Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T22:35:53.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Chiseled from all Sides”: Hermeneutics and Dispute in the Rabbinic Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2005

William Kolbrener
Affiliation:
Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Get access

Extract

Among contemporary literary theorists—and in the humanities in general—theological approaches toward interpretation have been dismissed in favor of hermeneutic models committed to the contingency, partiality, and historicity of all interpretative practice. Against the grain of this tendency, which tends to dismiss all vestiges of theology from postmodern habits of reading and interpretation, critics like Daniel Boyarin and David Stern, have, over the past decades, attempted to recover the distinctly Jewish modes and discourses of reading and interpretation. In the process, they have, as Boyarin himself underlines, introduced a specifically Jewish mode of reading—that of midrash—into the literary theoretical canon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 by the Association for Jewish Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)