Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:58:11.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

England Is The Country: Modernization and the National Self-image

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Martin J. Wiener
Get access

Extract

In the last hundred years the British initiators of the Industrial Revolution have fallen behind one after another of their imitators. As a consequence, the issue of “modernization” has moved to the head of the political agenda in a nation that was for the nineteenth century world the very model of “modernity.” Much of this change in world position was inevitable — yet not all of it. Why, historians have recently been asking, did Britain between 1870 and 1900 lose the economic dynamism that had been her hallmark? Why, further, did the British fail to recover this lost dynamism in the twentieth century?

The British experience ought to be of particular interest to Americans today, for recently we have become aware of the costs as well as the benefits of economic growth. Our faith in material progress is dimming. At the same time, our former economic dynamism seems now in question. Indeed, we may be repeating the experience of Britain.

To understand the change in British economic behavior, we must look at more than solely economic history. As Max Weber argued as far back as 1904, economic activity takes place in a wider social context. Attitudes and values play a vital role in shaping economic behavior. Development economists have discovered in the last two decades that economic change is not produced solely by economic means — by introducing technology and capital alone. To some degree at least, societies “choose” their economic futures by the values they hold. Because of this, intellectual and social history may tell us much about the difficulties of continuing modernization in twentieth century Britain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , Winter 1971 , pp. 198 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 See Stearns, Peter, “Britain and the Spread of the Industrial Revolution”, in Bartlett, C. J., ed., Britain Pre-eminent (London, 1969).Google Scholar

2 Recent historians of the British economy have given an increasingly important place to the social context. See, for example, Landes, David, The Unbound Prometheus (Cambridge, 1969)Google Scholar, Hobsbawm, E. J., Industry and Empire (London, 1968)Google Scholar, Flinn, M. W., Origins of the Industrial Revolution (London, 1966)Google Scholar and Levine, A. L., Industrial Retardation in Britain 1880-1914 (New York, 1967)Google Scholar. In a recently taped discussion, R. M. Hartwell and Peter Matthias, perhaps the two foremost British authorities on the Industrial Revolution, agreed that purely economic explanations for it were quite inadequate, and that economic historians ought to seek more aid from sociology. Sussex Tapes (Brighton, 1970).Google ScholarPubMed

3 National self-images have been valuably studied by American cultural historians and by political scientists interested in the developing nations. British history could benefit from contact with this literature. In American history, see the seminal work by Smith, Henry Nash, Virgin Land (Cambridge, Mass., 1950)Google Scholar, and particularly relevant to the theme of this paper, Hartshorne, T. L., The Distorted Image (Cleveland, Ohio, 1968)Google Scholar. The impact of industrialism upon the national self-image of American writers has been brilliantly analyzed in Marx, Leo, The Machine in the Garden (New York, 1964)Google Scholar. In political science, see Pye, Lucian, Politics, Personality and Nation-Building: Burma's Search for Identity (New Haven, Conn., 1962)Google Scholar, and Gordon, David C., Self-Determination and History in the Third World (Princeton, N. J., 1971).Google Scholar

4 See, for example, Hobsbawm's, E. J. observation, in Industry and Empire, 142Google Scholar. See also Chappie, J. A. V., Documentary and Imaginative Literature 1880-1920 (London, 1970), Chapter 3.Google Scholar

5 Keith, W. J., Richard Jefferies (Toronto, 1965), 54.Google Scholar

6 “Country Books,” Cornhill, XXXXII (1880), 662.Google Scholar

7 Peter J. Schmitt has described a simliar development among the American urban middle class between 1900 and 1920. See Back to Nature: The Arcadian Myth in Urban America (New York, 1969).Google Scholar

8 Indeed, H. J. Dyos has observed, “the suggestion that some kind of retreat from the city was necessary — into the suburbs, the country, or abroad — was never made more often.” “The Slums of Victorian London.” Victorian Studies, XI, (September 1967), 22.Google Scholar

9 Social Arrows (London, 1887), 51–2.Google ScholarPubMed

10 See Winsten, Stephen, Salt and his Circle (London, 1951)Google Scholar, and Carpenter, Edward, My Days and Dreams (London, 1916)Google Scholar. An interesting study of the use of the idea of “nature” in the revolt against Victorianism is Alcorn, John M., “Hardy to Lawrence: A Study in Naturism,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, 1966.Google Scholar

11 See Demos (London, 1886), ch. 36Google ScholarPubMed; The Nether World (London, 1889; New York, 1929), 10Google ScholarPubMed; In the Year of Jubilee (London, 1894; New York, 1895), 72-3, 98-9, 196–97.Google Scholar

12 See, for example, the varied activities of the Rev. Sabine Baring-Gould, who between 1889 and 1906 published many volumes of West Country folksongs and several works on “old country life” (the title of one of these) and customs. Another prolific recorder of traditional rural life was Walter Raymond: see his English Country Life (London, 1910)Google ScholarPubMed, and other similar volumes.

13 See Keith, W. J., “Thomas Hardy and the Literary Pilgrims,” Nineteenth Century Fiction, XXIV, no. 1 (June 1969), 80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also, see Blunden, Edmund, Thomas Hardy (London, 1941), 61.Google Scholar

14 Jefferies', fullest portrait of English rural society, Hodge and His Masters (London, 1880)Google Scholar, was originally entitled “The Heart of England.” In his plan for his work he stressed the rural foundations of England. See Looker, Samuel & Porteous, Crichton, Richard Jefferies: Man of the Fields (London, 1965), 235Google Scholar. One of Jefferies' chief concerns was the English character, particularly in its relation to country life. See Looker & Porteous, 133, and his essays in Looker, S. J., ed., The Old House at Coate (Cambridge, Mass., 1948).Google Scholar

15 See Hodge and His Masters, 132-34, 318; Round About a Great Estate (London, 1880)Google Scholar; “The Wiltshire Labourer,” (1883), in The Hills and the Vale (London, 1909)Google ScholarPubMed; The Dewy Morn (London, 1884).Google Scholar

16 See Morris, May, ed., William Morris: Artist, Writer, Socialist (Oxford, 1936), I, 140-41, 255Google Scholar; Mackail, J. W., Life of William Morris (London, 1899; New York, 1901), 302–3Google Scholar; and Morris', Dream of John Ball (London, 1887).Google Scholar

17 “The Lesser Arts” (1877), Works, XXII, 17.Google Scholar

18 Oldershaw, Lucien, ed., England: A Nation (London, 1904), 99.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., 49.

20 By George Bartram.

21 The English Countryside (London, 1915), 2–3Google Scholar. See also Thomas, Edward, The Heart of England (London, 1906)Google ScholarPubMed and ed., This England (London, 1915?Google ScholarPubMed), and Hutton, Edward, England of My Heart (London, 1914)Google Scholar, among others.

22 See Haddow, Elizabeth, “The Novel of English Country Life 1900-30,” M. A. Thesis, King's College, London, 1957.Google Scholar

23 Ibid., 325.

24 (London, 1903; New York, n.d.), 214-15.

25 Ibid., 217-18.

26 (London, 1910; New York, 1954), 15.

27 This view of London is given in ibid., 108, 261, and elsewhere through the novel.

28 “Reflections on Contemporary Poetry,” The Egoht, IV, 8 (Sept. 1917), 118.Google Scholar

29 The difficulties of defining the term “Georgian” are discussed in John Press, A Map of Modern English Verse (London, 1969), ch. 7Google Scholar. The Georgians have recently been defended against the charge of vapid “pseudo-pastorailism” by Robert H. Ross, who finds the culprits to be “Neo-Georgian” latecomers. See The Georgian Revolt: Rise and Fall of a Poetic Ideal (Carbondale, Ill., 1965).Google Scholar

30 “England,” in Georgian Poetry 1918-1919 (London, 1919), ed. Marsh, Edward, 35.Google Scholar

31 “Makeshift” (1894), in Morris, May ed., William Morris: Artist, Writer, Socialist, II, 476Google Scholar, and “Art and the People,” (1883) also in May Morris, II, 401.

