Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:57:16.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Academic makerspaces as a “design journey”: developing a learning model for how women students tap into their “toolbox of design”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2020

Megan Tomko ,
Wendy Newstetter ,
Melissa W. Alemán ,
Robert L. Nagel  and
Julie Linsey Open the ORCID record for Julie Linsey [Opens in a new window]
Megan Tomko
Affiliation:
George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Wendy Newstetter
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Melissa W. Alemán
Affiliation:
School of Communication Studies, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Robert L. Nagel
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Julie Linsey*
Affiliation:
George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Julie Linsey, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An academic makerspace, home to tools and people dedicated to facilitating and inspiring a making culture, is characterized by openness, creativity, learning, design, and community. This nontraditional learning environment has found an immense increase in popularity and investment in the last decade. Further, makerspaces have been shown to be highly gendered, privileging men's and masculine understandings of making. The spike in popularity warrants deeper analysis, examining the value of these spaces for women and if learning is occurring in these spaces, specifically at higher education institutions. We implemented a phenomenologically based interviewing process to capture the making experiences of 20 women students, recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. By eliciting the narratives of women students, we captured how making, designing, and creating evolved through gendered experiences in the university makerspace. Each interview was transcribed and resulted in around 868 pages of single-spaced text transcriptions. The data were analyzed through multiple cycles of open and axial coding for common themes and patterns, where makerspaces create a culture of learning, facilitate students’ design journey, and form a laboratory for creativity. These themes forwarded the creation of a learning model that showcases how design and learning interact in the makerspace. This work demonstrates that women students are engaging learning and inspiration; developing confidence and resilience; and learning how to work with others and collaborate.

Keywords

Learningmakerspacesphenomenologically based interviewingqualitative researchwomen students
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 34 , Special Issue 3: Thematic Collection: Fablabs, Makerspaces, and Design Spaces , August 2020 , pp. 363 - 373
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barron, C and Barron, A (2016) Seven surprising benefits of maker spaces. Available at: http://www.slj.com/2016/08/technology/seven-surprising-benefits-of-maker-spaces/#_.Google Scholar
Bieraugel, M and Neill, S (2017) Ascending Bloom's Pyramid: fostering student creativity and innovation in academic library spaces. College & Research Libraries 78, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birks, M and Mills, J (2015) Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide, 2nd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bowler, L (2014) Creativity through “Maker” experiences and design thinking in the education of librarians. Knowledge Quest 42, 58–61.Google Scholar
Bowler, L and Champagne, R (2016) Mindful makers: question prompts to help guide young peoples’ critical technical practices in maker spaces in libraries, museums, and community-based youth organizations. Library and Information Science Research 38, 117–124. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, T, Salas, C, Nuriddin, A, Rodgers, W and Subramaniam, M (2014) MakeAbility: creating accessible makerspace events in a public library. Public Library Quarterly 33, 330–347. doi:10.1080/01616846.2014.970425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahms, L and Wardrip, PW (2016) Learning practices of the making. Teaching Young Children 10, 26–29.Google Scholar
Brahms, L and Werner, J (2013) Designing makerspaces for family learning in museums and science centers. In Honey, M and Kanter, DE (eds), Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Brown, B (2017) Rising Strong. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Burke, JJ (2014) Makerspaces: A Practical Guide for Librarians. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Campbell, JL, Quincy, C, Osserman, J, Pedersen, OK, Oserrman, J and Pederson, OK (2013) Coding in-depth semi-structured interview: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research 42, 294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cordova, DI and Lepper, MR (1996) Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, J (2014) The maker movement and the rebirth of constructionism. Hybrid Pedagogy. Available at: http://hybridpedagogy.org/constructionism-reborn/.Google Scholar
Faulkner, S and McClard, A (2014) Making change: can ethnographic research about women Makers change the future of computing? Paper presented at the Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, L (2015) Worlds of Making: Best Practices for Establishing a Makerspace for Your School. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Glaser, BG and Strauss, AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Halverson, ER and Sheridan, KM (2014) The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review 84, 495–504. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intel/Harris_Poll (2020) MakeHers: Engaging girls and women in technology through making, creating, and inventing. Retrieved from https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/technology-in-education/making-her-future-report.html.Google Scholar
Johnson, L, Adams Becker, S, Estrada, V and Freeman, A (2015) NMC Horizon Report: 2015K-12 Edition. Austin, TX. Available at: https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2015-k-12-edition/.Google Scholar
Kafai, Y, Fields, D and Searle, K (2014) Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review 84, 532–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurti, RS, Kurti, D and Fleming, L (2014) Practical implementation of an educational makerspace: part 3 of making an educational makerspace. Teacher Librarian 42, 20–24.Google Scholar
Lande, M and Jordan, S (2014) Making it together, locally: a making community learning ecology in the Southwest USA. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid, Spain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J (2015) Barriers to Women's Involvement in Hackspaces and Makerspaces. The University of Sheffield, unpublished report. Available at: http://access-space.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Barriers-to-womens-involvement-in-hackspaces-and-makerspaces.pdf; http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/144264/.Google Scholar
Litts, BK (2015) Making Learning: Makerspaces as Learning Environments (Doctor of Philosophy). University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651611969?accountid=11648.Google Scholar
Lou, N and Peek, K (2016) Rise of the makerspace. Popular Science.Google Scholar
Make/Intel (2012) Maker market study and media report: an in-depth profile of makers at the forefront of hardware innovation. Retrieved from Makezine.com: https://cdn.makezine.com/make/sales/Maker-Market-Study.pdf.Google Scholar
Martinez, SL and Stager, GS (2013) Invent to Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.Google Scholar
Martinez, SL and Stager, GS (2014) The maker movement: a learning revolution. Learning & Leading with Technology 41, 12–17.Google Scholar
Meyer, A (2018) Feminist makerspaces: making room for women to create. The Riveter.Google Scholar
Papert, S and Harel, I (1991) Situating Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Peppler, K, Halverson, ER and Kafai, YB (2016) Makeology: Makerspaces as Learning Environments, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pernia-Espinoza, A, Sodupe-Ortega, E, Pecina-Marqueta, S, Martinez-Banares, S, Sanz-Garcia, A and Blanco-Fernandez, J (2017) Makerspaces in higher education: the UR-Maker experience at the University of La Rioja. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Head'17 - 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances, Valencia, Spain, 21 Jun 2017–23 Jun 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radniecki, T, Klenke, C and Purpur, E (2016) Makerspaces in academic libraries: opportunities for teaching and learning. Paper presented at the ICERI 2016: 9th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R and Root-Bernstein, M (2013) The art and craft of science. Educational Leadership 70, 16–21.Google Scholar
Schön, S, Ebner, M and Kumar, S (2014) The Maker Movement: implications from modern fabrication, new digital gadgets, and hacking for creative learning and teaching. E-learning Papers, 39. Retrieved from: https://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/Learning-in-cyber-physical-worlds_In-depth_39_2#main-content.Google Scholar
Seidman, I (2006) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, 3rd Edn. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Sheridan, KM and Konopasky, A (2016) Designing for resourcefulness in a community-based makerspace. In Peppler, K Halverson, ER and Kafai, YB (eds), Makeology: makerspaces as Learning Environments, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, K, Halverson, ER, Litts, B, Brahms, L, Jacobs-Priebe, L and Owens, T (2014) Learning in the making: a comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review 84, 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S (2017) Mobile makerspace carts: a practical model to transcend access and space. In Mills, M and Wake, D (eds), Empowering Learners with Mobile Open-Access Learning Initiatives. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 58–73.Google Scholar
Tomko, M (2019) Developing One's “Toolbox of Design” through the Lived Experiences of Women Students: Academic Makerspaces as Sites for Learning (Doctor of Philosophy). Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar
Tomko, M, Nagel, RL, Alemán, MW, Newstetter, WC and Linsey, JS (2018 a) Learning in academic makerspaces: preliminary case studies of how academic makerspaces afford learning for female students. Paper presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Tomko, M, Schwartz, A, Newstetter, W, Alemán, M, Nagel, R and Linsey, J (2018 b) “A makerspace is more than just a room full of tools”: what learning looks like for female students in makerspaces. Paper presented at the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Quebec City, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar