Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:58:51.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

James Ussher and “Ussherian” Episcopacy, 1640–1656: The Primate and His Reduction Manuscript

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

William M. Abbott
Get access

Extract

The most important contribution made by Archbishop James Ussher to the ecclesiastical developments of the Interregnum and Restoration periods was his short tract The Reduction of Episcopacy Unto the Form of Synodical Government. Printed only after his death in 1656, its combination of ministerial synods with episcopal rule was seen as a basis for presbyterian-episcopal reconciliation over the next three decades. The tract was printed in five editions during the later 1650s, and came out in two more editions in 1679, when the Popish Plot and the calling of a new Parliament revived hopes that dissenters could be comprehended within the Church of England. It was printed once more in 1689, in Edinburgh, when “comprehension” was again being hotly debated in both England and Scotland. By that time Ussher's name had come to symbolize such “limited” or “primitive” episcopacy, and indeed it has continued to do so among twentieth-century historians.

The fame of the Reduction rests upon its content and authorship. Although the tract was only one of many such compromises offered during the Interregnum, it was the most radical to come from the royalist and Anglican side during that period. Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of all Ireland, Ussher was admired and respected by radical puritans and major Laudian spokesmen such as Henry Hammond and Bishop John Bramhall. The power of Ussher's name in this context was shown in 1685, when the nonconformist divine and politician Richard Baxter was on trial for allegedly making a printed attack against the king and the bishops. When Baxter's attorney, Sir Henry Pollexfen, sought to introduce as evidence one of Baxter's own printed compromises between episcopal and presbyterian government, Lord Chief Justice George Jeffreys replied, “I will see none of his books; it is for primitive Episcopacy, I will warrant you — a bishop in every parish.” In replying “Nay, my lord, it is the same with Archbishop Usher's,” Pollexfen indicated both the radical nature of the Reduction and the legitimacy that Ussher's name lent to other compromises of this kind.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Summer 1990 , pp. 237 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In addition to appearing under the Reduction title, the tract was included in The Judgement of the Late Arch-Bishop of Armagh, ed. Bernard, Nicholas (London, 1657)Google Scholar, and also appeared under the title Episcopal and Presbylerial Government Conjoyned. See Wing, Donald, Short-Title Catalogue, 3 vols. (New York, 1951), 3: 412–13.Google Scholar

2 See Cross, Claire, “The Church in England, 1646–1660,” in The Interregnum, ed. Aylmer, G. E. (London, 1972), p. 120Google Scholar; Simon, Walter G., The Restoration Episcopate (New York, 1965), pp. 105–06.Google Scholar

3 Baxter, Richard, The Autobiography of Richard Baxter, Abridged by Thomas, J. M. Lloyd, ed. Keeble, N. H. (London, 1985), pp. 260–261.Google Scholar

4 Bernard, Nicholas, “To the Reader,” in Ussher, James, The Reduction of Episcopacy Unto the Form of Synodical Government Recieved in the Ancient Church: Proposed in the year 1641 as an Expedient for the prevention of those Troubles, which afterwards did arise about the matter of Church-Government (London, pr. by E. C. for Royston, Richard, 1656).Google Scholar

5 Baxter, Richard, Reliquiae Baxterianae, Or Mr. Richard Baxter's Narrative of the Most Memorable passages of his Life and Times, ed. Sylvester, Matthew, 2 bks. (London, 1696), 1: 206.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 1: 62.

7 Ibid., 1: 244.

8 Trevor-Roper, H. R., “James Ussher, Archbishop of Armagh,” in Catholics, Anglicans, and Puritans: Seventeenth Century Essays (London, 1987), p. 151.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., pp. 124–39, 150–53, 164–65.

10 SirD'Ewes, Simonds, The Journal of Sir Simonds D'Ewes, ed. Notestein, Wallace (New Haven, 1923), p. 458.Google Scholar

11 Ussher, , The Whole Works of the Most Rev. James Ussher, ed. Elrington, Charles R., 17 vols. (Dublin, 1864), 1: 207–08Google Scholar; Dr.Read, Thomas to Read, Robert, 3 August 1640, Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, of the Reign of Charles I, 1640 (London, 1880), p. 550.Google Scholar

12 See Knox, R. Buick, James Ussher, Archbishop of Armagh (Cardiff, 1967), pp. 45–46, 76–77, 97, 186–87Google Scholar; Trevor-Roper, , “Ussher,” pp. 120–21, 140, 148–49Google Scholar; Baillie, Robert, “Preface,” in A Large Supplement to the Canterburians' Self-Conviction (London, 1641), p. 2.Google Scholar

13 See Laud to Bramhall, 11 May 1635, Historical Manuscripts Commission, Report on the Manuscripts of the late Reginald Rawdon Hastings, ed. Bickley, Francis, 4 vols. (London, 1930–1947), 4: 68Google Scholar; Lettice Viscountess Falkland to Lucy Lady Hastings, May 1641, ibid., 2: 82; Knox, , Ussher, pp. 45–46, 48–51, 58, 64, 186Google Scholar; Trevor-Roper, , “Ussher,” p. 140.Google Scholar

14 See Bramhall to Ussher, 10 January [?1636–37], Historical Manuscripts Commission, Report on the Manuscripts of…Hastings, 4: 71Google Scholar; Ussher to Bramhall, 28 February 1640, 7 May 1640, and 29 July 1640, ibid., 4: 86–89; Ussher, , Whole Works, 1: 232.Google Scholar

15 See statements by the M.P. and diarist Sir Simonds D'Ewes in 1641: British Library, D'Ewes' Diary, 22 March 1641, Harlcian MSS, 162, fols. 346v–47r; ibid., 12 June 1641, Harleian MSS, 163, fol. 309r.

16 Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, of the Reign of Charles I, 1640–41, ed. Hamilton, William D. (London, 1882), pp. 484–85.Google Scholar

17 Shaw, William A., A History of the English Church during the Civil Wars and under the Commonwealth, 1640–1660, 2 vols. (London, 1900) 1: 64–66Google Scholar; B.L., Diary of a Bishop, 12 March 1641, Harleian MSS, 6424, fol. 49.

18 Fuller, Thomas, The Church-History of Britain (London, 1655), bk. 11, p. 175.Google Scholar

19 Ussher, , “The Reduction of Episcopacie,” p. 14Google Scholar, in The Judgement of the Late Arch-Bishop of Armagh, ed. Bernard, Nicholas (London, 1657).Google Scholar

20 Bernard, Nicholas, “To the Reader,” in Ussher, , Reduction.Google ScholarPubMed

21 Bernard, Nicholas, Clavi Trabales (London, pr. by Hodgkinson, R., 1661), p. 54.Google Scholar

22 Gardiner, S. R., The History of England from the accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War, 1603–1642, 10 vols. (London 1884), 9: 387.Google Scholar

23 Sykes, Norman, Old Priest and New Presbyter (Cambridge, 1956), p. 134Google Scholar; Lamont, William, Richard Baxter and the Millenium (London, 1979), p. 212Google Scholar; Shaw, , History of the English Church, 1: 68–69Google Scholar; Spalding, James C. and Brass, Maynard F., “Reduction of Episcopacy as a Means to Unity in England, 1640–1662,” Church History 30 (December 1961): 417, 428CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Knox, , Ussher, p. 59Google Scholar; see also Greaves, Richard L., Saints and Rebels (Macon, Ga., 1985), p. 15.Google Scholar

24 Mendle, Michael, Dangerous Positions (University, Ala., 1985), p. 142.Google Scholar

25 Trevor-Roper, , “Ussher,” p. 151.Google Scholar

26 B.L., Diary of a Bishop, 2 July 1641, Harleian MSS, 6424, fols. 79–80; Journals of the House of Lords, 4: 296.Google Scholar

27 Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625–1660, ed. Gardiner, S. R. (3rd ed.; Oxford, 1906), pp. 170–78.Google Scholar

28 Dering presented his plan in a printed speech of 21 June and in several anonymous tracts. See Rushworth, John, Historical Collections. The Third Part. In two Volumes (London, 1692), 1: 294–95Google Scholar; Dering, Edward Sir, A Collection of Speeches made…in matter of Religion (London, 1642), p. 57Google Scholar; The Order and Forme for Church Government by Bishops and the Clergie of this Kingdome Voted in the House of Commons on Friday, July 16, 1641 (London, 1641)Google Scholar; Master Grimston's Argument Concerning Bishops…Also severall Orders, concerning Church Government (London, 1641)Google Scholar. I am grateful to Dr. Michael Mendle for help in dating the latter two tracts.

