Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:59:57.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empire and Social Reform: British Liberals and the “Civilizing Mission” in the Sugar Colonies, 1868–1874

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

James Patterson Smith
Get access

Extract

In contrast to the spirit of laissez-faire, the Colonial Office under Gladstone's first government served as a large-scale social engineering agency concerned with the cautious restructuring of volatile societies in the sugar-producing colonies of the West Indies and the Indian Ocean. From the perspective of the Colonial Office civilizing the barbarian made him more governable. There is a revealing paradox in the fact that so much of what Victorian Liberals did in the name of civilizing benighted natives involved active government initiatives in imperial settings. Under the banner of “peace, retrenchment, and reform” nineteenth-century British Liberals advocated cost-cutting and laissez-faire at home and non-expansion abroad. Liberal leaders' public statements in this vein helped set the historiographical stereotype of supposed Gladstonian Liberal “little Englandism” versus a dramatic imperial policy shift toward “forward movement” in the Disraelian Conservative era. Scholarship over the last thirty years has refuted this older view and has stressed the continuity of British imperialism throughout the nineteenth century. However, a careful examination of the details of policy reveals that from 1868–74 the Liberals not only valued the Empire, but were willing to sacrifice their own theories of limited government in order to strengthen the British hold—even on their bankrupt sugar colonies in the Caribbean and Indian oceans. Initiatives in colonial religion, education, health, justice, and labor regulation demonstrate a surprising Liberal bent toward government activism in the non-white Empire. Moreover, the self-conscious and energetic manipulation of such a wide range of policy tools reveals a serious Liberal commitment to empire, which further belies the old notion that from 1868–74, “little Englandism” reached its high point.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Summer 1995 , pp. 253 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The works of R. L. Schuyler, C. A. Bodelsen, and A. P. Newton created the pre-World War II orthodox view that set the “little England” stereotype of Liberal imperial policy. See Schuyler, R. L., The Fall of the Old Colonial System: A Study in British Free Trade, 1770–1870 (New York, 1945), pp. 245–76Google Scholar; Schuyler, R. L., “The Climax of Anti-Imperialism in England,” Political Science Quarterly 36 (1921): 537–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bodelsen, C. A., Studies in Mid-Victorian Imperialism (London, 1924), pp. 8 and 88–91Google Scholar; and Newton, A. P., “International Colonial Rivalry: The New World, 1815–1870,” in The Cambridge History of the British Empire, ed. Rose, J. H., Newton, A. P., and Benians, E. A., Vol. 2: The Growth of the New Empire 1783–1870 (Cambridge, 1940), pp. 525–47Google Scholar. The works of Ronald Robinson and John Gallagher first challenged the orthodox view in the 1950s and early 1960s. For the development of this debate see John Gallagher and Robinson, Ronald, “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review, 2nd Ser., 6 (1953): 1–15Google Scholar; Robinson, Ronald and Gallagher, John with Denny, Alice, Africa and the Victorians: The Official Mind of Imperialism (London, 1961)Google Scholar; Other works contributing to the revisionist view include Knox, B. A., “Reconsidering Mid-Victorian Imperialism,” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 1 (1973): 155–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eldridge, C. C., England's Mission: The Imperial Idea in the Age of Gladstone and Disraeli, 1868–1880 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Victorian Imperialism (Atlantic Highlands, N.J., 1978); Farnsworth, Susan, The Evolution of British Imperial Policy During the Mid-Nineteenth Century: A Study of the Peelite Contribution, 1846–74 (New York, 1992)Google Scholar; and Smith, James Patterson, “Retrenchment, Reform, and Empire: Lord Kimberley and the Liberal Imperial Dilemma, 1868–74,” (Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University, 1984)Google Scholar, in revision for publication. The expansionist impulse in Liberal colonial policy is stressed in McIntyre, W. D., The Imperial Frontier in the Tropics, 1865–75 (London, 1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Storch, Robert D., “The Problem of Working-Class Leisure: Some Roots of Middle Class Reform in the Industrial North 1825–1850,” in Social Control in Nineteenth Century Britain, ed. Donajgrodzki, A. P. (London, 1977), pp. 138–42Google Scholar; A. P. Donajgrodzki, “‘Social Police’ and the Bureaucratic Elite: A Vision of Order in the Age of Reform,” in ibid., pp. 51–59; and Roberts, David, Paternalism in Early Victorian England (New Brunswick, N.J., 1979), pp. 6–10Google Scholar.

3 Johnson, Richard, “Educational Policy and Social Control in Early Victorian England, 1833–39” Past & Present 49 (November 1970): 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Johnson, Richard, “Educating the Educators: ‘Experts’ and the State 1822–29,” in Social Control, ed. Donajgrodzki, , pp. 77–80 and 94–95Google Scholar.

4 Moore, David C., The Politics of Deference: A Study of the Mid-Nineteenth Century English Political System (New York, 1976), pp. 9–12, 234, 295–96, and 407–08Google Scholar; Roberts, , Paternalism, pp. 1–10Google Scholar.

5 Vincent, John, The Formation of the Liberal Party 1857–68 (London, 1966), pp. 211–14Google Scholar.

6 For Victorian reflections on the problem of West Indian government see Mills, Arthur, “Our Colonial Policy,” Contemporary Review 11 (June 1869)Google Scholar, and Gardner, W. J., A History of Jamaica From Its Discovery by Christopher Columbus to the Year 1872 (London, 1873; repr., 1971)Google Scholar. Secondary treatments of the government problem may be found in Knight, Franklin W., The Caribbean: The Gennesis of a Fragmented Nationalism (Second ed.; New York, 1990), pp. 159–92Google Scholar; Ayearst, Morley, The British West Indies: The Search for Self Government (London, 1960), p. 17Google Scholar; Hamilton, Bruce, Barbados and the Confederation Question, 1871–1885 (London, 1956), p. 12Google Scholar; Samuel, and Hurwitz, Edith, Jamaica; A Historical Portrait (New York, 1971), p. 177Google Scholar; Wrong, Hume, Government of the West Indies (Oxford, 1923), p. 78Google Scholar; Parry, J. H. and Sherlock, P. M., A Short History of the West Indies (New York, 1966), p. 215Google Scholar; Higham, C. S. S., “Sir Henry Taylor and the Establishment of Crown Colony Government in the West Indies,” Scottish Historical Review 23 (January 1926): 94Google Scholar; and Williams, Eric A., A History of the People of Trinidad and Tobago (London, 1962), p. 132Google Scholar.

7 Gordon to Kimberley, 30 May 1871, The Gladstone-Gordon Correspondence, 1851–1896: Selections From the Private Correspondence of a British Prime Minister and a Colonial Governor, ed. Knaplund, Paul, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new ser., 51 (1961): 58Google Scholar; Gordon to Kimberley, 1 June 1871, Colonial Office Files (CO.), Confidential Correspondence Relating to Indian Immigrants in Mauritius, CO. 882/2, Public Record Office, Kew, Richmond, Surrey; and Chapman, J. K., The Career of Arthur Hamilton Gordon: First Lord Stanmore 1829–1912 (Toronto, 1964), pp. 103–05CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Kimberley to Gladstone, 23 August 1871, Gladstone Papers, British Library, London, Add. Mss. 44224/139.

9 Reddaway, W. F., “International Colonial Rivalry; Great Britain and France, 1848–1870,” The Cambridge History of the British Empire, ed. Benians, E. A., et al., Vol. 2Google Scholar: The Growth of the New Empire 1783–1870 (Cambridge, 1940), p. 563Google Scholar; Van Alstyne, Richard, “Britain in Latin America After 1865,” Current History 28 (March 1955): 149Google Scholar; Bartlet, Christopher, “British Reaction to the Cuban Insurrection of 1868–1878,” Hispanic American Historical Review 37 (August 1957): 296–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Jacobs, Charles C., “Jamaica and the Cuban Ten Years War, 1868–1878,” Jamaica Journal 44 (June 1980): 80–92Google Scholar.

10 Ainslie to the Military Secretary, 18 December 1867, Colonial Office Files, West Indies, Public Record Office, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, C.O. 318/254.

