Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:07:28.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ladies of the Fraternity of Saint George and of the Society of the Garter*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

James L. Gillespie
Get access

Extract

Contemporary society has discovered—or in some cases been forced to discover—the worth of women. Historians have provided valuable insights into the social, cultural, and legal status of women in an effort to highlight the roots of attitudes that have excluded women from positions of power in the western world. Much of this research has focused upon new ways of viewing history, and the fine series of monographs Women in Culture and Society being published by the University of Chicago Press provides a prime example of the new awareness of the distaff side of history. Yet, little attention has been paid to some of the most basic assumptions of past generations of medieval historians about women and society. The claim that male chauvinist attitudes are founded in the primative Germanic concept of a warrior fraternity from which women were physiologically excluded from membership was already hoary when Fritz Kern published his classic account of medieval law and society in 1914. The comitatus band of Tacitus has been seen as a central component of the leitmotiv that produced chivalry. The chivalric love ethic has, of course, received great attention from women's historians, but the chivalric orders into which such views were distilled have been largely ignored.

The traditional view of the chivalric orders as fossilized parodies of the values they espoused so eloquently advocated by Johan Huizinga's The Waning of the Middle Ages still holds the field. Only in the last year have the chivalric orders been rehabilitated as genuine expressions of the human values of their age. The position of women within the tradition of the chivalric orders is worth a look for the intrinsic interest of the subject and for the insights that the investigation provides into the shifts in attitudes toward females over the centuries. The chivalric orders, and the Arthurian legends that inspired them, placed a high value on women, much higher than the earlier chansons de geste. While it is true that this tradition tended to place the lady upon a pedestal from which her daughters have fought to climb down, the greatest and longest lasting of these late-medieval chivalric fraternities, the Order of the Garter, also gave women a role in its celebrations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , Fall 1985 , pp. 259 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Professors Michael R. Powicke, Klaus P. Jankofsky, and Judith A. Trolander provided insights and inspiration on matters chivalric, Arthurian and feminist. Thanks are also due to lane Roberts and Desirée Tango for technical assistance.

References

1 Kern, Fritz, Kingship and Law, trans. Chrimes, S.B., (New York, 1956), p. 23.Google Scholar

2 Keen, Maurice, Chivalry (New Haven, 1984), pp. 198–199.Google Scholar

3 Pote, Joseph, The History and Antiquities of Windsor Castle and the Royal College, and Chapel of St. George: With the Institution, Laws, and Ceremonies of the Most Noble Order of the Garter (Eton, 1749), pp. 130–32Google Scholar; Keen, Maurice, “Huizinga, Kilgour and the Decline of Chivalry, Medievalia et Humanistica, New Ser. 8 (1977): 7–8.Google Scholar

4 Loomis, Roger S., “Edward I, Arthurian Enthusiast,” Speculum 28: (1953): 114–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar; van Velthem, Lodewijk, Spiegel Historiael, 2 vols. (Brussels, 1931), 2: 187–91Google Scholar; cf. Hoogenhout, N.M., Untersuchungen zu Lodewijk van Velthem's Spiegel Historiael (Leiden, 1902).Google Scholar

5 Ellis, Henry, ed., The Chronicles of John Hardyng (London, 1812), p. 46.Google Scholar

6 Galway, Margaret, “Joan of Kent and the Order of the Garter, “University of Birmingham Historical Journal 1 (1947): 13–50Google Scholar argues for the veracity of the story, but her account is challenged by Richard Barber, W., Edward, Prince of Wales and Aquitaine (New York, 1978), pp. 85–87Google Scholar. The most recent examinations of the questions, Vale, Juliet, Edward HI and Chivalry (London, 1982)Google Scholar and Keen, , Chivalry, p. 194Google Scholar, reject the story.

7 Wright, Thomas, ed., Political Poems and Songs Relating to English History, From the Accession of Edward III to that of Richard II, 2 vols. (London, 1859–1861), 1: 1–25.Google Scholar

8 Anstis, John, The Register of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, From its Cover in Black Velvet, Usually Called the Black Book, 2 vols. (London, 1724), 1: xxxiii, 27-28, 37–38.Google Scholar

9 Ibid, 1: 210 n.i.

10 Ashmole, Elias, The Institution, Laws & Ceremonies of the Most Noble Order of the Garter; and A Brief Account of All Other Military Orders of Knighthood in England, Scotland, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, Swedeland, Denmark, & C. With the Ensigns of the Several Orders (London, 1693), pp. 125–26.Google Scholar