29 Ussher, , Reduction, pp. 4–7.Google Scholar

30 The Liverpool M.P. John Moore copied one of Dering's tracts into his diary of late June, July, and August (B.L., Diary of John Moore, Harleian MSS, 479, fols. 173v–175r).

31 Knox, , Ussher, p. 172.Google Scholar

32 Milton, , The Complete Prose Works of John Milton, ed. Wolfe, D. M., 8 vols. (New Haven, 1953), 1: 104Google Scholar; Mendle, , Dangerous Positions, pp. 142, 144Google Scholar, and Trevor-Roper, , “Ussher,” p. 151.Google Scholar

33 Bernard wrote in 1656 that “of late” he had found it subscribed by Ussher and Richard Holdsworth (Bernard, , “To the Reader,” in Ussher, , ReductionGoogle Scholar).

34 Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 62.Google Scholar

35 According to this letter, Bernard had either told Gauden of the Reduction plan or given him a manuscript copy from among Ussher's papers. Gauden refers to the plan, however, as having been “described and proposed sometime in his [Ussher's] papers” (Gauden to Bernard, September 1656, Thurloe, John, A Collection of State Papers, ed. Birch, T., 7 vols. [London, 1742], 5: 599Google Scholar).

36 Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 206.Google Scholar

37 In a 1965 article George Abernathy assumes that John Gauden is referring to the year 1641 when, in a letter to Bernard of 1656, he speaks of a limited episcopacy “which then seemed consented to.” In fact, Gauden is referring to a meeting of presbyterian leaders that had taken place only recently (“The English Presbyterians and the Stuart Restoration 1648–1663,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n. s. 55, pt. 2 [May 1965]: 14Google Scholar; Gauden to Bernard, 1656, Thurloe, , Collection of State Papers, 5: 598Google Scholar).

38 Sir John Temple to the Earl of Leicester, 21 January 1641, Historical Manuscripts Commission, Report on the Manuscripts of the Right Honourable Viscount De L'Isle, ed. Owen, G. D., 6 vols. (London, 1966), 6: 368.Google Scholar

39 Baillie to Irvine Presbytery, 28 December 1640, Baillie, Robert, The Letters and Journals of Robert Baillie, ed. Laing, David, 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1841), 1: 287.Google Scholar

40 Baillie to Irvine Presbytery, 15 March 1641, ibid., 1: 309.

41 The Thomason Tract catalogue assigns this tract to January 1641, but only tentatively; see Catalogue of the Pamphlets, Books, Newspapers, and Manuscripts…Collected by George Thomason, 1640–1661, 2 vols. (Kraus Reprint, 1969), 1: 7Google Scholar. According to the title page of the tract, it was printed “in the yeare, 1641,” which suggests, given the common use of Old Style at the time, that the work was printed after 24 March.

42 Manuscript collections examined include the Additional, Harleian, Egerton, Sloane, and Stowe (British Library); the Advocates' Library and Wodrow (National Library of Scotland); and the Clarendon and Tanner (Bodleian Library, Oxford). The Tanner Manuscripts include letters written in 1640 and 1641 by Ussher's associates William Sancroft, William Bedell, John Davenant, William Twisse, William Dillingham, and Gerard Vossius, but there is no reference in any of them to a Reduction-style tract.

43 See Milton, , Complete Prose Works, 1: 78–80, 961–65Google Scholar. “Smectymnuus” is an acronym; these three divines' initials provide the first six letters.

44 See ibid., 1: 115.

45 Hales, , The Way Towards the Finding of a Decision of The chiefe Controversie now debated concerning Church Government (London, 1641), pp. 2, 39.Google Scholar

46 Parker, , The question concerning the divine right of episcopacie truly stated (London, 1641), “Epistie Dedicatory,” and p. 11 of text.Google Scholar

47 Ussher to the Bishop of Derry, 1641, The Rawdon Papers, ed. Berwick, Edward (London, 1819), pp. 81–86.Google Scholar

48 du Moulin, Lewis, Vox Populi, Expressed in XXXV Motions (1641), pp. 1–2, 8–9.Google Scholar

49 Fuller, Thomas, The Church-History of Britain (London, 1655), bk. 11, pp. 174–76, 182Google Scholar; Knox, , Ussher, p. 57.Google Scholar

50 Hacket, John, Scrinia Reserata: A Memorial Offer'd to the Great Deservings of John Williams, D.D., 2 parts (London, 1693), 2: 144–47.Google Scholar

51 Thomas, G. W., “Archbishop John Williams,” (D. Phil, thesis, Oxford University, 1974), pp. 305–06Google Scholar; B.L., Diary of John Moore, 12 May 1641, Harleian MSS, 477, fol. 60v.

