No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Daniel O'Connell and the Leadership Crisis within the Irish Repeal Party, 1843-1845
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2014
Extract
The main source of the criticism of the political leadership of Daniel O'Connell during the last three years of his life emanated from inside his own Irish Repeal Party. These attacks crystallized around the conflict that arose between the moral force tactics of O'Connell and the more militant and republican and separatist critics of these policies. The indictment of these critics, who became known as the Young Ireland group, has not been seriously challenged by Irish national historians since. Oliver MacDonagh admitted that before 1843 O'Connell had “blazed the trail at Westminster” and had begun the political enlightenment of the masses, involving the Church in his movement. Yet “in the end he failed ingloriously. After 1843 his creation began to disintegrate until two decades later his purposes and techniques seemed almost to have vanished.”
O'Connell's flexible and pragmatic genius during his prime has remained unquestioned. Then he forged, out of the defeat and division of the Act of Union, a political link between the Irish Catholic Lower Nation and the English Protestant Upper Nation, and thereby created the first Irish parliamentary party that could speak with a national voice. What, then, was the basis of these imputations against his last three years? An answer to this question may be provided through a study of O'Connell's particular application of his moral force tactics during his last three years. Two major events will be selected to pinpoint these policies of O'Connell and the conflict within Repeal that ensued. The first occurred in 1843 at Clontarf where O'Connell made a firm declaration on the physical limitations of his objectives. For this he has been reproached for his insincerity and timidity when threatened by the British government. The second occurred in the debate over the College Bill in 1845 in the Repeal Association. There the ideological emphasis of his moral force tactics, namely, his Catholic alliance, was criticized as too divisive and outdated for the Irish national movement. Thus, to O'Connell was attributed both the failure to show bold leadership in a moment of national peril, and an unrealistic and autocratic inability to overcome the sectarian and religious division within Repeal.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1970
References
NOTES
1 MacDonagh, Oliver, Ireland (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1968), 48.Google Scholar
2 Tait's Edinburgh Magazine, XII (May 1845), 405Google Scholar. Defined the “Irish Lower Nation” as the Irish people of the predominantly Catholic rural subsistence economy society. The “Irish Upper Nation” was the Protestant landlord class in Ireland. Senior, Nassau, Journals, Conversations and Essays Relating to Ireland. (2 vols.; London, 1868), I, 23 ffGoogle Scholar. He identified the “Lower Nation” as including not only Connaught, but some counties in Leinster, as well as Donegal in Ulster.
3 Roche, Kennedy F., “Revolution and Counter-Revolution,” in Tierney, Michael, ed., Daniel O'Connell: Nine Centenary Essays (Dublin, 1948), 112.Google Scholar
4 Denis R. Gwynn, “Young Ireland,” in Tierney. ed., op. cit., 171-205.
5 Duffy, Charles Gavan. Young Ireland; A Fragment of Irish History, 1840-1850 (London, 1880), 370.Google Scholar
6 Loc. cit.
7 Shaw's Authenticated Report of the Irish State Trials, 1844 (Dublin, 1844), 512.Google Scholar
8 Roche, in Tierney, op. cit., 79. Lecky, William E. H., A History of Ireland in the Eighteenth Century (5 vols.; London, 1909), V, 470–73Google Scholar. D. O'Connell to William S. O'Brien, M.P., Dec. 17, 1846, in Fitzpatrick, William J., ed., Correspondence of Daniel O'Connell, the Liberator (2 vols.; London, 1888), II, 397.Google Scholar
9 Duffy, Young Ireland, 381.
10 Fitzpatrick, , ed., Correspondence of O'Connell, II, 333.Google Scholar
11 Cusack, M. F., Speeches and Public Letters of the Liberator. (2 vols.; Dublin, 1875), II, 169Google Scholar. Thorn's Irish Almanac and Official Director … for the Year 1849. (Dublin, 1849)Google Scholar, “Statistics on Crime in Ireland,” 1379.
12 Sir James Graham to Lord Stanley, Oct. 4, 1843, private, in Parker, Charles Stuart, ed., The Life and Letters of Sir James Graham. (2 vols.; London, 1907). II, 398 ffGoogle Scholar. The Times (London), October 17, 1843.Google Scholar
13 Thorn's Irish Almanac, 54.
14 Duke of Wellington to Sir James Graham, Oct. 5, 1843, in Parker, , ed., Graham, II, 410–12.Google Scholar
15 Britain, Great, Parliament, Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, Third Series, Vol. 72 (Feb. 23, 1844), 243–47Google Scholar. Parker, Charles Stuart, ed., Sir Robert Peel from His Private Correspondence and Papers, 2d ed., (3 vols., London, 1889), III, 106Google Scholar. Cabinet Memorandum, February 17, 1844.
