Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:27:07.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Britain's Foreign Alliances in the Eighteenth Century*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Jeremy Black
Get access

Extract

One of the greatest problems in the discussion of eighteenth-century British foreign policy concerns the assessment of the influence of the particular character of the British political system. British foreign policy, and thus the country's alliance strategy, was conditioned by the subtle interplay of internal processes, the functioning of her domestic political system, and the international situation. As historians are concerned increasingly to probe the nature of the domestic pressures influencing the formulation and execution of policy, so it becomes more important to define the political, as opposed to constitutional, role of Parliament and public opinion. This is of obvious significance for the study of Britain's relations with her allies. Were these made more difficult as a consequence of the distinctive character of the British political system? There was no shortage of contemporaries willing to state that this was the case. An obvious category of discussion concerned the citing of domestic pressure as a reason why concessions could not be made to foreign powers, both allies and those whose alliance was sought. This was of particular significance when ministries explained why gains made during war could not be surrendered at peace treaties and gains made at the peace could not be yielded subsequently. Their defense of the retention of Gibraltar was based on this argument. Similar arguments were used by British ministers in seeking to persuade allies to do as they wished. Diplomatic pressure on France over the state of Dunkirk or on Spain and Portugal over commercial disputes made frequent use of the argument of domestic pressure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , Winter 1988 , pp. 573 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article is based on a paper given at the Anglo-American Conference, 2 July 1987. I am grateful to those present for their helpful comments and to the Staff Travel and Research Fund of Durham University, the British Academy, and the Twenty-Seven Foundation for supporting my research. I would like to thank an anonymous reader for comments on an earlier draft. Unless otherwise indicated dates are in new style.

References

1 Turner, E. R., “Parliament and Foreign Affairs, 1630–1760,” English Historical Review 34 (1919)Google Scholar; Thomson, M. A., “Parliament and Foreign Policy, 1689–1714,” History, n.s. 38 (1953): 234–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gibbs, G. C., “Parliament and Foreign Policy in the Age of Stanhope and Walpole,” English Historical Review 77 (1962): 18–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gibbs, , “Parliament and the Treaty of Quadruple Alliance,” in Hatton, R. M. and Bromley, J. S., eds., William III and Louis XIV. Essays 1680–1720 By and For Mark A. Thompson (Liverpool, 1968), pp. 287–305Google Scholar; Gibbs, , “Newspapers, Parliament and Foreign Policy in the Age of Stanhope and Walpole,” in Mélanges Offerts à G. Jacquemyns (Brussels, 1968), pp. 293–315Google Scholar; Wollman, D. H., “Parliament and Foreign Affairs, 1697–1714,” (Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 1970)Google Scholar; Black, J. M., “Parliament and the Political and Diplomatic Crisis of 1717–1718,” Parliamentary History 3 (1984): 77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Black, , “The House of Lords and British Foreign Policy 1720–1748,” in Jones, C., ed., A Pillar of the Constitution: The House of Lords in British Politics, 1603–1784 (London, 1989)Google Scholar.

2 Public Record Office, SP 107/IB fos. 305, 372, Gyllenborg, Swedish envoy in London, to Görtz, Swedish minister, 18 Dec. 1716, Görtz to Gyllenborg, 16 Jan. 1717; Darmstadt, Staatsarchiv, Graflich Görtzisches Archiv F23, 153/6 fo. 35, Schulenburg, Hanoverian courtier in London, to Görtz, Hanoverian minister, 23 Apr. 1717; Cambridge, University Library, Cholmondely Houghton papers, correspondence 1290, Sinzendorf, Chancellor of Austria, to Palm, Austrian envoy in London, 23 Mar. 1726; Bodleian Library, Ms. Rawlinson 135 fo. 401, Zamboni, Hesse-Darmstadt agent in London, to Landgrave of Hesse-Darmstadt, 22 Jan. 1732; Paris, Archives du Ministère des Relations Extérieures, Correspondance Politique Angleterre, 416 fo. 127, Amelot, French foreign minister, to Bussy, French envoy in London; Hattendorf, J. B., England in the War of the Spanish Succession (New York, 1987). p. 250Google Scholar.

3 Black, J. M. and Reese, A.. “Die Panik von 1731,” in Expansion und Gteichgewicht. Studien zur europaischen Mächtepotitik des ancien régime, ed. Kunisch, J. (Berlin, 1986), pp. 69–95Google Scholar; Black, , “British Intelligence and the Mid-Eighteenth Century Crisis,” Intelligence and National Security 2 (1987): 217–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Black, , “Jacobitism and British Foreign Policy, 1731–35,” in The Jacobite Challenge, ed. Black, and Cruickshanks, E. (Edinburgh, 1988), pp. 142–44Google Scholar.

4 Langford, P., The Eighteenth Century (London, 1976), pp. 102–03Google Scholar.

5 AE.CP. Ang. 380 fo. 62, 387 fo. 6, Chavigny to Chetardie, envoy in Berlin, 14 Apr. 1733, Chavigny to Chauvelin, French foreign minister, 4 July 1734.

6 Woodfine, P., “The Anglo-Spanish War of 1739,” in The Origins of War in Early Modern Europe, ed. Black, J. (Edinburgh, 1987), pp. 185–92Google Scholar.

7 AE.CP. Palatinat 78 fo. 9, memorandum by Saint Contest, given to Grevenbroch, Palatine envoy in Paris, 9 Jan. 1753.

8 British Library, Additional MS. 37368, fo. 333, Cadogan and Whitworth to Craggs, 5 July 1718; Paris, Archives Nationales, Archives de la Marine, B7 279, report from L'Inventaire, 4 Apr. 1720; Vienna, Hausz-, Hof-, und Staatsarchiv, Nachlass Fonseca 21 fo. 341, Pentenriedter to Defonseca, Austrian envoy in Paris, 22 Mar. 1727; Münster, Staatsarchiv, Archiv. Nordkirchen, Nachtrag B 104 fo. 49, Chavigny to [Friedrich Christian von Plettenberg?[, 16 Apr. 1733; AE.CP. Ang. 380 fo. 194, Chavigny to Chauvelin, 22 May 1733; HHStA, Grosse Korrespondenz 94(b) fo. 234, Kinsky to Eugene, 16 Feb. 1734; BL, Add. MS. 23796 fos 1–2, Walpole to Robinson, 1 Jan. 1735; AE.CP. Prusse 171 fos. 260–61, 310, Saint-Contest to La Touche, envoy in Berlin, 22 May, 22 June 1753; AE.CP. Espagne 533 fos. 431–32, Ossun, envoy in Madrid, to Choiseul, French foreign minister, 17 Sept. 1761.

9 P. R. O., SP 88/72, Newcastle to Hanbury-Williams, envoy to Augustus III of Saxony-Poland, 8 Feb. 1751 (os); BL, Add. MS. 35468, fo. 60, Dickens to Keith, 18 Feb. 1750 (os); Turin, Archivio di Stato, Lettere Ministri lnghilterra 57, Perrone, Sardinian envoy in London, to Charles Emmanuel III, 2 Mar. 1752.

10 Roberts, M., Splendid Isolation, 1763–80 (Reading, 1970)Google Scholar.

11 Lodge, R., “The Anglo-French Alliance, 1716–1731,” in Studies in Anglo-French History during the Eighteenth, Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, eds. Coville, A. and Temperley, H. (Cambridge, 1935), pp. 3–18Google Scholar; Black, , “The Anglo-French Alliance 1716–1731,” Francia 13 (1986): 303–10Google Scholar; Black, , The Collapse of the Anglo-French Alliance 1727–1731 (Gloucester, 1987)Google Scholar. On French problems with their allies see Black, J., “French Foreign Policy in the Age of Fleury Reassessed,” English Historical Review 103 (1988): 373–83Google Scholar.

12 Black, J., “1733-Failure of British Diplomacy?” Durham University Journal 74 (1982): 199–209Google Scholar; “British Neutrality in the War of the Polish Succession, 1733–1735,” International History Review 8 (1986): 345–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Doran, P. F., Andrew Mitchell and Anglo-Prussian Diplomatic Relations during the Seven Years War (1986), pp. 382–83Google Scholar: Schweizer, K. W., “Frederick the Great, William Pitt and Lord Bute: The Origin, Development and Dissolution of the Anglo-Prussian Alliance, 1756–63” (Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge, 1976)Google Scholar, Schweizer, , “The Non-renewal of the Anglo-Prussian Subsidy Treaty, 1761–1762: A Historical Revision,” Canadian Journal of History 13 (1978): 383–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schweizer, and Leonard, C. S., “Britain, Prussia, Russia and the Galitzin Letter: A Reasessment,” Historical Journal 26 (1983): 531–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Black, J., Natural and Necessary Enemies. Anglo-French Relations in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1985), pp. 77–78Google Scholar.

15 Cambridge University Library, Add. MS. 6958, No.891, Auckland to Pitt the younger; Bodleian, Bland Burges papers 30, fos. 93, 124, 129, 132, 136, Auckland to Burges, Under Secretary at the Foreign Office, 10 Jan., 13 Feb., 1, 5, 19 March 1791.

16 Edinburgh, Scottish Record Office, GD. 135/141/11, Robethon, advisor of George I, to Stair, 12 July 1717.

17 AE.CP. Espagne 470 fo. 15, Hollande 443 fos. 68, 261, Amelot to the Bishop of Rennes, envoy in Spain, 16 Jan. 1742, Amelot to Fénelon, 25 June, Fénelon to Amelot, 18 July 1742.

18 Munich, Bayerisches Hauptstaatsarchiv, Bayerisches Gesandstchaft, Dresden 821, Charles VII to Baron de Wetzel, Bavarian envoy in Dresden, 29 June 1742.

19 AE. Mémoires et Documents Aug. 40 fo. 103; Flammermont, J.F., Les Correspondances des Agents Diplomatiques Étrangeres en France avant la Revolution (Paris, 1896), pp. 66–67Google Scholar.

20 Le Secret du Roi. Correspondance secrète de Louis XV avec ses agents diplomatiques, 1752–1774, ed. de Broglie, Due, 2 vols. (Paris, 1878), 2:415Google Scholar.

21 Roider, K.A., Austria's Eastern Question 1700–1790 (Princeton, 1982)Google Scholar.

22 Black, J., “British Foreign Policy in the Eighteenth Century: A Survey,” Journal of British Studies 26 (1987): 39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Black, , “Sir Robert Ainslie: His Majesty's Agent-provocateur: British Foreign Policy and the International Crisis of 1787, “ European History Quarterly 14 (1984): 270–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marcum, J. W., “Vorontsov and Pitt: The Russian Assessment of a British Statesman, 1785–1792,“ Rocky Mountain Social Science Journal 10 (1973): 49–51Google Scholar. Fbr the position in the 1690s see Davies, G., “The Control of British foreign policy by William III,“ in Essays on the later Stuarts (London, 1958), pp. 91–122Google Scholar; Oakley, S., William III and the Northern Crowns During the Nine Years War, 1689–1697 (New York, 1987), p. 15Google Scholar.

23 Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire Record Office, Trevor papers, 27, Horatio Walpole to Trevor, 10 June 1741 (os).

24 Chewton Mendip, Chewton Hall, papers of James first Earl Waldegrave, envoy in Paris, Newcastle to Waldegrave, 27 Feb., 11, 18 Apr. 1740 (os), Hull, University Library, Hotham papers, DDHO 3/3, Reichenbach-Grumbkow correspondence; PRO. SP 78/287 fo.191, Stormont to Rochford, 7 Apr. 1773.

