill All the Way (London, 1967), p. 243Google Scholar.
23 Ibid., pp. 246-47.
24 New Statesman, 29 August 1936.
25 New Statesman, 10 July 1937.
26 New Statesman, 26 March 1938.
27 New Statesman, 27 August 1938.
28 Kingsley Martin to J. M. Keynes, 19 September 1938, quoted in Rolph, , Kingsley, p. 248Google Scholar. In Editor Martin claimed that although it was an act of courage to say what was really in the minds of most people, he had chosen a disastrous moment and that “this was a mistake which I was never allowed to forget” (p. 256).
29 New Statesman, 8 October 1938.
30 See Leventhal, F. M., “Seeing the Future: British Left-Wing Travellers to the Soviet Union, 1919-32,” in Bean, J. M. W., ed., The Political Culture of Modern Britain (London, 1987), pp. 224–25Google Scholar.
31 Martin, , “Arguing with Keynes,” p. 76Google Scholar.
32 New Statesman, 5 September 1936.
33 New Statesman, 30 January 1937.
34 New Statesman, 26 December 1936.
35 Martin, , “Arguing with Keynes,” p. 81Google Scholar.
36 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 17 September 1939, Woolf Papers.
37 H. N. Brailsford to Clare Leighton, 9 October 1939, Clare Leighton Papers. See Leventhal, F. M., The Last Dissenter: H. N. Brailsford and His World (Oxford, 1985), p. 270Google Scholar.
38 Martin, , “Arguing with Keynes,” p. 82Google Scholar.
39 Woolf, Leonard, The Journey Not the Arrival Matters (London, 1969), p. 54Google Scholar. Woolf and Martin both contemplated suicide in the event of a German occupation, although Martin also told Brailsford that he would “disguise himself as a clergyman and vanish into the provinces.” H. N. Brailsford to Clare Leighton, 1 June 1940, Clare Leighton Papers.
40 H. N. Brailsford to Clare Leighton, 9 May 1941, Clare Leighton Papers.
41 Nicolson, Harold, Diaries and Letters 1939–45 (London, 1967), p. 221Google Scholar.
42 Martin, , Editor, p. 278Google Scholar.
43 Woolf, , The Journey Not the Arrival Matters, p. 17Google Scholar.
44 Leonard Woolf to H. N. Brailsford, 17 October 1943, Woolf Papers.
45 Leonard Woolf to Beatrice Webb, 17 January 1942, Passfield Papers, BLPES, London School of Economics.
46 New Statesman, 17 May 1941; “How to Make the Peace,” Political Quarterly, 12, 4 (October-December 1941): 373Google Scholar; Woolf, Leonard, The International Post-War Settlement (London, 1944)Google Scholar.
47 “Britain in the Atomic Age,” Political Quarterly, 17, 1 (January-March 1946): 18Google Scholar.
48 Woolf, Leonard, Foreign Policy: The Labour Party's Dilemma (London, 1947)Google Scholar.
49 New Statesman, 15 October 1949.
50 Woolf, Leonard to the Editor of the New Statesman, 16 October 1949Google Scholar, Spotts, , Letters, p. 434Google Scholar.
51 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 17 October 1949, Woolf Papers.
52 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 18 October 1949, Woolf Papers.
53 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 20 October 1949, Martin Papers, University of Sussex Library.
54 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 23 October 1949, Woolf Papers.
55 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 24 October 1949, Spotts, , Letters, p. 435.Google Scholar
56 Woolf, Leonard to the Editor of the New Statesman, 11 November 1951, Woolf PapersGoogle Scholar.
57 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 12 November 1951, Woolf Papers.
58 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 24 November 1951, Spotts, , Letters, p. 436Google Scholar.
59 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 26 November 1951, Woolf Papers.
60 New Statesman, 30 August 1952.
61 Woolf, Leonard to the Editor of the New Statesman, 6 September 1952Google Scholar, Spotts, , Letters, p. 437Google Scholar.
62 New Statesman, 6 September 1952.
63 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 23 August 1953, Martin Papers.
64 New Statesman, 15 August 1953.
65 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 23 August 1953, Martin Papers.
66 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 30 August 1953, Woolf Papers.
67 Hyams, , The New Statesman, p. 267Google Scholar.
68 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 3 August 1956, Martin Papers.
69 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 6 September 1956, Woolf Papers.
70 Hyams, , The New Statesman, p. 283Google Scholar.
71 Memorandum by Kingsley Martin, 24 April 1963, Woolf Papers.
72 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 26 April 1963, Martin Papers.
73 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin (memorandum), 7 May 1963, Martin Papers.
74 Leonard Woolf to Kingsley Martin, 10 May 1963, Martin Papers.
75 Kingsley Martin to Leonard Woolf, 12 May 1963, Martin Papers.
76 Political Quarterly, 40, 3 (July-September 1969): 242, 245Google Scholar.