11 Minute by Rogers on War Office to Colonial Office, 23 January 1868, C.O. 318/254; War Office Comfidential Memorandum, “Considerations on the Military Position of Great Britain with Respect to the United States, 28 May 1869,” Gladstone Papers, Add. Mss. 44610, f. 53; Report of Colonel Drummond Jervois, 19 May 1869, Granville Papers, P.R.O. 30/29/53; Memorandum by Hugh Childers, 14 May 1869, Gladstone Papers (Cabinet Memorandums), Add. Mss. 44637, f. 59; and Wilkinson, Henry C., Bermuda Fron Sail to Steam: The History of the Island from 1784 to 1901, 2 vols., (London, 1973), 2: 743–55Google Scholar.

12 Barkly to Granville, 10 April 1869, C.O. 882/2; Storks to Sanford, 12 June 1869, C.O. 882/2; Kimberley Diary, 29 May 1870, Kimberley Papers, A-3, Oxford, The Bodleian Library; Gordon to Gladstone, 3 May and 2 June 1871, The Gladstone-Gordon Correspondence, ed. Knaplund, , 51: 57Google Scholar; Gordon to Kimberley, 2 June 1871, and Kimberley to Gordon, 9 June 1871, Kimberley Papers G-130; and Kimberley to Gladstone, 6 June 1871, Gladstone Papers, Add. Mss. 44224/139.

13 Holt, Thomas C., The Problem of Freedom: Race, Labor, and Politics in Jamaica and Britain, 1832–1938 (Baltimore, 1992), pp. xxii–xxiii, and 307–08Google Scholar; Lorimer, Douglas A., Colour, Class and the Victorians: English Attitudes to the Negro in the Mid-Nineteenth Century (New York, 1978), pp. 119–23Google Scholar; and Bolt, Christine, Victorian Attitudes to Race (London, 1971), pp. 77–105Google Scholar.

14 Gregory to Kimberley (Private) 21 March 1872, Kimberley Papers, G-132.

15 Mannoni, O., Prospero and Caliban: The Psychology of Colonization, trans. Powesland, Pamela (New York, 1956), pp. 11, 32, 102–04, 120–26, and 203–04Google Scholar; and Thornton, A. P., Doctrines of Imperialism (New York, 1965), pp. 191–94Google Scholar.

16 Wodehouse to Granville, 17 June 1870, C.O. 879/2/7; Parliamentary Debates (Lords), 3rd ser., vol. 209 (8 March 1872): 1622–33Google Scholar; “Autobiographical Notes,” in The Letters of Frederick Lord Blachford, ed. Marindin, George E. (London, 1896), p. 298Google Scholar; Kimberley to Barkly, 21 July 1871, C.O. 879/2/101; Kimberley to Barkly, 6 October 1872, Kimberley Papers, G-110; Kimberley to Barkly, 17 October 1870, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 47 [C.459], p. 450Google Scholar; Barkly to Kimberley, 31 May 1871, C.O. 879/2/85; and Blachford, Frederick Lord, “South African Policy,” The Nineteenth Century 6 (August 1879): 269Google Scholar.

17 Grant to Granville, 23 July 1869, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 (269), pp. 568–69Google Scholar; Chambers to Kimberley, 12 October 1872, Parliamentary Papers, 1873, vol 48 (259), pp. 781–84Google Scholar; and “Memorial of the Jamaica Baptist Union on the Clergy Law,” 1868 in C.O. 137/440.

18 Gladstone, William Ewart, “England's Mission,” The Nineteenth Century 4 (September 1878): 581–82Google Scholar.

19 “Economic Value of Justice to the Darker Races,” The Economist 23 (December 1865): 1487–89Google Scholar.

20 Argyll to the Governor General (India), 12 May 1870, India Office Records, Despatches to India, India Office Library, London, I.O.R. NEG. 4237.

21 Mills, Arthur, “Our Colonial Policy,” Contemporary Review 11 (June 1869): 226–29Google Scholar.

22 Schneider, Frederick D., “The Anglican Church in the British Empire,” (Nashville, unpublished manuscript), p. 678Google Scholar; and Hart, Jenifer, “Religion and Social Control in the Mid-Nineteenth Century,” in Social Control, ed. Donajgrodzki, (London, 1977), pp. 112–22Google Scholar.

23 Minute by Elliot on Grant to Granville, 23 July 1869, C.O. 137/442; Morris to Myers, 1 January 1866, Douet to Myers, 1 January 1866, and Findlay to Myers, 16 January 1866, Parliamentary Papers, 1866, vol. 30 [C. 3682], pp. 40, 86, 89Google Scholar.

