Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:28:05.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Growth of Political Stability Reconsidered*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Clayton Roberts
Get access

Extract

It has been twenty-seven years since Professor Plumb, now Sir John Plumb, delivered the Ford lectures at Oxford University. In a prose that was elegant, spirited, at times colloquial, always luminous, he offered a persuasive explanation for the growth of political stability in eighteenth-century England. Later published as The Growth of Political Stability in England, these lectures were widely read and the explanation offered in them widely accepted. Professor Plumb's thesis became and remains the orthodox interpretation of the political stability that England enjoyed in the eighteenth century.

During the past twenty-seven years, however, a considerable literature has appeared concerning the growth of political stability, some of it occasioned by Professor Plumb's own fertile suggestions. Historians such as J. V. Beckett, Lloyd Bonfield, Christopher Clay, Linda Colley, Norma Landau, John Owen, John Phillips, and Nicholas Rogers have studied the rise of the great estates, the decline of party, the role of patronage, and the politics of deference. The appearance of this literature offers a useful occasion for looking once again at the growth of political stability. In particular, it offers an opportunity to ask how valid is the Plumb thesis, and, if found not to be valid, what alternative explanation can be given for the growth of political stability in eighteenth-century England.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Summer 1993 , pp. 237 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this article was read at the Anglo-American Conference of Historians held in London in July 1988. Research for it was made possible by a National Endowment of the Humanities Fellowship.

References

1 Plumb, J.W., The Growth of Political Stability in England (London, 1967), see esp. pp. xviii, 65, 97, 127, 173Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., pp. xvii, xviii, 1-2, 10, 29-30, 63, 64, 65, 72, 158, 186.

3 Ibid., pp. 9-10, 83, 85-86, 94, 95-96, 134, 139.

4 Habakkuk, H. J., “Marriage Settlements in the Eighteenth Century,” Trans, of the Royal Hist Soc., 4th ser., 32 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “The English Land Market in the Eighteenth Century,” in Britain and the Netherlands, eds. Bromley, J. S. and Kossmann, E. H. (London, 1960)Google Scholar. Plumb does not cite Habakkuk's, “English Landownership, 1680-1740,” Economic History Review 10 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, in which Habakkuk most boldly describes the growth of the great estates, and concludes (p. 5) that “In the character of these changes in the ownership of land lies an important part of the stability of the eighteenth century.” But this thesis does seem to lie behind Plumb's argument.

5 Clay, Christopher, “Property Settlements, Financial Provision for the Family, and Sale of Land by the Greater Landowners 1660-1790,” Journal of British Studies 23, 1 (1981): 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Holderness, B.A., “The English Land Market in the Eighteenth Century: the Case of Lincolnshire,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 27, 4 (Nov. 1974): 573CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Howell, David, “Landlords and Estate Management in Wales,” in The Agrarian History of England and Wales. Vol. V, 1640-1750; Vol. II, Agrarian Change, ed. Thirsk, Joan, p. 261Google Scholar.

8 Jenkins, Philip, The Making of a Ruling Class: the Glamorgan Gentry 1640-1740 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Roebuck, Peter, Yorkshire Baronets 1640-1760 (Oxford, 1980), p. 289Google Scholar.

10 Hughes, Edward, North Country life in the Eighteenth Century: The North-East, 1700-1750 (Oxford, 1952), p. xviiiGoogle Scholar.

11 Beckett, J. V., “English Landownership in the Later Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: the Debate and the Problems,” Economic History Review, 2nd Ser., 30, 4 (Nov. 1977): 575CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Thompson, F. M. L., “The Social Distribution of Landed Property in England since the Sixteenth Century,” Economic History Review, 2nd Ser., 19, 3 (1966): 512CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Bonfield, Lloyd, Marriage Settlements, 1601-1740: The Adoption of the Strict Settlement (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 101-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Clay, Christopher, “Marriage, Inheritance, and the Rise of Large Estates in England, 1660-1815,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 21, 3 (Dec. 1968): 507-13Google Scholar.

15 Beckett, J. V., “English Landownership in the Later Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: The Debate and the Problems,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 30, 4 (Nov. 1977): 573-87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp. 13, 35, 83, 95–96Google Scholar; idem., “The Growth of the Electorate in England from 1600 to 1715,” Past and Present 45 (Nov. 1969): 111.

