Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:15:42.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chasing concepts during design: A photo shoot from the field of architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2005

ANN HEYLIGHEN  and
GENEVIÈVE MARTIN
ANN HEYLIGHEN
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
GENEVIÈVE MARTIN
Affiliation:
Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the role of design concepts in a modus operandi as opposed to a modus operatum, which is how their generation, as it unfolds over time, is perceived by someone involved in designing instead of with the hindsight of being finished. To this end, the interactive activation and competition model, commonly used to model the retrieval of information from stored knowledge of individual exemplars, is applied in the context of architectural design. Parsing the data of an architect's think-aloud protocol through this model at successive points in the design process results in a photo shoot of a design concept “under construction.” This allows for the start of appreciating and accounting for the highly elusive character of concepts during design.

Keywords

Architectural DesignDesign ConceptsThink-Aloud Protocol
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 289 - 299
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press.
Becker, H.S. (1998). Tricks of the Trade—How to Think about Your Research While You're Doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Chandrasekaran, B. (1999). Multimodal perceptual representations and problem solving. In Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design (Gero, J.S. & Tversky, B., Eds.), pp. 3–14. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
Churchland, P.S. & Sejnowski, T.J. (1992). The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies 3(4), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1996). Introduction: The Delft Protocols Workshop. In Analysing Design Activity (Cross, N., Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K., Eds.), pp. 1–16. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRef
Damasio, A.R. (2000). The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. London: Vintage.
Darke, J. (1978). The primary generator and the design process. In New Directions in Environmental Design Research (Rogers, W.E. & Ittelson, W.H., Eds.), pp. 325–337. Washington, DC: EDRA.
Downing, F. (2003). Transcending memories: remembrance and the design of place. Design Studies 24(3), 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reposts as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. pp. 102–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (1996). The designer as a team of one. In Analysing Design Activity (Cross, N., Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K., Eds.), pp. 65–91. Chichester: Wiley.
Goldschmidt, G. (1999). The backtalk of self-generated sketches. In Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design (Gero, J.S. & Tversky, B., Eds.), pp. 163–184. Sydney: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
Heylighen, A. & Martin, G. (2004). That elusive concept of concept in architecture. In Design Computing and Cognition '04 (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 57–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Heylighen, A. & Neuckermans, H. (2001). Destination: practice. Towards a maintenance contract for the architect's degree. In Reinventing the Discourse (Jabi, W., Ed.), pp. 90–99. Buffalo, NY: ACADIA.
Kolodner, J.L. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Lawson, B. (1994). Design in Mind. London: Butterworth Architecture.
Leclercq, P. & Heylighen, A. (2002). 5,8 analogies per hour. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '02 (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 285–303. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lemaire, P. (1999). Psychologie Cognitive. Paris: De Boeck Université.
Leupen, B., Grafe, C., Körnig, N., Lampe, M., & De Zeeuw, P. (1997). Design and Analysis. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Can concurrent verbalisation reveal design cognition? In Analysing Design Activity (Cross, N., Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K., Eds.), pp. 437–463. Chichester: Wiley.
McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1988). Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing, pp. 11–47. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McLeod, P., Plunkett, K., & Rolls, E.T. (1998). Introduction to Connectionist Modeling of Cognitive Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, G.L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rowe, P.G. (1987). Design Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schön, D.A. (1963). Displacement of Concepts. London: Tavistock Publications.
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner—How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies 18(4), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar