Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:23:35.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of analytics in the design of sociotechnical products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

David Van Horn  and
Kemper Lewis
David Van Horn
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University at Buffalo–SUNY, Buffalo, New York, USA
Kemper Lewis*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University at Buffalo–SUNY, Buffalo, New York, USA
*
Reprint requests to: Kemper Lewis, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University at Buffalo–SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of analytics has been emerging as a way to better understand the complex dynamics and resulting trends that occur when social and technical systems intersect. For instance, web analytics studies the intersection between society and the Internet to better understand use patterns and preferences. Business analytics studies the interfaces between human capital and technical systems in the context of corporate management and industrial production. Engineering design is ripe with such sociotechnical systems where consumers and engineered systems intersect producing a complex sociotechnical system marked by difficult to predict behavior and trends. In this paper, the paradigm of design analytics is further developed and used to study a diverse sociotechnical product. The product is a refrigerator that is hypothetically equipped with sensors and feedback mechanisms, and a simulator models the interactions of a population of 1000 users. Analyzing this sociotechnical product using design analytics demonstrates the ability to extract valuable insights at the juncture of people and technology. Insights into the leading behaviors of different populations are presented, and it is shown that design analytics and the associated tools can provide a platform for designers to develop better performing products that meet both explicit and implicit customer needs.