17 Holmes, Geoffrey, The Electorate and the National Will in the First Age of Party (Lancaster, 1975), p. 18Google Scholar.

18 See O'Gorman's, Frank table of the electorate and the population throughout the eighteenth century, in Voters, Patrons and Parties: The Unreformed Electoral System of Hanoverian England, 1734-1832 (Oxford, 1989), p. 179Google Scholar.

19 Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 96Google Scholar.

20 Cannon, John, Parliamentary Reform 1640-1832 (Cambridge, 1973), pp. 278-89Google Scholar.

21 Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 29Google Scholar.

22 Phillips, John, Electoral Behavior in Unreformed England: Plumpers, Splitters and Straights (Princeton, 1982), p. 61Google Scholar.

23 Ibid., p. 64. Phillips excludes the burgage boroughs from these calculations.

24 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp. 69, 85Google Scholar.

25 Phillips, , Electoral Behavior, pp. 56, 85Google Scholar.

26 Ransome, Mary, “Some Recent Studies of the Composition of the House of Commons,” The University of Birmingham Historical Journal 6 (1958): 139-42Google Scholar.

27 Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 91Google Scholar.

28 Ibid., pp. 44-46.

29 Landau, Norma, “Independence, Deference, and Voting Participation: The Behaviour of the Electorate in Early Eighteenth-Century Kent,” The Historical Journal 22, 3 (1979): 561-82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rogers, Nicholas, Whigs and Cities (Oxford, 1989), pp. 228, 367, 390-91, 398–402Google ScholarPubMed; O'Gorman, , Voters, Patrons and Parties, pp. 3-10, 104-05, 224-25, 237-45, 265, 281, 385-86Google Scholar.

30 Plumb, , “Political Man,” in Man versus Society in Eighteenth Century Britain, ed. Clifford, James (Cambridge, 1968), pp. 9-10, 20–21Google Scholar.

31 Plumb, , “Growth of the Electorate,” Past and Present 45 (Nov., 1969): 116Google Scholar.

32 Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 187Google Scholar.

33 Cannon, John, Aristocratic Society (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 105-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp. xvi, 13, 14, 19, 32, 33, 99-100 108, 112, 118, 120, 122, 125, 126, 129, 132Google Scholar.

35 Fortescue, J. W., A History of the British Army, 13 vols. (London, 1935), 1: 556, 2: 17Google Scholar; Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 99Google Scholar; Clowes, William Laird, The Royal Navy, 7 vols. (London, 1898), 3: 5Google Scholar.

36 Collinge, J. M., Office-Holders in Modern Britain. Vol. 7, Navy Board Officials (London, 1978), pp. 21–80Google Scholar.

37 Horn, D. B., The British Diplomatic Service: 1689-1789 (Oxford, 1961), p. 44Google Scholar.

38 Sykes, Norman, Church and State in England in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge, 1934), p. 155Google Scholar; Sainty, John, A List of English Law Officers, King's Counsel and Holders of Patents of Precedence (London, 1987), pp. 41, 59, 77, 83–94Google Scholar.

39 Sainty, John, Office-Holders in Modern Britain. Vol. 2, Officials of the Secretaries of State, 16601782, pp. 59, 60; Vol. 3, Officials of the Board of Trade, 1660-1870, pp. 78, 79Google Scholar; Vol. 4, Admiralty Officials, 1660-1870, pp. 100, 101; Vol. 1, Treasury Officials, 1660-1870, pp. 101, 102.

40 Hughes, Edward, Studies in Administration and Finance (Manchester, 1934), pp. 306-16Google Scholar; Hoon, Elizabeth, The Organization of the Customs System (New York, 1988),pp. 199–201Google Scholar.

41 Speck, W. A., Stability and Strife:England 1714-1760 (London, 1977), p. 160Google Scholar.

42 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp. 33, 189Google Scholar.

43 Owen, John, “Political Patronage in Eighteenth-Century England,” in The Triumph of Culture, eds. Fritz, Paul and Williams, David (Toronto, 1972), pp. 374-75, 377, 382-85Google Scholar. For the number of those who deserted the government see Sedgwick, Romney, The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1715-1754, 2 vols. (London, 1970), 1: 81, 87Google Scholar. Dickinson, H. T., (Walpole and the Whig Supremacy [London, 1972], pp. 66-67, 74, 80Google Scholar) assesses the importance of patronage much as Owen does; Colley, Linda (In Defiance of Oligarchy [Cambridge, 1982], p. 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar) defends Plumb's assessment.

44 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp. 82, 102, 126, 127-28, 137, 153-54, 157, 186Google Scholar.

45 For the story of the formation and fall of these ministries, see Horwitz, Henry, Parliament, Policy, and Politics in the Reign of William III (Manchester, 1977), pp. 94-96, 117-19, 216-17, 257-58, 260, 269-70Google Scholar; Roberts, Clayton, Schemes and Undertakings (Columbus, Ohio, 1985), pp. 113-116, 121-126, 134, 145-55, 169-70, 186-98, 219Google Scholar.

46 H.M.C., Downshire MSS, I, pt. 2, p. 867Google Scholar.

47 Commons Journal, 16: 684Google Scholar.

48 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp. 82, 163-65, 167-73. 189Google Scholar.

49 O'Gorman, , Voters, Patrons and Parties, pp. 108-09Google Scholar.

50 Rogers, , Whigs and Cities, p.7Google ScholarPubMed.

51 Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 82, n.2Google Scholar.

52 Hill, B. H., The Growth of Parliamentary Parties, 1689-1742 (London, 1976), pp. 147–231Google Scholar; Cruickshanks, Eveline, Political Untouchables (London, 1979), pp. 1–13Google Scholar, and her Introductory Survey to Sedgwick, , The House of Commons, 1715-1754, 1: 1–78Google Scholar; Colley, Linda, In Defiance of Oligarchy, pp. 7, 55-84, 118-45Google Scholar; Clark, J. C. D., “The Decline of Party, 1740-1760,” English Historical Review 93 (1978): 499–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Rogers, Nicholas, (“Party Politics During the Whig Ascendancy,” Canadian Journal of History 18, 2 [August, 1983]: 253-60CrossRefGoogle Scholar) and Speck, William (“Whigs and Tories Dim Their Glories,” in The Whig Ascendancy, ed. Cannon, John, pp. 56–70)Google Scholar have criticized the works of these authors-but less to reject than to modify their views.

53 The surface stability of these years was also promoted, as Jeremy Black has shown (Robert Walpole and the Nature of Politics in Early Eighteenth Century Britain, [London, 1990])Google Scholar, by Walpole's financial acumen, his skillful management of Parliament, his widespread use of patronage, and his avoidance of contentious legislation.

54 Speck, , Stability and Strife, pp. 146-59Google Scholar.

55 Plumb, Political Stability, p. xvi.

56 Ibid., pp. 102, 157. For an extensive but inconclusive discussion of the definition of political stability, see Cannon, , ed. The Whig Ascendancy, pp. 180-87Google Scholar.

57 For a study of these riots and disturbances, see Stevenson, John, Popular Disturbances in England 1700-1870 (London, 1979)Google Scholar.

58 Morrice, Roger, Entring Book, 2: 645Google Scholar (in Dr. Williams's library).

59 Roberts, , Schemes and Undertakings, pp. 10-13, 38-42, 60-66, 102–104Google Scholar.

60 Browning, Andrew, Thomas Osborne, Earl of Danby and Duke of Leeds, 3 vols. (Glasgow, 1931), 1: 166, 191-93, 238, 247, 265, 275, 283-84, 316–317Google Scholar.

61 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp 33, 101, 107, 179Google Scholar.

62 Ibid, pp. 156, 178, 179.

63 Plumb, , England in the Eighteenth Century (Harrnondsworth, 1950), p. 73Google Scholar.

64 Roberts, , Schemes and Undertakings, pp. 134-41, 150-54, 174-95, 217-30Google Scholar; Hill, , Growth of Parliamentary Parties, pp. 69-74, 81-82, 108-09, 126-27, 177-78Google Scholar; Dickinson, , Walpole and the Whig Supremacy, pp. 51–65Google Scholar; Fryer, W. R., “The Study of British Politics Between the Revolution and the Reform Act,” Renaissance and Modem Studies 6 (1962): 98Google Scholar; Owen, John, “George II Reconsidered,” in Statesmen, Scholars and Merchants, ed. Whiteman, Anne (Oxford, 1973), pp. 127-28Google Scholar.

65 Chandeman, C. D., English Public Revenue, 1660-1688 (Oxford, 1975), pp. 249-55Google Scholar.

66 Roberts, Clayton, “The Constitutional Significance of the Financial Settlement of 1690,” The Historical Journal 20 (1977): 59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Roberts, , Schemes and Undertakings, pp. 113, 114-15, 170, 215–216Google Scholar; Hill, , Growth of Parliamentary Parties, pp. 181-91, 222-26Google Scholar; Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 189Google Scholar.

68 Ibid., p. 154.

69 Cowper, William, The Private Diary of William First Earl Cowper (Eton, 1833), pp. 43–44Google Scholar.

70 For these various resignations, see Roberts, , Schemes and Undertakings, pp. 189, 215-16Google Scholar; Sedgwick, , House of Commons, 1: 25, 26Google Scholar; Owen, John, The Eighteenth Century (London, 1974), pp. 66–67Google Scholar.

71 Roberts, , Schemes and Undertakings, pp. 127-28Google Scholar.

72 Sykes, , Church and State in England, pp. 38, 46–47Google Scholar.

73 Walpole himself made good use of this fact. As a member of the Admiralty Council in 1705 he secured places for his two younger brothers, as Secretary at War in 1708 he weeded Tories out of the War Office and replaced them with Whigs, and in 1714 he used the Paymaster's patronage to help his friends and relatives at the expense of minor Tory officials (Dickinson, , Walpole and the Whig Supremacy, pp. 24, 28, 46Google Scholar).

74 A cursory review of the Newcastle papers from 1727 to 1760 shows that the nominations of the ministers were accepted by the king in roughly nine out of ten instances. I am now at work on a more precise study of the bestowal of office, seeking to give quantitative support to the merely impressionistic.

75 A similar cursory review shows that of some fifty quarrels between George II and his ministers over the bestowal of place, the ministers prevailed in over two-thirds of the cases. Dickinson, H. T. writes (Walpole and the Whig Supremacy, p. 71)Google Scholar: Walpole “could never be certain that his friends would be appointed to important offices or that his dangerous rivals would be dismissed, though in most instances, after wearisome discussions with the King, he succeeded.” Pares, Richard observes (King George III and the Politicians [Oxford, 1953], p. 63)Google Scholar: George II's “personal dislikes may really have obstructed the promotion of those whom his ministers did not very much want to promote….But when they really wanted to get their way, they got it….”

76 Plumb, , Political Stability, pp. 18, 21, 22Google Scholar; Plumb, , Men and Centuries (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), pp. 20–21Google Scholar.

77 Plumb, , Political Stability, p. 112Google Scholar.

78 Ibid., p. 69.

79 Ibid., p. 26.

80 Cragg, G. R., From Puritanism to the Age of Reason (Cambridge, 1950), pp. 10, 13, 30, 67, 74, 86, 218, 219Google Scholar.

81 Watts, Michael R., The Dissenters, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1978), 1: 3, 261, 263-64, 270, 385-86, 391-92Google Scholar.

82 For a discussion of these social and economic forces working for stability, see Holmes, Geoffrey, “The Achievement of Stability: the Social Context of Politics from the 1680s to the Age of Walpole,” and the Colloquy upon that paper, in Cannon, The Whig Ascendancy, pp. 2–26Google Scholar.

83 Thompson, F. M. L., “The Social Distribution of Landed Property in England since the Sixteenth Century,” Economic History Review, 2nd. ser., 19, 3 (1966): 512CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Lawrence and Jeanne Stone concur with this view, though they point out that most of the transfer of land occurred in the 1540s and early 1550s (Lawrence, and Stone, Jeanne C. Fawtier, An Open Elite? England 1540-1880 [Oxford, 1984], pp. 30, 296Google Scholar).

84 Marshall, Dorothy, English People in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1957, p. 231Google Scholar.