Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2009
1. The fourth and final volume of HALAT moved in this direction, though not with the completeness of DCH; see my review in AJS Review 18 (1993): 95–102.Google Scholar
2. Cohen, Cf. H. R. [C], Biblical Hapax Legomena in the Light of Akkadian and Ugaritic (Missoula, Mont, 1978), p. 42.Google Scholar
3. For a survey of opinions, see Rendsburg, G. A., “Hebrew ′Sdt and Ugaritic HSdym” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 8 (1980): 81–84.Google Scholar
4. See Cohen, Biblical Hapax Legomena, pp. 46–47.
5. See most recently Greenfield, J. C., “Etymological Semantics,” Zeitschriftfur Althebraistik 6 (1993): 26–37, in particular pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
6. A Linguistic Study of the Relationship Between the Priestly Source and the Book of Ezekiel (Paris, 1982), p. 19.Google Scholar