No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2009
1. Propp, V., “Morfologija skazki” (1928), translated as “Morphology of the Folktale,” International Journal of American Linguistics 24, no. 4 (1958).Google Scholar
2. See Saussure, F. de, Cours de linguistique generate (1916), translated as Course in General Linguistics, ed. Ch. Bally and A. Riedlinger (New York: Philosophical Library, 1959).Google Scholar
3. Ch. Hockett, F., A Course in Modern Linguistics, 2nd ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1962).Google Scholar
4. Pike, K. L., Phonemics: A Technique for Reducing Languages to Writing (Glendale, Calif.: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1943).Google Scholar
5. Saussure, Course in General Linguistics.
6. Based upon the subcategorization rules in Noam Chomsky's famous Aspects Model. N. Chomsky, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1965), pp. 120 ff.
7. See, for example, U. Maas, Pragmatik und Sprachliches Handeln (Frankfurt a. M: Athenaeum, 1972).
8. For example, Neusner, J., Form-Analysis and Exegesis: A Fresh Approach to the Interpretation ofMishnah, with Special Reference to Mishnah-Tractate Makhshirin (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1980).Google Scholar
9. Incidentally, this essay was first published by a team of Egyptologists. A. Assmann and J. Assmann, eds., Kanon und Znsur. Archdologie der literarischen Kommunikation II (Munich: Fink, 1987), pp. 201–211.
10. D. J. Halperin, The Faces of the Chariot, Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum 16 (TQbingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1988).
11. Bülhler, K., Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache (1934; reprint ed., Stuttgart and New York: Fischer, 1982);Google Scholar and Ehlich, K., Verwendungen der Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln, linguistisch-philologische Untersuchungen zum hebräischen deiktischen System (Frankfurt a. M.: Lang, 1979).Google Scholar
12. The reviewer of this book was a student and collaborator of Goldberg's for eleven years (1975–86).