No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Learning to cope with an open world
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
Abstract
Science has developed detailed and well-founded theories for analyzing the behavior of artifacts. For example, Boeing was able to correctly verify an entirely new airplane, the Boeing 777, before any prototype was even built. However, there are few theories, and no computer systems, that would allow us to design structures with a similar degree of automation.
- Type
- Research Abstracts
- Information
- AI EDAM , Volume 10 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Machine learning in design , April 1996 , pp. 143 - 145
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
REFERENCES
Faltings, B. (1992). Supporting creativity in symbolic computation. Proc. Second Int. Conf, on Computational Models of Creative Design, (Gero, J. & Sudweeks, I., Ed.), pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
Faltings, B., & Sun, K. (1996). FAMING: Supporting innovative mechanism shape design. Computer-Aided Design, (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faltings, B., & Sun, K. (1995). Computer-aided creative mechanism design. Int. Joint Conf. Artif Intell., pp. 2055–2056. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California.Google Scholar
Lenat, D. (1984). The role of heuristics in learning by discovery: Three case studies. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Springer-Verlag, NY.Google Scholar