32 Bryce, James, Impressions of South Africa (London, 1897), 571.Google Scholar

33 See Masterman, C. F. G., essay in Oldershaw, , ed., England: A Nation, In Peril of Change (n.d., London, 1905?)Google Scholar, and The Condition of England (London, 1908)Google ScholarPubMed; Chesterton, G. K., What's Wrong with the World (New York, 1910)Google Scholar; Belloc, Hilaire, The Servile State (London, 1912).Google Scholar

34 Hobson saw himself as a follower of John Ruskin and his repudiation of Victorian materialism. See Hobson's, John Ruskin, Social Reformer (London, 1898)Google Scholar and Porter, Bernard, Critics of Empire (London, 1968), 171–172.Google Scholar

35 In Montague Fordham, , Mother Earth (London, 1908), 5.Google Scholar

36 Outspoken Essays (London, 1919), 101, 103.Google Scholar

37 “Brougham Villiers” [Shaw, Frederick J.], England and the New Era (London, 1920), 231–232.Google Scholar

38 Whither England? The Letters of a Conservative (London, 1932), 140Google Scholar. The book has an admiring preface by Walter Elliott, who had just become Minister of Agriculture. See also the similar views of Philip Gibbs (later to be knighted), The Way of Escape (London, 1933).Google ScholarPubMed

39 Ibid., 211-212.

40 Interest in the English character was evidenced by a series of 23 B.B.C. talks on “The National Character”, published in The Listener, 4 Oct. 1933-4 April 1934. See also “As Others See Us,” Contemporary Review, CXLIII (1933), 85–93Google Scholar, discussing a group of seven books on England by foreigners. See also, among others, Hartley, Dorothy, Here's England (London, 1934)Google Scholar, Cowles, Frederick I., Not Far From the Smoke (London, 1935)Google Scholar, Gibbs, Philip, England Speaks (London, 1935)Google Scholar, Blunden, Edmundet. al., The Legacy of England (London, 1935)Google Scholar, and the best-known product of this mood of introspection, Priestley's, J. B.English Journey (London, 1934).Google Scholar

41 From Surtees to Sassoon (London, 1931), 209.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., 210-213.

43 “England” (1924), in On England (London, 1926), 6.Google ScholarPubMed

44 Middlemas, Keith and Barnes, John. Baldwin (London, 1969), 2.Google Scholar

45 See ibid., 1-3.

46 For his attitude towards his family firm, see Middlemas and Barnes, chs. 1 and 2; his distaste for “mechanization” can be seen in his speech, “On the Strain of Modern Industry,” (1937), in Service of Our Lives (London, 1937), 106-117, especially pp. 108 and 116Google Scholar. Baldwin's distaste was shared by others high in his Governments. One of his closest friends, Edward Wood, Lord Halifax, agreed that the national character, grown out of country life, was gravely threatened by “the mechanical civilization of today” with its “vast aggregations of the population in industrial cities.” Foreword to Rogerson, Sidney, The Old Enchantment (London, 1938).Google Scholar

47 See Flee to the Fields (London, 1934)Google Scholar, a symposium of the movement's leading writers.

48 Forgotten England (London, 1931), 215.Google ScholarPubMed

49 See Middlemas, and Barnes, , Baldwin, 2, 35.Google Scholar

50 Young, G. M., Baldwin (London, 1952), 25.Google Scholar

51 Middlemas, and Barnes, , Baldwin, 2, 35.Google Scholar

52 For evidence of his public image as the quintessence of “Englishness,” see Middlemas, and Barnes, , Baldwin, 170-171, 211, 506.Google Scholar

53 Young, G. M., Baldwin, 56.Google Scholar

54 Middlemas, and Barnes, , Baldwin, 171.Google Scholar

55 “Our National Character,” in This Torch of Freedom (London, 1935), 14.Google Scholar

56 Ibid., 11-12.

57 “The Love of Country Things” (1931), ibid., 120.

58 “England”, in On England, 7.

59 “The Wealth and the Glory of England” (1928), ibid., 116.

60 Middlemas, and Barnes, , Baldwin, 1078.Google Scholar

61 Ibid., 1078.

62 “The Glory of the Garden,” in Fletcher, C. R. L. and Kipling, Rudyard, A History of England (London, 1911), 249.Google Scholar