52 B.L., Diary of John Moore, (no date of entry), Harleian MSS, 479, fols. 173v–175r; B.L., Diary of a Bishop, 2 July 1641, Harleian MSS, 6424, fols. 79–80.

53 D'Ewes, , The Journal of Sir Simonds D'Ewes, p. 343Google Scholar; D'Ewes, to his wife, 10 December 1640, The Autobiography and Correspondence of Sir Symonds D'Ewes, Bart., ed. Halliwell, J. O., 2 vols. (London, 1845), 2: 252–53.Google Scholar

54 Nalson, John, Impartial Collection of the Great Affairs of State, 2 vols. (London, 1682–1883), 2: 298–300.Google Scholar

55 See Russell, Conrad, “The Authorship of the Bishop's Diary of the House of Lords in 1641,” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 41 (November 1968): 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 B.L., Diary of a Bishop, 12 March, 9 April, and 2 July 1641, Harleian MSS, 6424, fols. 49, 54, 79–80.

57 Spalding, and Brass, , “Reduction,” Church History 30 (December 1961): 422.Google Scholar

58 A Modest Offer of Some meet Considerations tendered to the Learned Prolocutor (1644), pp. 10–15Google Scholar. “Philalethirenaeus” was the pseudonym.

59 Spalding, and Brass, , “Reduction,” p. 422.Google ScholarPubMed

60 Rushworth, , Historical Collections. The Third Part, 2: 872–73.Google Scholar

61 Knox, , Ussher, p. 73Google Scholar; Oudart, N., “A diary of passages at the treaty of Newport…From the original MS diary of Nicholas Oudart,” in Desiderata Curiosa, ed. Peck, Francis, 2 vols. (London, 1779), 2: 405Google Scholar; A Detection of the Falsehood in a Pamphlet intituled, a message from the Isle of Wight (1648), pp. 2–5.Google Scholar

62 A Message from the Isle of Wight, brought by Major Cromwell, and read in the House of Commons (London, 1648), pp. 1–2Google Scholar; A Detection of the Falsehood in a Pamphlet intituled, a message from the Isle of Wight (1648), pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

63 Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 206.Google Scholar

64 B.L., D'Ewes' Diary, 12 May 1641, Harleian MSS, 163, fols. 165v–67r, 168v–70r; Fuller, Thomas, Church-History of Britain (London, 1655), bk. 11, pp. 176–79.Google Scholar

65 Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 206.Google Scholar

66 See Shaw, , History of the English Church, 1: 15–26.Google Scholar

67 Ussher, , Whole Works, 1: 208.Google Scholar

68 Nalson, , Great Affairs of State, 1: 735–36.Google Scholar

69 Ussher had visited the king frequently in mid- and late-1640; see SirWentworth, George to the Bishop of Derry, 11 June 1640, Rawdon Papers, p. 78Google Scholar. For an extensive treatment of Ussher's political and theological conservatism, see Knox, , Ussher, pp. 22–23, 54–60, 122–28, 140–54, 167–89.Google Scholar

70 Bernard, , Clavi Trabales, p. 54.Google Scholar

71 Knox, , Ussher, pp. 27–28, 33, 41–44, 46, 60, 90–93, 95–96, 182–85Google Scholar; Sykes, Norman, “Ussher as Churchman,” Hermathena 88 (November 1956): 74–75Google Scholar; Shuckburgh, E. S., Two Biographies of William Bedell (Cambridge, 1902), pp. 114, 118Google Scholar; Mant, Richard, History of the Church of Ireland (London, 1840), pp. 461–64Google Scholar; Bernard, , Clavi Trabales, pp. 53–55.Google Scholar

72 See Trevor-Roper, , “Ussher,” pp. 139–144, 150–52.Google Scholar

73 See Knox, , Ussher, pp. 41–43, 41, 45–46, 48–51, 92, 94–95, 186, 188Google Scholar; Mant, , History of the Church of Ireland, pp. 507–508Google Scholar; Bernard, , Clavi Trabales, p. 53.Google Scholar