25 PRO., SP 43/93, Harringto n to Newcastle, 25 Sept. 1740; Luff, P., “Henry Fox and the ‘Lead’ in the House of Commons 1754–1755,“ Parliamentary History 6 (1987): 34Google Scholar.

26 Dann, U., Hannover und England, 1740–1760: Diplomatie und Selbsterhaltung (Hildesheim, 1986)Google Scholar.

27 Roberts, H.,“Great Britain and the Swedish Revolution, 1772–73,“ Historical Journal 7 (1964): 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roberts, , British Diplomacy and Swedish Politics, 1758–1773 (London, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Iden Green, Mill St. House, papers of Edward Weston, Chavigny to Schulin, 1 March 1739; BL, Add. MS. 32801, fo. 59, Waldegrave to Keene, 22 June 1739; AE.CP. Ang. 42 8 fo. 77, Mirepoix to Puysieulx, French foreign minister, 30 Jan. 1750.

29 BL, Add. MS 23822, fo. 245, 35363, fo. 119, Trevor to Robinson, 26 March 1746, Philip Yorke, ministerial M.P., to his brother Joseph, aide-de-camp to the Duke of Cumberland, 17 Apr. 1746 (os).

30 Symcox, G.,“ Britain and Victor Amadeus II: or, the Use and Abuse of Allies,” in England's Rise to Greatness, 1660–1763, ed. Baxter, S. (Berkeley, 1983), p. 165Google Scholar; Eldon, C. W., England's Subsidy Policy Towards the Continent during the Seven Years' War (Philadelphia, 1938), app. IIGoogle Scholar; Dickson, P. G. M., Finance and Government under Maria Theresa 1740–1780, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1987), 2:145–67Google Scholar.

31 Munich, Kasten Schwarz 17211, Haslang to Charles VII, 12 May 1741; BL, Althorp papers M15(4), Marlborough to grandson John Spencer, 20 Jan. 1742 (os); P.R.O. SP. 107/53, Amelot to Bussy, 3 March 1742; AE.CP.Ang. 414 fo. 275, Espagne 470 fo. 213, Bussy to Amelot, 29 March, Amelot to Rennes, 6 Apr. 1742.

32 BL, Add. MS 23823, fo. 101, 23826, fo. 290, Pelham to Robinson, 18 July 1747 (os), Hanbury-Williams to Robinson, 22 Dec. 1747.

33 BL, Add. MS. 35411, fo. 189, Newcastle to Pelham, 25 Oct. 1750 (os).

34 BL, Add. MS. 35423, fos. 103, 109–10, Pelham to Lord Chancellor Hardwicke, 19 Aug., 6 Oct. 1750 (os).

35 AE.CP. Ang. 429 fo. 72, D'Artagnan memorandum, 7 Aug. 1750; BL, Add. MS. 51393, fo. 85, Hanbury-Williams to Lord Holland, 23 March 1752.

36 AE.CP. Ang. 191, Tallard to Louis XIV, 3, 7, 21 March, 2 Apr. 1701.

37 BL, Add. MS. 32941, fo. 87, Hardwicke account of conference, 28 July 1762.

38 BL, Add. MS. 35410, fo. 227, Hardwicke to Newcastle, 1 June 1750 (os).

39 Munich, Bayr. Ges. London 234–35, Haslang to Bavarian foreign minister Count Preysing, 2, 16 Jan. 1759.

40 Panorama der Friedericianischen Zeit, ed. Ziechmann, J. (Bremen, 1985), p. 393Google Scholar; AE.CP. Prusse 171 fos. 239–41, La Touche to Saint-Contest.

41 Black, J., “The British Navy and British Foreign Policy in the first half of the eighteenth century,” in Essays in European History in Honour of Ragnhild Hatton (Lennoxville, Quebec, 1985), pp. 137–55Google Scholar.

