Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:40:14.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated product and process data for business to business collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2004

BOONSERM KULVATUNYOU ,
NENAD IVEZIC ,
RICHARD A. WYSK  and
ALBERT JONES
BOONSERM KULVATUNYOU
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
NENAD IVEZIC
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
RICHARD A. WYSK
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania USA
ALBERT JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Collaborative development of engineered products in a business to business (B2B) environment requires more than the selection of components from an on-line catalogue. It involves the electronic exchange of product, process, and production engineering information during both design and manufacturing. Although the state of the practice does include a variety of ways to exchange product data electronically, it does not extend to the exchange of manufacturing process data. The reason is simple: process data are usually tied to specific manufacturing resources. These resources are not known typically at product development time. This paper proposes an approach called integrated product and process data, in which manufacturing process data are considered during product development. This approach replaces traditional process plans, which are resource specific, with a resource-independent process representation. Such a representation will allow a much wider collaboration among business partners and provide the necessary base for collaborative product development.

Keywords

Collaborative ManufacturingCollaborative Product DevelopmentIntegrated Product and Process DataProcess Planning DecompositionProcess Planning EvolutionVirtual Enterprise
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , August 2003 , pp. 253 - 270
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ballard, C.W. (1991). Basics of Behavior Diagrams. San Jose, CA: Ascent Logic Corporation.
Catron, B.A. & Ray, S.R. (1991). ALPS: A language for process specification. International Journal for Computer Integrated Manufacturing 4(2), 105–113.Google Scholar
Chang, T.C. & Wysk, R.A. (1985). An Introduction to Automated Process Planning Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Defense Systems Management College. (1986, December). Systems Engineering Management Guide. Available on-line at http://www.dan.mil/pubs/pubs%2Dmain.asp#Online
Duane Jaworski and Associates. (2001). Available on-line at http://www.djmetalrep.com
Elmaghraby, S.E. (1977). Activity Networks: Project Planning and Control by Network Models. New York: Wiley.
Erol, K., Hendler, J., & Nau, D.S. (1994). Semantics for Hierarchical Task Network Planning. Technical Report. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., ISR, UMIACS.
Grady, J.O. (1993). System Requirements Analysis. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Gu, P.H. & Elmaraghy, H.A. (1989). A feature-based design description language. ASME Design Engineering Division 17, 53–63.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. (1994). ISO 10303 Part 42: Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 42: Integrated Generic Resources: Geometric and Topological Representation. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
International Organization for Standardization. (1995a). ISO 10303 Part 49: Product Data Representation and Exchange: Part 49: Application Protocol: Integrated Generic Resources: Process Structure and Properties. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
International Organization for Standardization. (1995b). ISO 10303 Part 213: Product Data Representation and Exchange: Part 213: Application Protocol: Integrated Generic Resources: Process Structure and Properties. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
International Organization for Standardization. (2001). ISO 10303 Part 224: Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 224: Application Protocol: Mechanical Product Definition for Process Planning Using Machining Features. International Organization for Standardization.
Knowledge Based Systems, Inc. (2001a). The overview of IDEF0: Function modeling method. Available on-line at http://www.idef.com/overviews/idef0.htm
Knowledge Based Systems, Inc. (2001b). The IDEF3 Process Flow and Object State Description Capture Method Overview Process Description Capture Method. Available on-line at http://www.idef.com/overviews/idef3.htm
Knutilla, A., Schlenoff, C., Ray, S.R., Polyak, S.T., Tate, A., Cheah, S.C., & Anderson, R.C. (1998). Process Specification Language: An Analysis of Existing Representations. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Document 6160. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Kulvatunyou, B. (2001). A resource independent process representation for enterprise-based engineering integration. PhD Thesis. Pennsylvania State University.
Kulvatunyou, B. & Wysk, R.A. (2000). A functional approach to enterprise-based engineering integration. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 19(3), 156–171.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Gruninger, M., Jin, Y., Malone, T., Tate, A., & Yost, G. (1996). The PIF Process Interchange Format and Framework Version 1.1. Technical Report Working Paper 194. MIT Center for Coordination Science.
Merriam–Webster. (2001). Merriam–Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. Available on-line at http://www.m-w.com
MI Standards Committee & Duncan, Bill (1996). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute. Available on-line at http://www.pmi.org/pmi.publictn/pmboktoc1.htm
Rajurkar, K.P. (1990). Technology and research in electrodischarge and electrochemical machining. Fundamental issues in machining. ASME PED 43, 309–336.Google Scholar
Ray, S.R. (1987). Process reasoning. Computers in Industry 9, 329–335.Google Scholar
Schenck, D. & Wilson, P. (1994). Information Modeling the EXPRESS Way. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shah, J.J. & Mantyla, M. (1995). Parametric and Feature-Based CAD/CAM. New York: Wiley.
Subrahmanyam, S. & Wozny, M. (1995). Overview of automatic feature recognition techniques for computer-aided process planning. Computers in Industry 26(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Wright, P. Manufacturing Advisory Service. (2000). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Integrated Manufacturing Lab. Available on-line at http://cybercut.berkeley.edu/mas2/index.html
Wysk, R.A. (1977). An automated process planning and selection program: APPAS. PhD Thesis. Purdue University.
Wysk, R.A., Peters, B.A., & Smith, J.S. (1995). A formal process planning schema for shop floor control. Engineering Design and Automation 1(1), 3–19.Google Scholar