24 Rawson to Granville, 17 April 1870, C.O. 28/211.

25 Parliamentary Debates (Lords), 3rd ser., vol. 193 (7 July 1868): 784–85Google Scholar.

26 “Memorial of the Jamaica Baptist Union on the Clergy Law,” 1868, C.O. 137/440; Grant to Granville, 23 July 1869, C.O. 137/442; Chambers to Kimberley, 12 October 1872, Parliamentary Papers, 1873, vol. 48 (259), pp. 781–83Google Scholar; Morris to Myers, 1 January 1866, Parliamentary Papers, 1866, vol. 30 [C. 3682], p. 86Google Scholar; and Lawson to Myers, 11 January 1866, ibid., p. 43.

27 Schneider, , “The Anglican Church in the British Empire,” p. 700Google Scholar; and “West Indian Colonies etc. (Ecclesiastical Funds),” Parliamentary Papers, 1870, vol. 50 (194), p. 811Google Scholar.

28 Granville to Grant, 16 November 1869, C.O. 137/442; Kimberley to Rawson, 13 September and 27 December 1871, Parliamentary Papers, 1873, vol. 48 (259), pp. 721–30 and 747Google Scholar; and Kimberley to Pine, 26 January 1872, ibid., p. 777.

29 “Memorial of the Jamaica Baptist Union on the Clergy Law,” 1868, C.O. 137/440; “Extract from the Minutes of the Northern Presbytery of the Presbyterian Church of Jamaica,” 4 May 1869, C.O. 137/441; and “Memorial of the Missionaries and Ministers of the Gospel in the Parish of St. James” to Granville, June 1869, C.O. 137/441; and The Times (London), 29 June and 12 August 1868Google Scholar.

30 Minute by Granville on Grant to Granville, 23 July 1869, C.O. 137/442.

31 Pine to Kimberley, 5 March, 1872, C.O. 884/2.

32 Grant to Granville, 23 July 1869, C.O. 137/442; Minutes by Granville, Rogers, Taylor, and Elliot on Grant to Granville, 23 July 1869, C.O. 137/442; Rawson to Granville, 17 April 1870, C.O. 28/211; and Message by Governor Longden to the Trinidad Legislative Council, 1 June 1871, enclosed in Longden to Kimberley, 22 July 1871, C.O. 884/2.

33 Minutes by Taylor and Rogers on Grant to Granville, 26 August 1869, C.O. 137/443.

34 Granville to Grant, 16 November 1869, C.O. 137/442; and The Times (London), 13 January and 27 September 1870Google Scholar.

35 Kimberley to Longden, 11 January 1872, C.O. 884/2.

36 Parliamentary Debates (Commons), 3rd ser., vol. 206 (9 June 1871): 1817–20Google Scholar.

37 Victorian views on the relation of education and social control at home are explored in Johnson, Richard, “Educational Policy and Social Control,” pp. 96–119Google Scholar; and idem, “Educating the Educators,” pp. 77–107.

38 Parry, and Sherlock, , A Short History of the West Indies, p. 248Google Scholar; Wilkinson, Henry C., Bermuda from Sail to Steam: The History of the Island form 1784 to 1901, 2 vols. (London Press, 1973), 2: 754Google Scholar; and Chapman, J. K., The Career of Arthur Hamilton Gordon: First Lord Stanmore, 1829–1912 (Toronto, 1964), p. 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Mclean to Eyre, January 1866, Parliamentary Papers, 1866, vol., 30 [C. 3682], p. 76Google Scholar.

40 “Report on the State of Education in Trinidad,” Parliamentary Papers, 1870, vol. 50 (450), p. 666Google Scholar.

41 Grant to Granville, 8 February 1869, C.O. 137/440; Colonial Office Minutes on “Jamaica Report on Schools, 1871,” C.O. 137/465. Gordon to Granville, 24 November 1869, Parliamentary Papers, 1870, vol. 50 (450), p. 761Google Scholar; Elliot Minute on Gordon to Granville, 8 September 1869, C.O. Files, Trinidad, C.O. 295/248; Burn, W. L., The British West Indies (Westport, Conn., 1951), p. 44Google Scholar; Parry, and Sherlock, , A Short History of the West Indies, p. 249Google Scholar; and Chapman, , The Career of Arthur Hamilton Gordon, pp. 64, 136Google Scholar.

