Article contents
Heroism, Heroics and the Making of Heroes: The Anglo-Zulu War of 1879
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2017
Extract
In recent years a number of studies have examined the function of heroic narratives in the propaganda of empire and the construction of “Britishness.” Graham Dawson has argued that such narratives “became myths of nationhood itself providing a cultural focus around which the national community could cohere.” In the light of the nineteenth-century chivalric ideal, the Victorian military hero was expected to be “the embodiment of the virtues of bravery, loyalty, courtesy, generosity, modesty, purity, and compassion, and endowed with an indelible sense of noblesse oblige towards women, children and social inferiors.” The English and upper-class image of the “British” hero served, among other things, to inculcate these supposedly English characteristics in the Irish, Scottish, and Welsh. Courage was taken for granted as the essential characteristic of British imperial officers in the Victorian period but, while courage is a personal quality and is not in itself a quality belonging to the public domain, heroism is, by contrast, something definitionally public. The courageous man becomes a hero only when he is declared to be one. The roots of the hero are in dramatic narrative, which spans the epic myth and the reality of war. The hero is “made” whether in a dramatic fiction or in the representation of events, though the latter produces the problem of molding reality to the requirements of the genre. Military heroes in the genre of the imperial adventure story and in the representation of “real” events are hardly distinguishable, for they are “made” to serve the same purposes. The hero is part of a story and, as Northrop Frye has argued, that story or langue has certain generic features throughout history. On the other hand, though the hero is made, the individual can, and often did, prepare and present himself for the role.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1998
Footnotes
I would like to thank the participants at the York Conference in Cultural Studies on “Exemplary Lives,” in particular Professor John MacKenzie, in April 1997 for their unwitting contribution to this article.
References
1 Dawson, Graham, Soldier Heroes (London, 1994), p.10Google Scholar.
2 Richards, Jeffrey, “Introduction” in Imperialism and Juvenile Literature, ed. idem, (Manchester, 1989), p.6Google Scholar.
3 Imperialism and Popular Culture, ed. John M. MacKenzie (Manchester, 1986).
4 Lieven, M., “Contested Empire: Bertram Mitford and the Imperial Adventure Story,” Paradigm(forthcoming)Google Scholar.
5 MacKenzie, John M., “Heroic Myths of Empire,” in Popular Imperialism and the Military, 1850-1950, ed. idem (Manchester, 1992), p. 112Google Scholar.
6 6 Daily Telegraph, 11 Feb. 1879. See also ibid 12 Feb. 1879, 14 Feb. 1879, 17 Feb. 1879.
7 General SirSmith-Dorrien, Horace, Memories of Forty-Eight Years Service (London, 1925), p. 18Google Scholar.
8 The Times, 6 Feb. 1879. See also Daily News, 17 Feb. 1879; The Standard, 2 Apr. 1879.
9 Zululand at War 1879: the Conduct of the Anglo-Zulu War, ed. Sonia Clarke (Houghton, 1984), pp. 131-32.
10 The Graphic, 15 Mar. 1879.
11 Lloyd’s Weekly, 23 Mar. 1879.
12 Coghill, Patrick Whom the Gods Love: A Memoir of Lieutenant Nevill Josiah Aylmer Coghill (Halesowen, n.d.), p. 120Google Scholar.
13 Smith-Dorrien, Memories, p. 16.
14 Zulu Dawn (1979) directed by Douglas Hickox. This film covers the war up to the end of the Battle of Isandlwana.
15 SirWolseley’s, Garnet South African Journal, ed. Preston, Adrian (Capetown, 1973), pp. 256–57Google Scholar.
16 Ibid., p. 70.
17 Zulu, (1964) directed by Cy Enfield. The film opens with the British defeat at Isandlwana and celebrates the heroic defence of Rorkes Drift.
18 The Standard, 11 May 1879.
19 The Daily Telegraph, 7 Mar. 1879.
20 Holme, Norman, The Silver Wreath (London, 1879), p. 78Google Scholar; Moodie, D., Moodie’s Zulu War (1879; reprint Cape Town, 1988), p. 77Google Scholar.