Keywords

Design AnalyticsProduct Use InformationSociotechnical Product
Type
Regular Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 65 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Badham, R., Clegg, C., & Wall, T. (2000). Sociotechnical theory. In Handbook of Ergonomics (Karwowski, W., Ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Balling, R. (1999). Design by shopping: A new paradigm?Proc. 3rd World Congr. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, pp. 295–297, Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Sociotechnical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interacting With Computers 23(1), 4–17.Google Scholar
Bohm, M.R., & Stone, R.B. (2010). Form follows form—fine tuning artificial intelligence methods. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2010-28774, Montreal.Google Scholar
Bohm, M.R., Stone, R.B., & Nagel, R.L. (2009). Form follows form—is a new paradigm needed? Proc. ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congr. Exposition, Paper No. IMECE2009-10410, Lake Buena Vista, FL.Google Scholar
Bruns, A., Barrett, R., Evans, S., & Johansson, C. (1999). Delighting customers through empathic design. Proc. Int. Product Development Management Conf., Churchill College Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bryant, C.R., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., Kurtoglu, T., & Campbell, M. (2005). Concept generation from the functional basis of design. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Burnap, A., Ren, Y., Papalambros, P., Gonzalez, R., & Gerth, R. (2013). A simulation based estimation of crowd ability and its influence on crowdsourced evaluation of design concepts. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2013-13020, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science 54(3), 477–491.Google Scholar
Clegg, C. (2000). Sociotechnical principles for system design. Applied Ergonomics 31(5), 463–477.Google Scholar
Culey, S. (2012, November–December). Transformers: supply chain 3.0 and how automation will transform the rules of the global supply chain. European Business Review, pp. 40–45.Google Scholar
Cutbill, A., Hajikolaei, K.H., & Wang, G. (2013) Visual HDMR model refinement through iterative interaction. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2013-12663, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Dankbaar, B. (1997). Lean production: denial, confirmation or extension of sociotechnical systems design? Human Relations 50(5), 567–583.Google Scholar
Daskilewicz, M.J., & German, B.J. (2012). Rave: a computational framework to facilitate research in design decision making. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 12(2), 021005–021014.Google Scholar
English, K., Naim, A., Lewis, K.E., Schmidt, S., Viswanathan, V., Linsey, J., McAdams, D.A., Bishop, B., Campbell, M.I., Poppa, K., Stone, R.B., & Orsborn, S. (2010). Impacting designer creativity through IT-enabled concept generation. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 10(3), 031007–031017.Google Scholar
Genco, N., Johnson, D., Hölttä-Otto, K., & Seepersad, C.C. (2011). A study of the effectiveness of empathic experience design as a creativity technique. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2011-021711, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Goncalves, B., & Ramasco, J.J. (2008). Human dynamics revealed through web analytics. Physical Review E 78, 026123.Google Scholar
Grudin, J. (1996). Evaluating opportunities for design capture. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use (Moran, T., & Carroll, J., Eds.), pp. 453–470. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, C., Moorhead, R.J., Munzner, T., Pfister, H., Rheingans, P., & Yoo, T.S. (2006). NIH-NSF Visualization Research Challenges Report. US National Institutes of Health Technical Report. Bethesda, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
Kuijt-Evers, L., & Steen, M. (2008). Early user involvement in designing intelligent products and environments. Proc. 40th Annual Conf. Nordic Ergonomics Society, Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Leonard, D., & Rayport, J.F. (1997). Spark innovation through emapthic design. Harvard Business Review 75(6), 102–113.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewis, K. (2012). Making sense of elegant complexity in design. Journal of Mechanical Design 134(12), 120801.Google Scholar
Lin, J., & Seepersad, C.C. (2007). Empathic lead users: the effects of extraordinary user experiences on customer needs analysis and product redesign. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2007-35302, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Ma, J., & Kim, H. (2013). Continuous preference trend mining for optimal product design with multiple profit cycles. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2013-12163, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Rai, R. (2012). Identifying key product attributes and their importance levels from online customer reviews. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2012-70493, Chicago.Google Scholar
Roskowski, S., Kolm, D., Ruf, M.P., Jaquet, J.R., & Othmer, K. (2011). Data collection associated with components and services of a wireless communication network. I. Carrier IQ, US Patent 20110106942.Google Scholar
Saxena, R., & Srinivasan, A. (2013). A framework for business analytics. In Business Analytics: A Practitioner's Guide, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 186, pp. 1–7. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Shah, J.J. (1998). Experimental investigation of progressive idea generation techniques in engineering design. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs., Paper No. DETC98/DTM-5676, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Stone, R.B., Bohm, M.R., & Szykman, S. (2005). Enhancing virtual product representations for advanced design repository systems. ASME Journal of Computer and Information Science in Engineering 5(4), 360–372.Google Scholar
Stump, G., Yukish, M., Lego, S., Simpson, T.W., & Donndelinger, J.A. (2009). Visual steering commands for trade space exploration: user-guided sampling with example. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 9(4), 044501–044511.Google Scholar
Stump, G., Yukish, M., & Simpson, T.W. (2004). The ARL trade space visualizer: an engineering decision-making tool. Proc. 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf., Paper No. AIAA-2004-4568, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Stump, G., Yukish, M., Simpson, T.W., & Harris, E.N. (2003). Design space visualization and its application to a design by shopping paradigm. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2003/DAC-48785, Chicago.Google Scholar
Subrahmanian, E., & Rachuri, S. (2008). Special issue on engineering informatics (introduction). Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 8(1), 010301–010305.Google Scholar
Tuarob, S., & Tucker, C. (2013). Fad or here to stay: predicting product market adoption and longevity using large scale, social media data. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2013-12661, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Van Horn, D., & Lewis, K. (2013) Design analytics in consumer product design: a simulated study. Proc. ASME Int. Design Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2013-12982, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Van Horn, D., Olewnik, A., & Lewis, K.E. (2012). Design analytics: capturing, understanding, and meeting customer needs using big data. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2012-71038, Chicago.Google Scholar
Yannou, B., Yvars, P.-Y., Hoyle, C., & Chen, W. (2013). Set-based design by simulation of usage scenario coverage. Journal of Engineering Design 24(8), 575–603.Google Scholar
Zikopoulos, P.C., deRoos, D., Parasuraman, K., Deutsch, T., Corrigan, D., & Giles, J. (2012). Harness the Power of Big Data: The IBM Big Data Platform. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar