Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T02:44:18.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Communications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 393 note 1 To justify isolating businessmen Stone replies (using Daniel Duman) that only 25% of barristers in 1885 came from “business backgrounds.” What Duman emphasizes, however, is that 75% had fathers generally classifiable as “urban middle class,” and that even in the eighteenth century two-thirds had non-landed backgrounds (pp. 108, 16).

page 394 note 2 I cannot find the promised discussion of this graph.

page 395 note 3 5 George IV c. 87. This is probably Parliament's only real general statement on portions, for Scottish entails were perpetual.

page 395 note 4 Williams, Joshua. The Settlement of Real Estate (1879), p. 220Google Scholar. See also Trumbach, , The Rise of the Egalitarian Family (New York, 1979), p. 103.Google Scholar

page 395 note 5 Nor can I discuss legal forms–Stone's emphasis on a form fundamentally impracticable, of no account.

page 396 note 6 The Guardian, Sept. 6, 1984.

page 396 note 1 Reviewed in this issue, pp. 332-34 (Editor).