Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:34:33.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

England Is No Longer an Island: The Phantom Airship Scare of 1909

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Alfred M. Gollin
Get access

Extract

The British people and their rulers have always been concerned about the possibility of an invasion of their island home by a hostile power striking at them from the European continent. Arthur Balfour, the Prime Minister who did so much to modernize the defense arrangements of his country in the early years of the present century, was especially concerned with this problem of invasion. He called it “This eternal and most important question of our safety against invasion.” In 1908 an entirely new element was introduced into this area of strategic thinking when it was realized, for the first time, that Britain might be invaded from the air. Until this year the British could take comfort from the often quoted words of Admiral Lord St. Vincent to a group of nervous fellow peers at the time of the French invasion danger early in the nineteenth century: “I do not say they cannot come, my Lords, I only say they cannot come by sea.” Now, as a result of unprecedented technological developments it was possible for a vigilant and forward-looking observer to contemplate an air assault upon the United Kingdom that would put Lord St. Vincent's pithy maxim in an entirely new light. Eventually, the fear of air attack assumed a dominating position in the minds of British defense planners; but the origins of this problem have not been studied closely by scholars, even though they deserve attention.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Spring 1981 , pp. 43 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dugdale, Blanche E.C., Arthur James Balfour, 2 vols. (London, 1936), 1:365.Google Scholar

2 Quoted in Marder, Arthur J., From the Dreadnought to Scapa Flow: The Royal Navy in the Fisher Era, 1904-1919, 5 vols. (London, 1961–1970), 1:347.Google Scholar

3 Memorandum, 8 February 1908, Wright Brothers Papers, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.

4 P.R.O., Air 1/1608, 15 December 1904.

5 Walker, Percy B., Early Aviation at Farnborough, 2 vols. (London 1971–1974), 2:18.Google Scholar

6 Memorandum by W. Wright Esq., 8 February 1907, Wright Brothers Papers, Library of Congress. See also Gollin, Alfred, “The Mystery of Lord Haldane and Early British Aviation,” Albion 11 (1979):46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 See Walker, , Early Aviation, 2:3–76.Google Scholar

8 Gibbs-Smith, Charles H., The Rebirth of European Aviation (London, 1974), p. 222.Google Scholar

9 See Pound, Reginald and Harmsworth, Geoffrey, Northcliffe (London, 1959), p. 301.Google Scholar

10 Daily Mail, 17 November 1906.

11 Ibid., 15 November 1906.

12 Wallace, Graham, Flying Witness, Harry Harper and the Golden Age of Aviation (London, 1958), p. 44.Google Scholar

13 Undated document entitled “Lord Northcliffe,” written during the 1st World War, Beaverbrook Papers, c/261, House of Lords Record Office.

14 For the relationship see Norman, and MacKenzie, Jeanne, H.G. Wells (New York, 1973), p. 222Google Scholar. Dunne, and the Wrights also, are actually mentioned in The War in The Air. Walker, (Early Aviation, 2:163ffGoogle Scholar) has an excellent account of Dunne's work. See also P.R.O., Air 1/1613/204/88/10 for Dunne's diary and his flight trials in Scotland.

15 Wells, H.G., Experiment in Autobiography (New York, 1934) p. 569.Google Scholar

16 Wells, H. G., The War in The Air (London, 1971), p. 161Google Scholar. The power of Wells' novel is stressed in Halévy, Elie, A History of the English People in the Nineteenth Centur—VI, The Rule of Democracy, 1905-1914 (Book II), (London, 1952), p. 411.Google Scholar

17 P.R.O., Cab. 16/7. “Report and Proceedings of a Sub-Committee of The Committee of Imperial Defence on Aerial Navigation,” dated 28 January 1909, and marked “Secret.” See Minutes of Second Meeting, Tuesday 8th December 1908, p. 41.

18 Gibbs-Smith, Charles H., The Invention of the Aeroplane (London, 1966), p. 122.Google Scholar

19 New York Herald (Paris Edition), 6 October 1908.

20 Marder, , Dreadnought, 1:136.Google Scholar

21 Sweet, D.W., “Great Britain and Germany 1905-1911,” in Hinsley, F.H., ed., British Foreign Policy Under Sir Edward Grey (Cambridge, 1977), p. 221.Google Scholar

22 Gollin, Alfred, The Observer and J.L. Garvin (London, 1960), p. 33.Google Scholar

23 Halévy, , The Rule of Democracy, p. 394Google Scholar. The standard work on the naval rivalry of this period is Woodward, E.L., Great Britain and the German Navy (London, 1935)Google Scholar; see also Mackay, Ruddock F., Fisher of Kilverstone (Oxford, 1973), p. 350ff.Google Scholar