11 Luraby, J.R., ed., Henrici Knighton Leycestrensis Chronicon, 2 vols. (London, 1889–1895), 2: 57–58Google Scholar; cf. Dunn-Pateson, R.P., The Black Prince (New York, 1910), pp. 108–109.Google Scholar

12 Nicolas, Nicholas Harris, History of the Orders of Knighthood of the British Empire; of the Order of the Guelphs of Hanover; and of the Medals, Clasps, and Crosses, Conferred for Naval and Military Services, 4 vols. (London, 1842), 2: 484 n. 1Google Scholar; Keen, , Chivalry, p. 193 n. 60.Google Scholar

13 British Library, Harleian MS, 40 d. 15; Anstis, 2: 123 n.n.

14 Beltz, George Frederick, Memorials of the Order of the Garter from Its Foundation to the Present Time with Biographical Notices of the Knights in the Reigns of Edward III and Richard II. (London, 1841), p. 10Google Scholar; P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice] E. 101/397/20.

15 Ibid, p. 245; Anstis, 2: 122-29.

16 Napier, Henry Alfred, Historical Notices of the Parishes of Swyncome and Ewelme in the County of Oxford (Oxford, 1858), p. 102Google Scholar. I owe this reference to the kindness of Professor Jankofsky.

17 Ashmole, p. 218; Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2: 499Google Scholar. Beltz, p. ccxxi speculates that the countess in question was Antigona, the wife of the second earl and the natural daughter of Humphrey, duke of Gloucester.

18 P.R.O.E. 101/400/12.

19 P.R.O.E. 101/400/18.

20 P.R.O.E. 404/14-60, Anstis, 2: 128 n.u.

21 P.R.O. E. 101/401/4; Ashmole, p. 217.

22 I.e. de Troyes, Chretien, Cliges, vv. 169–234Google Scholar; cf. Keen, pp. 7-8.

23 Cf. Withington, Robert, English Pageantry: An Historical Outline, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass., 1918), 1: 144.Google Scholar

24 P.R.O. E. 101/401/4. The grant to Lady le Despecer is cancelled with the notation “sine war.” Constance was, however, clearly a recipient of Robes of the Garter in the following year.

25 P.R.O. E. 101/401/14.

26 P.R.O. E. 403/561; Devon, Frederick, ed & trans., Issues of the Exchequer (London, 1837), p. 265.Google Scholar

27 Anstis, 1: 11 n.c; Beltz, p. 250.

28 Beltz, p. 250 n. 6.

29 Nicolas, Nicholas Harris, ed., P[roceedings and Ordinances of the] P[rivy] C[ouncil of England], (London, 1834–1837), 1:14Google Scholar. Fellows, Edmund H., The Knights of the Garter 1348-1939. With a Complete List of the Stall-Plates in St. George's Chapel (London, n.d.), p. 105Google Scholar identifies the Lady Gomeneys as the widow of John de Geaux rather than the widow of John's son.

30 Anstis 1: 12 n.3. For Richard's anger with William Beauchamp over his refusal to help Pole see Knighton, 2: 251; cf. Roskell, J.S., The Impeachment of Michael de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, in 1386 in the Context of the Reign of Richard II (Manchester, 1984), p. 199.Google Scholar

31 Lumby, J.R., ed., Polychronicon Ranulphi Higden, 9 vols. (London, 1886), 9: 181, 198Google Scholar; Stow, George B. Jr., ed., Historia Vitae et Regni Ricardi Secundi (Philadelphia, 1977), p. 197 n. 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 P.R.O. E. 101/401/12.

33 P.R.O. E. 101/403/5.

34 P.R.O. E. 101/403/19.

35 C[alendar] [of] P[atent] [Rolls], 1396-1399, p. 175.

36 Historia Vitae et Regni Ricardi Secundi, pp. 154, 159, 207 n. 434.

37 C.P.R., 1396-1399, pp. 533, 552.

38 Ibid., p. 46.

39 Beltz, pp. ccxxi-ccxxiv; Fellows, pp. 103-109; Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2: lxxvii–lxxxiGoogle Scholar. All these lists of the Ladies of the Garter are imperfect. I shall pass over the specifics lest I be accused of the anal-erotic fixations common to prosopographers.

40 P.R.O. E. 101/404/13.

41 P.R.O. E. 101/405/13.

42 cf. Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2: lxxx.Google Scholar

43 P.R.O. E. 101/406/28.

44 P.R.O. E. 101/405/11; P.R.O. E. 101/405/13.

45 Beltz, p. ccxxiii; Fellows, p. 107; Wylie, James H., History of England under Henry the Fourth, 4 vols. (London, 1884–1898)Google Scholar passim; Kirby, John L., Henry IV of England (London, 1971) passimGoogle Scholar; Nicolas, John, ed., A Collection of the Wills of the Kings and Queens of England from William the Conqueror to Henry VII (London, 1780), p. 203.Google Scholar

46 Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2: lxxx.Google Scholar

47 Wylie, passim.

48 C.P.R., 1405-1408, pp. 107, 164.

49 C.P.R., 1408-1413, p. 382.

50 Ibid., p. 90; P.R.O. E. 101/405/3.

51 P.R.O. E. 101/405/22.

52 Anstis 1: 14 n; the great wardrobe account is fragmentary, P.R.O. E. 101/405/15.

53 P.R.O. E. 101/407/9.

54 P.R.O. E. 101/407/16.

55 Anstis, 2: 124: P.P.C., 4: 116: for Alice's ties to the Beauforts, her friendship with Margaret of Anjou and her role in the factional intrigue of Henry VI's reign see Metcalfe, C.A.. “Alice Chaucer, duchess of Suffolk, c. 1404-1475” (B.A. Thesis, Keele University, 1970)Google Scholar; Griffiths, Ralph A., The Reign of King Henry VI (Berkeley, 1981), passimGoogle Scholar; Gillespie, J.L., “Refectio Eboraca Gubernationis” (A.B. Thesis, Kenyon College, 1968).Google Scholar

56 Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2: xxxviGoogle Scholar; cf. P.R.O. E. 101/408/17.

57 Vickers, K.H., Humphrey Duke of Gloucester (London, 1907), p. 248Google Scholar; for the politicization of the Order of the Garter see Milner, J.D., “The Order of the Garter in the Reign of Henry VI, 1422-1461” (M.A. Thesis, Manchester University, 1972)Google Scholar; Griffiths, p. 251.

58 Roll of New Year's Gifts, 18 Hen. VI printed by Anstis, 2: 128.

59 P.R.O. E. 101/408/17.

60 P.R.O. E. 101/409/2.

61 Nicolas, Orders of Knighthood, 2: lxxx.

62 Ibid, 2: xlviii; P.R.O. E. 101/409/19.

63 Beltz, p. ccxxiv and Fellows, pp. 108-109 list Queen Margaret, lady Anne Moleyns, lady de Say, lady de Beauchamp and Alice Norreys as recipients of Robes of Garter in 1448. This is based, however, upon a misreading of the great wardrobe account which after reciting the recipients of robes, lists the queen, lady Anne Molyns, Alice Norreys and lords (sic) Say and Beauchamp as well as several others as recipients of “divers res … de dons domini Regis” P.R.O. E. 101/409/18; Nicolas, Orders of Knighthood, 2: lxxxi n.

64 P.R.O. E. 101/411/13.

65 Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2: 498.Google Scholar

66 Anstis, 1: 196-98 n.t.; Stow, John, The Annales or A General Chronicle of England (London, 1615), p. 429Google Scholar; Ashmole, p. 549; Pote, pp. 324-25. For Edward IV's interest in St. George's Chapel see Dugdale, William, Monasticon Anglicanum, 3 vols. (London, 1655–1673), 3: 71 et seq.Google Scholar

67 P.R.O. E. 101/412/15; Anstis, 1: 210 n.i.

68 P.R.O. E. 101/413/1; British Library, Cotton MSS. Julius 12, p. 46.

69 quoted by Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2: 497.Google Scholar

70 P.R.O. E. 101/416/9.

71 Beltz, p. cxi; Ashmole, p. 218.

72 Anstis, 2: 128-29.

73 Nicolas, , Orders of Knighthood, 2:503Google Scholar; Fellows, pp. 102-103.

74 Keen, , Chivalry, p. 193Google Scholar; Tuchman, Barbara, A Distant Mirror (New York, 1978), p. 216Google Scholar; The author's involvement in these sorts of problems is best summarized by Hutch, Ronald K., The Radical Lord Radnor: The Public Life of Viscount Folkestone, Third Earl of Radnor (1779-1869) (Minneapolis, 1977), p. 56.Google Scholar