42 Stokes, Eric, The English Utilitarians and India (Oxford, 1959), p. 252Google Scholar.

43 Pine to Kimberley, 26 January 1871Google Scholar, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 [C. 353], p. 683Google Scholar; and Statement by Deputation of the Anti-Slavery Society to Governor J. P. Grant, 8 June 1870, Minutebook, Anti-Slavery Society Papers, Rhodes House, Oxford, Mss. Br. Emp. S20/E2/9.

44 “Report on the State of Education in Trinidad,” Parliamentary Papers, 1870, vol. 50 (450), p. 666Google Scholar.

45 Grant to Granville, 8 February 1869, C.O. 137/440; Colonial Office Minutes on “Jamaica Report on Schools, 1871,” C.O. 137/465; Governor Grant's Response to Deputation From the Anti-Slavery Society, 8 June 1870, Anti-Slavery Society Papers, Minutebook, Mss. Br. Emp. S20/E2/9.

46 Brereton, Bridget, Race Relations in Colonial Trinidad, 1870–1900 (Cambridge, 1979), pp. 72–73Google Scholar.

47 “Report on the State of Education in Trinidad,” Parliamentary Papers, 1870, vol. 50 (450), pp. 665–704Google Scholar.

48 Gordon to Granville, 8 September 1869, and Granville to Gordon, 12 November 1869, C.O. 295/248; Gordon to Granville, 24 November 1869, Parliamentary Papers, vol. 50 (450), pp. 761–68Google Scholar; and Carmichael, Gertrude, The History of the West Indian Islands of Trinidad and Tobago (London, 1961), p. 265Google Scholar.

49 Wood, Donald, Trinidad in Transition: The Years After Slavery (London, 1968), pp. 268–69Google Scholar.

50 The Times (London), 16 February 1874Google Scholar; and Clarke to Grant, 28 April 1873, Anti-Slavery Society Papers, Mss. Br. Emp. S22/G65.

51 Tinker, Hugh, A New System of, Slavery: The Export of Indian Labour Overseas 1830–1920 (Oxford, 1974), pp. xiv–xvGoogle Scholar. Tinker exhaustively studies a system of pervasive abuse of indentured plantation workers, which remained “a blot on the British Empire” until it ended in the aftermath of World War I.

52 Holt, Thomas C., The Problem of Freedom: Race, Labor, and Politics in Jamaica and Britain 1832–1938 (Baltimore and London, 1992), pp. 142–49 and 270–71Google Scholar.

53 Eyre to Cardwell, January 1866, Parliamentary Papers, 1866, vol. 30 [C. 3682], pp. 12–18Google Scholar.

54 The disturbances at Morant Bay in 1865 are treated in the following: Cundall, Frank, Political and Social Disturbances in the West Indies: A Brief Account and Bibliography (London, 1906)Google Scholar; Wrong, Hume, Government of the West Indies (Oxford, 1923), p. 74Google Scholar; Burn, W. L., The British West Indies (Westport, Connecticut, 1951), 140–42Google Scholar; Erickson, Arvel, “Empire or Anarchy: The Jamaica Rebellion of 1865,” The Journal of Negro History 44 (April 1959): 99–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Burns, Alan Sir, History of the British West Indies (London, 1965), pp. 672–73Google Scholar; Semmel, Bernard, Democracy Versus Empire: The Jamaica Riots of 1865 and the Governor Eyre Controversy (New York, 1969), pp. 11–23Google Scholar.

55 Gordon to Kimberley, 1 June 1871, 8 August 1871, 2 September 1871, and 17 October 1871, C.O. 882/2; Gordon to Gladstone, 3 May 1871, and Gordon to Kimberley, 31 May 1871, in Gladstone Gordon Correspondence, 1851–1896: Selections From the Private Correspondence of a British Prime Minister and A Colonial Governor, ed. Knaplund, , vol. 51, pt. 4, pp. 56–58Google Scholar.

56 Des Voeux to Granville, 25 December 1869, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 20 [C. 393], pp. 487–500Google Scholar.

57 Des Voeux to Granville, 25 December 1869, Parliamentary Papers, 1871 vol. 20 [C. 393], pp. 487–500Google Scholar; and Des Voeux, George William, My Colonial Service in British Guiana, St. Lucia, Trinidad, Fiji, Australia, New Foundland, and Hong Kong, 2 vols. (London, 1903), 1: 119–121Google Scholar.

58 Ibid.

59 West India Committee to Granville, 24 May 1870, C.O. 318/258.

60 Colonial Office to Governors Gordon, Pine, Rushworth, Scott, Rawson, and Grant, 27 May 1870, C.O. 318/259; and India Office to Colonial Office, 28 October 1872, C.O. 882/2.

61 Rogers to MacGregor, 31 May 1870, C.O. 318/258; and Kimberley to Gordon, 19 January 1872, Kimberley Papers, G-130.

62 Murdock to Rogers, 26 January and 16 February 1870, C.O. 318/259.

63 Granville to Pine, 21 June 1869 and 16 May 1870, and Pine to Granville, 11 December 1869, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 [C. 353], pp. 629, 634, and 666Google Scholar; and Parliamentary Debates (Lords), 3rd ser. vol. 106 (19 May 1871): 1024Google Scholar.

64 Pine to Granville, 23 March 1870, Petition to Kimberley 24 August 1870, and Pine to Kimberley, 12 December 1870, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 [C. 353] pp. 654–60, 664, and 673–74Google Scholar.

65 Grant to Granville, 19 December 1869, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 [C. 334], pp. 7–8Google Scholar; “Thirtieth General Report of the Emigration Commission, 1870,” ibid., 1870. vol. 17 [C. 196], 139–46; and “Thirty-First General Report of the Emigration Commission, 1871,” ibid., 1871, vol. 20 [C. 369], 355–59.

66 Mills, , “Our Colonial Policy,” 217Google Scholar; The Times (London), 4 January 1878Google Scholar, quoted in Low, D. A., Lion Rampant: Essays in the Study of British Imperialism (London, 1973), p. 55Google Scholar.

67 Thor's hammer was the lightning rod, a symbol of justice, see Kimberley Diary, 9 February 1871, Kimberley Papers, A-3. Kimberley's personal diary now available in his private papers at the Bodleian contains many comments not published in the Journal below which he apparently intended for publication.

68 John, , first Earl of Kimberley, A Journal of Events During the Gladstone Ministry 1868–1874, ed. Drus, Ethel, The Camden Miscellany, vol. 21 (London, 1958), 14 December 1869Google Scholar, and 2 March 1870, pp. 10 and 12; and Parliamentary Debates (Lords) 3rd ser., vol. 200 (20 March 1870): 817–21Google Scholar, vol. 206 (2 May 1871): 1–14, and vol. 214 (June 1873): 628–29.

69 The Times (London), 28 October 1868Google Scholar; and Pine to the Legislative Assembly of Nevis, 1 December 1870, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 [C. 353], pp. 678–79Google Scholar.

70 Kimberley to Dufferin, 28 August 1872, Kimberley Papers, G-119.

71 Kimberley to Gladstone, 18 August 1873, and 27 May 1874, Gladstone Papers, Add. Mss. 44225, 80 and 150–53; Kimberley to Goschen, 12 September 1873, and Cardwell to Goschen, 12 September 1873, quoted in Elliot, Arthur D., The Life of George Joachim Goschen 1831–1902, 2 vols. (London, 1911), 2: 122–24Google Scholar; and The Times (London) 25 September 1873Google Scholar.

72 Sturgis, James L., John Bright and the Empire (London, 1969), p. 40Google Scholar.

73 Wodehouse to Ripon, 17 January 1866, Ripon Papers, British Library, London, Add. Mss. 43522/ff. 93–95; See also opinion to this effect in Spedding, J., “The Future of the British Empire,” Westminster Review 38 (July 1870): 58–60Google Scholar; and The Times (London), 4 November and 13 November 1865Google Scholar.

74 Grant to Major General O'Connor, 17 August 1869, C.O. 137/443; Lowe to Cardwell, 9 November 1870, Cardwell Papers, The Public Record Office, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, P.R.O. 30/48/22; Colonial Office to War Office, 19 April 1873, C.O. 318/272; and Kimberley Minute 25 May 1873, C.O. 318/272.