24 The Daily Mail, 11 July 1908.

25 Gibbs-Smith, , The Rebirth of European Aviation, p. 279.Google Scholar

26 The Observer, 16 August 1908.

27 See The Aeronautical Journal, July 1906, pp. 37-38.

28 For comment on SirMaxim's, Hiram idea see The Times, 21 December 1908.Google Scholar

29 The Daily Mail, 11 July 1908.

30 See also The Times, 23 December 1908, also owned by Northcliffe.

31 Parliamentary Debates, (Commons), 4th series, 192 (21 July 1908), col. 1735.Google Scholar

32 The best published account of Captain Bacon's initiative is in Higham, Robin, The British Rigid Airship, 1908-1931 (London, 1961), pp. 35ffGoogle Scholar. See also Roskill, Stephen W., ed., Documents Relating to the Naval Air Service (London, 1969), p. 6Google Scholar; Marder, Arthur ed., Fear God and Dread Nought, 2 vols. (London, 1956), 2:186Google Scholar; and also a privately printed Vickers history, Scrope, H.E., Golden Wings, The Story of Fifty Years of Aviation By the Vickers Group of Companies (London, 1958), p. 7Google Scholar. For Admiral Fisher's influence on Bacon's activities in this connection see P.R.O., Air 1/2442/614.

33 P.R.O., Cab. 16/7. “Report and Proceedings of A Sub-Committee of the Committee of Imperial Defence on Aerial Navigation,” dated 28 January 1909 and marked “Secret.” The members of this Sub-Committee were appointed in October 1908.

34 For the final report see P.R.O., Cab. 4/3. C.I.D. 106-B. “Aerial Navigation Report of Sub-Committee,” 28 January 1909, marked “Secret.” For the Committee of Imperial Defence's approval of the Report see P.R.O., Cab. 2/2, “Committee of Imperial Defence. Minutes of 101st Meeting, February 25,1909,” marked “Secret.”

35 P.R.O., Cab. 4/3. C.I.D. 106-B. “Aerial Navigation. Report of a Sub-Committee …,” p. 5, 28 January 1909, marked “Secret.” See also Roskill, , Documents Relating to the Naval Air Service, pp. 11ffGoogle Scholar; and Walker, , Early Aviation, 2:284ff.Google Scholar

36 Halévy, , The Rule of Democracy, p. 403.Google Scholar

37 Marder, , Dreadnought, 1:149.Google Scholar

38 Hale, Oron James, Publicity and Diplomacy (New York, 1940), p. 341.Google Scholar

39 Marder, , Dreadnought, 1:169Google Scholar; Hale, , Publicity and Diplomacy, p. 363Google Scholar; Halévy, , The Rule of Democracy, p. 403Google Scholar; Hirst, F.W., The Six Panics (London, 1913), p. 94.Google Scholar

40 Marder, , Dreadnought, 1:181–2.Google Scholar

41 For a full account of the speech see Westminster Gazette, 5 May 1909.

42 See Haldane to Northcliffe, 4 May 1909, B.L. Add. MSS., Northcliffe Papers.

43 20 May 1909.

44 17 May 1909.

45 Parliamentary Debates, (Commons), 5th series, 5 (17 May 1909), col. 6.Google Scholar

46 From the report in the Morning Post, 20 May 1909. All the newspapers carried these accounts which were sent to the London papers by the Cardiff Correspondent of the Press Association.

47 Hale, , Publicity and Diplomacy, p. 354.Google Scholar

48 Steiner, Zara S., Britain and the Origins of the First World War (New York, 1977), p. 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 Daily Mail, 21 May 1909.

50 Northcliffe to Garvin, 22 May 1909, Garvin Papers, University of Texas.

51 Parliamentary Debates, (Commons), 5th series, 5 (24 May 1909), col. 812Google Scholar. The questioner was Sir John Barlow, Liberal M.P. for Frome in Somerset. He asked if it were true that there were sixty-six thousand trained German soldiers in England or if there were “in a cellar within a quarter of a mile of Charing Cross, 50,000 stands of Mauser rifles and 7-1/2 millions of Mauser cartridges ….” For further details about these rifles see Marder, , Dreadnought, 1:181.Google Scholar

52 Collier, Basil, The Defence of The United Kingdom (London, 1957), p. 1.Google Scholar