74 Ussher to the Bishop of Derry, 1641, The Rawdon Papers, p. 82.Google Scholar

75 B.L., newsletter, 6 June 1641, Sloane MSS, 1467, f. 94.

76 Ussher to the Bishop of Derry, 1641, The Rawdon Papers, pp. 82, 85.Google Scholar

77 Ussher, , The Iudgement of Dr. Rainoldes touching the Originall of Episcopacy (London, 1641), p. 8Google Scholar and passim. The tract appeared around 25 May, according to Donald Wolfe, in Milton, , The Complete Prose Works, 1: 104.Google Scholar

78 Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series…1641–43, p. 489; Ussher to Ward, 22 June 1642, Tanner Letters, ed. McNeil, C. (Dublin, 1943), p. 149.Google Scholar

79 Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum, 1642–1660, ed. Firth, C. H. and Rait, R. S., 3 vols. (London, 1911), 1: 182Google Scholar; Journals of the House of Commons 1547–1714, 17 vols. (London, 1742), 3: 273.Google Scholar

80 See Ussher, , The Soveraignes Power and the Subjects Duty (Oxford, 1644).Google Scholar

81 Journals of the House of Commons, 4: 378Google Scholar; B.L., Diary of Lawrence Whitacre, 16 December 1645, Add. MSS, 31116, fol. 248v.

82 Knox, , Ussher, p. 72.Google Scholar

83 Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 206.Google Scholar

84 Bod1eian Library, newsletter, 20 November 1648, Clarendon MSS, 31, fol. 313.

85 Parr, Richard, The life of…James Usher, late Lord Arch-Bishop of Armagh (London, 1686), pp. 69, 71Google Scholar. Parr's statements are borne out by A Message from the Isle of Wight.

86 Parr, , The life of Usher, p. 66.Google Scholar

87 Ussher at Oatlands, 16 August 1647, Tanner Letters, pp. 258–59.Google ScholarPubMed

88 Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, pp. 217, 149, 206.Google Scholar

89 Ussher to Henry Hammond, 21 July 1650, Ussher, , Whole Works, 16: 156Google Scholar; Henry King to Ussher, 30 October 1651, ibid., 16: 199.

90 Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 2: 197.Google Scholar

91 Waring, Robert, 11 November 1654, Tanner Letters, pp. 388–89.Google Scholar

92 Bernard, , “To the Reader,” Reduction (1656, pr. for Royston, R.).Google ScholarPubMed

93 Gauden to Bernard, September 1656, Thurloe, John, Collection of State Papers, 5: 599Google Scholar; Diary of a Bishop, 12 March 1641, Harleian MSS, 6424, fol. 49; SirWalker, Edward, ed., “Perfect Copies of all the Votes,” in Historical discourses upon several occasions, ed. Clopton, H. (London, 1705), p. 77Google Scholar; Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 172.Google Scholar

94 Gauden, , Hieraspistes (London, 1653), pp. 263, 271, 268.Google Scholar

95 Gauden, , A Sermon preached In the Temple Chappel, at the Funeral of…Dr. Brownrig (London, 1660), pp. 62–63Google Scholar; Gauden, , Hieraspistes, p. 273.Google Scholar

96 Ibid., p. 274.

97 D'Ewes, , Journal, pp. 464–65 n 6Google Scholar; Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 172.Google Scholar

98 Ibid., 1: 176.

99 Ibid., 1: 172.

100 The practice could be violated in cases of “flat necessity” (Baxter, , Reliquiae Baxterianae, 1: 173Google Scholar).

101 Baxter, , Christian Concord, p. 54.Google Scholar

102 Ibid., pp. 61–62, 83.

103 See statements by D'Ewes, William Cage, Denzil Holies, an anonymous speaker, John Pym, and Sir Edward Dering: B.L., D'Ewes' Diary, 27 May 1641, Harleian MSS, 163, fols. 237v, 239r; B.L., Diary of John Moore, 27 May 1641, Harleian MSS, 477, fol. 108r; ibid., 3 June 1641, fol. 122r; Dering, , Collection of Speeches (London, 1642), p. 66.Google Scholar

104 Whitelocke, Bulstrode, Memorials of the English Affairs (Oxford, 1853) 2: 218, 250, 259Google Scholar; Knox, , Ussher, pp. 72–73.Google Scholar