Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:28:30.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beaverbrook As Historian: “Politicians and the War, 1914-1916” Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

John O. Stubbs
Get access

Extract

For students interested in the political history of Britain during the early years of the Great War, Lord Beaverbrook's Politicians and the War, 1914-1916 is now essential reading. This, however, has not always been the case. The historiographical fortunes of this important study, Beaverbrook's modus operandi, and his preoccupations as a historian are the main concerns of this paper. Examination of these issues, combined with a reassessment of of certain key themes and incidents in Politicians and the War allow for a reevaluation not only of the book as a major source for the period but also of that wonderful and partisan fusion of politics and history who was Max Aitken, the first and only Lord Beaverbrook.

Beaverbrook, as A.J.P. Taylor's vast biography makes clear, was a man of many parts. Politics colored almost everything he did. His politics were those of the Unionist (later the Conservative) Party and, as a Canadian colonial who had come to Britain to augment further his considerable fortune, he identified strongly with the Tariff Reform wing of the party in the years before the First World War. He was Unionist MP for Ashton-under-Lyne from 1910 to 1916. Within the Unionist Party his closest friend was Andrew Bonar Law, another Canadian born politician, who in 1911 became Leader of the party and was thus a central figure in the tumultuous events examined in Politicians and the War. Aitken also had a wide circle of friends and acquaintances in the Liberal Party. They, too, provided him with another perspective on the politics of the wartime period; one of them, David Lloyd George, in one of his earliest acts as Prime Minister in December 1916, elevated Aitken to the House of Lords where he took the title of Lord Beaverbrook.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , Winter 1982 , pp. 235 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Beaverbrook, Lord, Politicians and the War (London, 1960)Google Scholar. The book was originally published in two sections in 1928 and 1932.

2 Taylor, A.J.P., Beaverbrook (London, 1972).Google Scholar

3 SirMax Aitken, M.P., Canada in Flanders: The Official Story of the Canadian Expeditionary Force (London, 1916), p. vii.Google Scholar

4 Beaverbrook, Lord, Politicians and the Press (London, n.d. [1925]).Google Scholar

5 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 230.Google Scholar

6 An exception were the reviews in the Beaverbrook Press by two men who were hardly political intimates at the time—the Labour politician Philip Snowden, and, more surprisingly, the fiercely Liberal journalist, A.G. Gardiner. As editor of The Daily News, in 1916 Gardiner had staunchly defended the Liberal Prime Minister, Herbert Asquith, against not only the intrigues of the Unionists but also against those of the ultimately successful Liberal intriguer, David Lloyd George (Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 251Google Scholar; see also pp. 51,335).

7 The Times Literary Supplement, 17 May 1928, p. 366Google Scholar; The Nation and Athenaeum, 26 May 1928, pp. 256–7Google Scholar; The New Statesman, 2 June 1928, pp. 260–1.Google ScholarPubMed

8 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, pp. 251, 312.Google Scholar

9 The Spectator, 21 May 1932, p. 718Google ScholarPubMed. The reviewer was Richard Law, the son of Law, Bonar. The Times Literary Supplement, 26 May 1932, p. 375Google Scholar; The New Statesman, 28 May 1932, pp. 707–8.Google Scholar

10 Jenkins, Roy, Asquith (London, 1967), pp. 475–6Google Scholar, fn. 1.

11 See, for example, two recent articles by McEwen, J.M., “The Struggle for Mastery in Britain: Lloyd George Versus Asquith, December 1916,” The Journal of British Studies 18 (Fall 1978): 131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “The Press and the Fall of Asquith,” The Historical Journal 21 (1978): 863–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Fair, John D., “Politicians, Historians and the War: A Reassessment of the Political Crisis of December 1916,” The Journal of Modern History 49 (September 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, on-demand supplement.

12 Beaverbrook, Lord, Men and Power (London, 1956), p. xli.Google Scholar

13 I have discussed these matters elsewhere in more detail. See Stubbs, J.O., “The Impact of the Great War on the Conservative Party,” in Peele, Gillian and Cook, Chris, eds., The Politics of Reappraisal, 1918-1939 (London, 1975), pp. 14–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jalland, Patricia and Stubbs, John, “The Irish Question after the Outbreak of War in 1914: Some Unfinished Party Business,” The English Historical Review 96 (Oct. 1981): 778–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 93.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., Lord Beaverbrook, “The Man Who Likes to Stir Things Up,” in Martin Gilbert, ed., A Century of Conflict: Essays for A.J.P. Taylor (London, 1966), p. 3.

16 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 312.Google Scholar

17 Young, Kenneth, Churchill and Beaverbrook: A Study in Friendship and Politics (New York, 1966), pp. 88–9.Google Scholar

18 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, pp. 229–30, 102, 178.Google Scholar

19 Young, , Churchill and Beaverbrook, pp. 105–6.Google Scholar

20 Beaverbrook, Lord, Politicians and the War 1914-1916 (London, 1960), p. 106Google Scholar. Others who accept this thesis include, for example, Blake, Robert, The Unknown Prime Minister: The Life and Times of Andrew Bonar Law, 1858-1923 (London 1955), pp. 241–2Google Scholar; Taylor, A.J.P., Politics in Wartime and Other Essays (London, 1964), p. 20Google Scholar; Hazlehurst, Cameron, Politicians at War, July 1914 to May 1915: A Prologue to the Triumph of Lloyd George (London, 1971), p. 265Google Scholar; Gollin, Alfred, “Freedom or Control in the First World War (The Great Crisis of May 1915),” Historical Reflections 2 (Winter 1976): 135–155Google Scholar. Pugh, Martin D., “Asquith, Bonar Law and the First Coalition,” Historical Journal 17 (1974): 813–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar, interestingly argues that Asquith had considerably more freedom of action than is normally assumed and that he chose Coalition as a way to avoid a future General Election.

21 Beaverbrook, , Politicans and the War, p. 68.Google Scholar

22 Hewins, W.A.S., Apologia of an Imperialist: Forty Years of Empire Policy, 2 vols. (London, 1929), 2:30Google Scholar. See also the parliamentary debates on the drink question, April-May 1915.

23 Garvin, J.L., “The Admiralty Crisis of May 1915 and the Crash of the Cabinet,” 6 October 1919Google Scholar, Beaverbrook MSS., House of Lords Record Office, Box 3, Folder IV; see the Pall Mall Gazette, Tuesday, 18 May 1915, and The Observer, Sunday, 23 May 1915; Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 103.Google Scholar

24 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, pp. 87–8.Google Scholar

25 Hewins, , Apologia of an Imperialist, vol. 2, passimGoogle Scholar. The original diaries plus the minute books and other items of the Unionist Business Committee are in the Hewins MSS., Sheffield University Library.

26 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, p. 104.Google Scholar

27 See, for example, the paragraph summarizing Bonar Law's weaknesses in the May 1915 crisis which Beaverbrook subsequently excised from the first draft of Politicians and the War (Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 93Google Scholar).

28 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, p. 200.Google Scholar

29 Rae, John, Conscience and Politics: The British Government and the Conscientious Objector to Military Service, 1916-1919 (London, 1970)Google Scholar touches briefly on the subject in chs. 1-3. Robert Blake has suggested that conscription “would indeed be a tedious topic to pursue through all its ramifications. The endless discussions … constitute a chapter in English history to which no doubt in years to come dull history professors will direct their research students.” To which Alfred Gollin has sardonically replied: “It may, perhaps, be observed in this connection that dullness, like beauty, resides in the eye of the beholder” (Robert Blake, The Unknown Prime Minister: p. 282; Gollin, A.M., Proconsul in Politics: A Study of Lord Milner in Opposition and in Power: With an Introductory Section, 1854-1905 [London, 1964], p. 275.Google Scholar)

30 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, p. 104.Google Scholar

31 Parliamentary Recruiting Committee Minute Books, British Library, Add. MSS., 54192; Minute Book of the Executive Committee of the National Union, Conservative Central Office, London.

32 Law to Asquith, 15 May 1915, encl. in Law to Lansdowne, 15 May 1915, Bonar Law MSS., House of Lords Record Office. Robert Sanders, a Unionist whip then on duty in France, returned for the Unionist Party meeting on the coalition on 26 May and “learnt … from Edmund [Talbot—the chief whip] that the Unionist leaders went in without any guarantees as to National Service” (Sanders diary, 13 Sept. 1915, pp. 83-4, Conservative Research Department, London). At the Party meeting the question of National Service was raised by two dissident peers but “nobody could tell me that our leaders had exacted any pledge from Asquith as the price of surrendering their independence beyond asking for a certain number of seats in the Cabinet” (Lord Willoughby de Broke to Leo Maxse, 5 June 1915, Maxse MSS., 470/224-5, West Sussex Record Office). See also the “official” and sanitized report of the meeting in The Times 27 May 1915.

33 See The Times, 1916, passim for the activities of the Unionist War Committee.

34 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, pp. 288–9.Google Scholar

35 71 H.C. Deb., 5s, cols. 1968-76, 14 December 1915.

36 87 H.C. Deb., 5s, cols. 249-364, 8 November 1916.

37 Nigerian Division: Summary,” Carson MSS., Northern Ireland Public Record Office, Belfast, D 1507/5/64; Morning Post 10 November 1916.

38 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, pp. 294–5Google Scholar; see also various drafts of this section of the book in “History of the Crisis,” Box 4, File XXI, Beaverbrook MSS.

39 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 108.Google Scholar

40 The question has been carefully examined in the articles cited in footnote 11.

41 Rt. Hon. SirChamberlain, Austen, Down the Years (London, 1937), pp. 122–3.Google Scholar

42 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, p. 479.Google Scholar

43 Austen Chamberlain to Walter Long, 11 December 1923, A. Chamberlain MSS., University of Birmingham Library, AC 15/3/21.

44 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, p. 516.Google Scholar

45 Long to Austen Chamberlain, 7 December 1923, A. Chamberlain MSS., AC 15/3/20.

46 Francis Stevenson to Beaverbrook, 15 October 1928, Beaverbrook MSS., Box 3, Folder II.

47 Chamberlain to Lord Robert Cecil, 10 July 1931, A. Chamberlain MSS., AC 15/3/39.

48 Beaverbrook to Crewe, 28 September 1928, Beaverbrook MSS., Box 3, Folder II; Beaverbrook, Lord, Men and Power, 1917-1918 (London, 1956), esp. pp. 309–23Google Scholar. Mosley, Leonard, The Glorious Fault: The Life of Lord Curzon (New York, 1960).Google Scholar

49 Beaverbrook to unidentified correspondent, n.d. [1928], Beaverbrook MSS., Box 3, Folder II.

50 Beaverbrook, , Politicians and the War, n.p. [p. 9].Google Scholar

51 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 103.Google Scholar

52 Law to Beaverbrook, 31 May 1919; Taylor, , Beaverbrook, pp. 104–5.Google Scholar

53 See footnote 19.