75 Barkly to Buckingham, 16 November 1868, Barkly to Granville, 29 April 1869, and Storks to Sanford, 12 June 1869, C.O. 882/2.

76 Emigration Board to Governor Scott, 10 March 1870, and Murdock to Rogers, 24 August 1870, C.O. 318/259.

77 Hurwitz, and Hurwitz, , Jamaica: A Historical Portrait, pp. 180–81Google Scholar; and Gardner, , A History of Jamaica, pp. 495–505Google Scholar.

78 Granville to Pine, 21 June 1869 and 16 May 1870, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 [C. 353], pp. 629 and 666Google Scholar; Pine to Granville, 11 December 1869, ibid., 634; Pine to Kimberley, 12 December 1870, ibid., 676–77; and Parliamentary Debates (Lords), 3rd ser., vol. 106 (19 May 1871): 1024Google Scholar.

79 Gregory to Kimberley, 14 November 1873, Kimberley Papers, G-132; Pope-Hennessy, James, Verandah, Some Episodes in the Crown Colonies, 1867–1889 (New York, 1964), pp. 184–85Google Scholar; and Endacott, G. B., A History of Hong Kong (London, 1958), p. 161Google Scholar.

80 Scott to Kimberley, 21 December 1871, C.O. 884/2.

81 Gordon to Kimberley, 8 August 1871, C.O. 882/2.

82 Murdock to Colonial Office, 26 July 1872, C.O. 882/2; and Barnwell, P. J. and Toussaint, A., A Short History of Mauritius (London, 1949), pp. 157–60Google Scholar.

83 Official Secretary to the Government of Bengal to Secretary to the Government of India, 7 May 1872, CO. 882/2.

84 Gordon to Kimberley, 8 August 1871, C.O. 882/2; and Scott to Kimberley, 21 December 1871, C.O. 884/2.

85 Ryan to Kimberley, 8 February 1872, C.O. 882/2; and Gordon to Kimberley, 14 November 1871 and 9 February 1872, C.O. 882/2.

86 Murdock to Rogers, 18 January 1868, C.O. 318/252; Murdock to Colonial Office, 10 January 1872, C.O. 882/2; and Kimberley to Gordon, 16 December 1871, C.O. 882/2.

87 Circular Despatch to West Indian Colonies, 8 February 1870, C.O. 318/259.

88 Murdock to Elliot, 21 October 1868, C.O. 318/252; Rogers Minute on Murdock to Rogers, 31 October 1868, C.O. 318/252; Colonial Office Circular to Coolie Importing Colonies, 1 February 1869, C.O. 318/255; and Colonial Office to India Office, 2 October 1870, C.O. 318/259.

89 Secretary of State's Minute on Murdock to Rogers, 31 October 1868, C.O. 318/252; Sturge to Normandy, 17 April 1871, Anti-Slavery Society Papers, Mss. Br. Emp. S22/G101A; and Bishop Ryan to Kimberley, 8 February 1872, C.O. 882/2.

90 Colonial Office to Emigration Commission, 2 December 1868, C.O. 318/252.

91 Statement by Deputation of the Anti-Slavery Society to Governor J.P. Grant, 8 June 1870, and Minutes, 6 December 1872, Minutebook, Anti Slavery Society Papers, Mss. Br. Emp. S20/E2/9; Clarke to Grant, 28 March and 28 April 1873, Anti-Slavery Society Papers, Mss. Br. Emp. S22/G65; and The Times (London) 16 February 1874Google Scholar.

92 Pine to Granville, 23 March 1870, Parliamentary Papers, 1871, vol. 48 [C. 353], p. 664Google Scholar.

93 The Times (London), 15 June 1868 and 18 July 1868Google Scholar; Gordon, to Gladstone, , 3 May 1871, Gladstone-Gordon Correspondence, ed. Knaplund, , p. 46Google Scholar. Gordon was “appalled” at Mauritius' taxation, which fell “almost wholly on the poor” while the rich were “pretty nearly exempted from taxation.”

94 Taylor Minute, 14 July 1869, on Cairns to Pine, 28 June 1869, C.O. Files, St. Christopher, C.O. 239/121; and Taylor Minute on Grant to Granville, 23 July 1869, C.O. 137/442.