42 Baugh, D., “Why did Britain lose command of the sea during the war for America?“ in Black, and Woodfine, , eds., The British Navy and the Use of Naval Power in the Eighteenth Century (Leicester, 1988) pp. 149–63Google Scholar; AE.CP. Espagne 536 fo. 60. Choiseul to Ossun, 17 Apr. 1762.

43 Black, J., “Anglo-French Alliance,” p. 298Google Scholar; Black, ,“Fresh Light on the Fall of Townshend,” Historical Journal 29 (1986): 57–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 The best short guide to international relations in this period is McKay, D. and Scott, H. M., The Rise of the Great Powers 1648–1815 (London, 1983)Google Scholar.

45 Newport, South Wales, Hanbury-Williams papers, Newcastle to Hanbury-Williams, 28 July 1752; P.R.O. SP. 80/191, 194, Newcastle to Keith, 2 Feb. 1753, Holdernesse to Keith, 5 July 1754.

46 Black, J., “The theory of the Balance of Power in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century: a note on sources,” Review of International Studies 9 (1983): 56–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; BL, Add. MS. 35006, fos. 18, 36, Gunning to Keith, 7 July, James Harris, envoy in Berlin, to Keith, 21 July 1773; Monitor 6 Feb. 1762.

47 London Chronicle, 26 Jan. 1762.

48 BL, Add. MS. 23827, fo. 356, Fawkener to Robinson, 19 Apr. 1748.

49 BL, Add. MS. 24162, fos. 141–2, 208, Walpole to Grantham, 6 Nov., Stormont to Grantham, 22 Dec. 1775.

50 Reading, Berkshire County Record Office, Trumbull papers 136, Ralph Bridges to Sir William Trumbull, 23 Oct. 1711 (os); Old England 24 Mar. 1750 (os).

51 P.R.O., SP. 88/71. Newcastle to Hanbury-Williams, 5 R:b. 1751 (os).

52 Symcox, ,“Britain and Victor Amadeus II,“ pp. 151–52Google Scholar; Niedhart, G., Handel und Krieg in der Britischen Weltpolitik, 1738–63 (Munich, 1979)Google Scholar.

53 Black, J., British Foreign Policy in the Age of Walpole (Edinburgh, 1985), pp. 93–117Google Scholar.

54 AE.CP. Espagne 506 fos. 26, 532, fo. 10, Puysieulx to Vaulgrenant, envoy in Madrid, 20 Jan. 1750, Ossun to Choiseul, 3 Apr. 1761.

55 Anon., The Conduct of the Ministry Impartially Examined (1760), p. 38Google Scholar.

56 London Chronicle, 26 Jan. 1762.

57 BL, Add. MS 35356, fo. 128, Joseph Yorke to Hardwicke, 13 Mar. 1753.

58 BL, Add. MS. 35410, fos. 131–32, 35411, fo. 187, 32820, Newcastle to Hardwicke, 25 Aug. 1749 (os), 25 Oct. 1750, Newcastle to Keene, 12 Feb. 1750 (os); AE.CP. Espagne 470 fo. 90, Rennes to Amelot, 5 Feb. 1742; Smith, L. B., Spain and Britain 1715–1719: The Jacobite Issue (New York, 1987)Google Scholar.

59 McLachlan, J., Trade and Peace with Old Spain, 1667–1750 (Cambridge, 1940)Google Scholar; Walker, G. J., Spanish Politics and Imperial Trade, 1700–1789 (London, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 BL, Add. MS 35412, fo. 16, 35355, fo. 372, Newcastle to Hardwicke, 6 Sept. 1751 (os), Yorke to Hardwicke, 8 Sept. 1751.

61 Middleton, R., The Bells of Victory. The Pitt-Newcastle Ministry and the Conduct of the Seven Year's War 1757–1762 (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 217–18Google Scholar; Lasala, J. A. Lalaguna,“England, Spain and the Family Compact, 1763–83,“ (Ph.D. diss., University of London, 1968)Google Scholar; Rice, G. W., “Great Britain, the Manila Ransom, and the First Falkland Island Dispute with Spain, 1766,” International History Review 2 (1980): 386–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 P. R. O. SP. 84/454 fos. 6–7, 12–13, 46–8, 89–97, 242–43, 254, Holdernesse to Newcastle, 6, 23 Jan., 17 March, Newcastle to Holdernesse, 2, 5, 16 Jan., 13 March 1750 (os).

63 BL, Add. MS. 35505, fo. 324, Stormont to Keith, 24 June 1773; Bodleian, Bland Burges, 30 fo. 58, Auckland to Burges, 11 Sept. 1790.

64 BL, Add. MS. 32858, fo. 333, Newcastle to Holdernesse, 29 Aug. 1755, Add. MS. 35411, fo. 271, Newcastle to Hardwicke, 27 July 1751 (os).

65 Black, J., “Anglo-Russian Relations after the Seven Years' War,” Scottish Slavonic Review 9 (1987): 27–37Google Scholar. Cunningham, A.. “The Ochakov Debate,” Middle Eastern Studies 1 (1964–1965): 209–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ehrman, J., The Younger Pitt. The Reluctant Transition (London, 1983), pp. 3–31Google Scholar.

66 BL, Add. MS. 35003, fo. 246, Stormont to Keith, 2 Sept. 1772.

67 P. R. O., SP. 80/196 fos. 60, 94, Robert Keith, envoy in Vienna, to Holdernesse, 4, 19 June 1755.

68 P. R. O., SP. 88/79, Holdernesse to Hanbury-Williams, 10 Sept. 1756.

69 Important recent work on this period includes Spencer, F., ed., The Fourth Earl of Sandwich: Diplomatic Correspondence 1763–1765 (Manchester, 1961)Google Scholar; Scott, H. M., “Great Britain, Poland and the Russian Alliance, 1763–1767,“ Historical Journal 19 (1976): 53–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Metcalf, M., Russia, England and Swedish Party Politics, 1762–1766 (Stockholm, 1977)Google Scholar; Scott, , “British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution,” International History Review 6 (1984): 113–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dull, J., A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution (New Haven, 1985)Google Scholar.

70 Gosforth, Northumberland Record Office, ZSW. 534/11, Irby to Humphry Morice, 18 March 1761; BL, Add. MS. 32890, fos. 132–35, Newcastle memorandum, 18 Apr. 1759.

71 Cobban, A., Ambassadors and Secret Agents. The Diplomacy of the First Earl of Malmesbury at the Hague (London, 1954)Google Scholar; Black, J., “The Marquis of Carmarthen and Relations with France 1784–1787, “ Francia 12 (1985); 283–303Google Scholar.

72 Lord Fife and his Factor, eds. Tayler, A. and Tayler, H. (London, 1925), p.237Google Scholar; Murley, J. T., “The Origin and Outbreak of the Anglo-French War of 1793,“ (D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, 1959)Google Scholar; Ehrman, , The Younger Pitt, pp. 196–258Google Scholar; Blanning, T. C. W., The Origins of the French Revolutionary Wars (London, 1986), pp. 131–59Google Scholar; Black, J. “Anglo-French Relations in the Age of the French Revolution, 1787–1793, “ Francia 15 (1988)Google Scholar.

73 Duffy, M., “Britis h War Policy: Th e Austrian Alliance, 1793–1801, “ (D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar; Jupp, P., Lord Grenville, 1759–1834 (Oxford, 1985), pp. 152–261Google Scholar; Roider, K. A., Baron Thugut and Austria's Response to the French Revolution (Princeton, 1987), pp. 103–360Google Scholar; BL. Althorp MS. G 173, Lord Grenville, Foreign Secretary, to Earl Spencer and Thomas Grenville, envoys in Vienna, 29 Aug., 14 September 1794.