21 The Standard, 2 May, 1879.
22 French, Gerald, Lord Chelmsford and the Zulu War (London, 1939), p. 111Google Scholar.
23 Holme, , Silver Wreath, p. 49Google Scholar.
24 Ibid.
25 Ibid., p. 63
26 Ian, Lieut-Colonel Bennett, H. W., Eyewitness in Zululand: The Campaign Reminiscences of Colonel W.A. Dunne, CB: South Africa, 1877-1881 (London, 1989), p. 178Google Scholar.
27 Emery, Frank, The Red Soldier: Letters from the Zulu War, 1879, (Johannesburg, 1979), p. 241Google Scholar.
28 Clarke, , Zululand at War, p. 131Google Scholar.
29 Preston, , Garnet Wolseley, p. 57Google Scholar.
30 Bennett, Ian H., Eyewitness in Zululand, p. 173Google Scholar.
31 PRO, WO 32/7737.
32 Preston, , Garnet Wolseley, p. 257Google Scholar.
33 Holme, , Silver Wreath, p.64Google Scholar.
34 Clarke, , Zululand at War, p. 131Google Scholar.
35 File of “The Letters of Lt. General Lord Chelmsford, Colonel Glyn and General Sir George Cunynghame,” South Wales Borderers’ Museum, Accession no 13.83.
36 SirCoupland, Reginald, Zulu Battle Piece: Isandhlwana (1948; reprint London, 1991), p. 104Google Scholar.
37 Brookes, Edgar H. and Webb, Colin de B., A History of Natal (Pietermaritzburg, 1965), pp. 141–42Google Scholar.
38 38Archibald Forbes, “Lord Chelmsford and the Zule War,” The Nineteenth Century 7 (Feb. 1880): 216-34.
39 Forbes, Archibald, Barracks, Bivouacks and Battles (London, 1920), p. 135Google Scholar.
40 Ashe, Major and Wyatt-Edgell, Captain E.V., The Story of the Zulu Campaign (1880; reprint Cape Town, 1989), pp. 396–401Google Scholar.
41 Ibid., pp. 169, 340.
42 Ibid., p. 262.
43 Forbes, , Barracks, p. 138Google Scholar.
44 Quoted in Brigadier-General Melvill, C. W., The Life of General Sir Reavers Buller (London, 1925), p. 103Google Scholar.
45 SirBengough, H. M., Memories of a Soldier’s Life (London, 1913), p. 133Google Scholar.
46 Forbes, , Barracks, p. 137Google Scholar.
47 Ibid., p. 138.
48 Ashe, , Zulu Campaign, p. 245Google Scholar.
49 Ibid., p. 130.
50 Emery, , The Red Soldier, p. 177Google Scholar.
51 Ashe, , The Zulu Campaign, pp. 338–41Google Scholar.
52 Forbes, , Barracks, p. 144Google Scholar.
53 The Graphic, 15 Mar. 1879.
54 The war still generates a flood of popular histories that continue to mythologize the heroism of both armies with variation on the incompetence of the commanders and the suffering of war. The most perceptively scathing comments on these popularizations of the war are to be found in Guy, Jeff, The Destruction of the Zulu Kingdom (London, 1979)Google Scholar, although the book is concerned with the Zulu civil war that followed the defeat by the British rather than the war of 1879 itself. While Morris’s, Donald R. The Washing of the Spears (London, 1966)Google Scholar fed the flood it rose above these generally feeble productions through the thoroughness of his research, the balanced treatment of the combatants and the quality of his narrative. Among academic historians there is a shin from military history, narrowly conceived, toward placing the war in the context of social and political change in southern Africa ( Laband, J., Kingdom in Crisis: The Zulu response to the British Invasion of 1879 [Manchester, 1992])Google Scholar. The historiography of the war deserves separate treatment on account of the light it throws on attitudes to empire, the construction of Britishness, and the different modes of historical writing in textbooks, popular histories, and scholarly works.
- 3
- Cited by