16 Duffy, , Young Ireland, 370.Google Scholar
17 Bartlett, Chrisotpher John, Great Britain and Sea Power, 1815-1853 (Oxford, 1963), 170, 173.Google Scholar
18 Duffy, op. cit., 322 ff.
19 Spectator, May 3, 1845.
20 Gwynn, Denis R., Thomas Francis Meagher (O'Donnell Lecture, Dublin, National University of Ireland, 1961), 8–14.Google Scholar
21 McDowell, Robert Brendan, Public Opinion and Government Policy in Ireland, 1801-1846 (London, 1952), 236 ff.Google Scholar
22 Scheme of Federal Parliament,” Oct. 12, 1844, in Fitzpatrick, , ed., Correspondence of O'Connell, II, 433–47.Google Scholar
23 Cabinet Memorandum, Feb. 17, 1844, Parker, ed., Peel, III, 106Google Scholar. Hansard. 3rd Series, 72 (Feb. 23, 1844), 243–47.Google Scholar
24 Duffy, , Young Ireland, 698–708.Google Scholar
25 Levy, John, ed., A Full and Revised Report on the Three Days' Discussion in the Corporation of Dublin on the Repeal of the Union (Dublin, 1843), 55.Google Scholar
26 “Politics of the Month — Academical Colleges,” Tait's XII (May 1845), 542Google Scholar. Moody, Theodore William, “The Irish University Question of the Nineteenth Century,” History, XLIII (1958), 97–100.Google Scholar
27 Levy, , ed., Discussion on Repeal, 20.Google Scholar
28 Cusack, , Speeches and Public Letters, II, 130–37.Google Scholar
29 Macintyre, Angus D., The Liberator; Daniel O'Connell and the Irish Party, 1830-1847 (London, 1965), 284.Google Scholar
30 “Our Portait Gallery — Thomas Davis,” Dublin University Magazine, XXIX (Feb., 1847), 190 ff.Google Scholar This conservative magazine referred to the Young Ireland Protestant, Thomas Davis, as “a gentleman and an Irish patriot, unlike Daniel O'Connell.”
31 The Times, Aug. 13, 1845.
32 O'Reilly, Bernard, John MacHale, Archibishop of Tuam; His Life, Times and Correspondence (2 vols.; New York, 1890), I, 622.Google Scholar
33 Tait's XII (June 1845). 743 ff.Google Scholar
34 Dr. Cullen to Dr. MacHale, Jan. 4, 1844, O'Reilly, op. cit., 547.
35 The Pilot (Dublin), Dec. 9, 1844.Google Scholar
36 O'Reilly, , John MacHale, I, 554 ff and 580Google Scholar. Spectator, Dec. 14, 1844, and Dec. 28, 1844.
37 Spectator, Mar. 8, 1845.
38 Quarterly Review, LXXIV (1844), 165.Google Scholar
39 Broderick, John F., Holy See and the Irish Movement for the Repeal of the Union with England, 1829-1847 (Rome, 1951), 151 ffGoogle Scholar. This book explains the to main schools of thought on Repeal among the Irish clergy. The “government” party did not openly support Repeal, as they were sceptical of its success, or fearful of its radicalism. O'Reilly, op. cit., I, 557-559. Cullen expressed his hostility to the Charitable Bequest Board, and to having an English ambassador at Rome.
40 Hoffman, Ross, “Whigs and Liberal Pope,” Thought, XIV (Mar. 1949), 83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Broderick, , Holy See, 164Google Scholar. Pope Gregory XVI had learned ot fear revolution. Austrian troops had been used by him to repress armed revolts in the Papal States.
41 Broderick, , Holy See, 165.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., 166.
43 Peel to Graham, Nov. 27, 1843, and Graham to Peel, Nov. 29, 1843, in Parker, , ed., Graham, I, 402.Google Scholar
44 Report made by the Rev. Tobias Kirby of conversations with Pope Gregory XVI. Broderick, , Holy See, 167.Google Scholar
45 Spectator, Jan. 25, 1845, 78Google Scholar. The Times Jan. 13, 1845. Cullen to MacHale, Jan. 4, 1844, O'Reilly, , John MacHale, I, 547.Google Scholar
46 Broderick, , Holy See, 184–91.Google Scholar
47 Ibid., 151 ff. Macintyre, , The Liberator, 83–85.Google Scholar
48 Duffy, , Young Ireland, 624.Google Scholar
49 Broderick, , Holy See, 196Google Scholar. He cites the Weekly Freeman's Journal (Dublin), Jan. 18, 1845Google Scholar. The Times, Jan. 16, 1845.
50 Spectator, May 3, 1845.Google Scholar
51 Roche, , in Tierney, , ed., Nine Essays, 112.Google Scholar