Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T19:36:43.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A framework to analyze knowledge management system adoption through the lens of organizational culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2019

Thierno Tounkara
Thierno Tounkara*
Affiliation:
LITEM, Univ Evry, IMT-BS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91025, Evry, France
*
Author for correspondence: Thierno Tounkara, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although, the knowledge management (KM)-culture research has helped to validate the importance of cultural values for companies' KM initiatives and provided insights into some important values, it still lacks frameworks and analysis outlining how specific types of cultural values might relate to Knowledge Management system (KMS) adoption and subsequent outcomes. In this paper, we provide a three-dimensional framework to help managers articulate how culture affects their unit's ability to create, transfer, and apply knowledge through KMS use. To illustrate the application of the framework, we also present an exploratory case study we have performed in an international organization in the area of development assistance and capacity development.

Keywords

Information systemknowledge managementknowledge management systemorganizational culturetechnology adoption
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 33 , Special Issue 2: Knowledge Engineering and Management Applied to Innovation , May 2019 , pp. 226 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alavi, M, Kayworth, TR and Leidner, DE (2006) An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices. Journal of Management Information Systems 22, 191–224.Google Scholar
Alavi, M and Leidner, DE (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25, 107–136.Google Scholar
Burgelman, RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 223–244.Google Scholar
Cameron, KS and Quinn, RE (2005) Diagnosing and Changing Organisational Culture : Based on the Competing Values Framework, revised Edn, San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Pub.Google Scholar
Chait, LP (1999) Creating a successful knowledge management system. Journal of Business Strategy 20, 23–26.Google Scholar
Choi, B, Simon, KP and Davis, JG (2008) Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: a complementarity theory-based approach. Omega 36, 235–251.Google Scholar
Dalkir, K (2011) Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, 2nd Edn, Massachusetts: The MIT press Cambridge.Google Scholar
Davis, FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340.Google Scholar
De Long, D and Fahey, L (2000) Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. The Academy of Management Executive 14, 113–127.Google Scholar
Denison, DR and Spreitzer, GM (1991) Organizational culture and organizational development: a competing values approach. Research in Organizational Change and Development 5, 1–21.Google Scholar
Dishaw, MT and Strong, DM (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information and Management 36, 9–21.Google Scholar
Dulipovici, A and Robey, D (2013) Strategic alignment and misalignment of knowledge management systems: a social representation perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems/Spring 29, 103–126.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S and Bartlett, CA (1994) Linking organizational context and managerial action: the dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal 15, 91–112.Google Scholar
Gibson, CB and Birkinshaw, WJ (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47, 209–226.Google Scholar
Goodhue, DL and Thompson, RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly 19, 213–236.Google Scholar
Gray, JH and Densten, IL (2005) Towards an integrative model of organizational culture and knowledge management. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 9, 594–603.Google Scholar
Hansen, MT, Nohria, N and Tierney, T (1999) What's your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review 77, 106–116.Google Scholar
Harrison, A and Hu, Q (2012) Knowledge transfer within organizations: a social network perspective. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4–7 January, pp. 3766–3775.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G (1990) Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Khalil, C and et Dudezert, A (2014) Entre autonomie et contrôle: quelle régulation pour les systèmes de gestion des connaissances. Systèmes d'information & Management 19, 51–76.Google Scholar
King, WR and He, J (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 43, 740–755.Google Scholar
Kuo, RZ and Lee, GG (2011) Knowledge management system adoption: exploring the effects of empowering leadership, task-technology fit and compatibility. Behaviour & Information Technology 30, 113–129.Google Scholar
Lee, S and Kim, K-J (2007) Factors affecting the implementation success of Internet-based information systems. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 1853–1880.Google Scholar
Leonardi, PM and Treem, JW (2012) Knowledge management technology as a stage for strategic self-presentation: implications for knowledge sharing in organizations. Information and Organization 22, 37–59.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, J (2008) Knowledge Retention: Strategies and Solutions. Boca Raton, London and New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Lin, TC and Huang, CC (2008) Understand knowledge system usage antecedents: an integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Information & Management 45, 410–417.Google Scholar
Marwick, AD (2001) Knowledge management technology. IBM Systems Journal 40, 814–830.Google Scholar
McElroy, M (1999) The knowledge life cycle. ICM Conference on KM, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Moreno, V and Cavazotte, F (2015) Using information systems to leverage knowledge management processes: the role of work context, job characteristics and task-technology fit. Procedia Computer Science 55, 360–360.Google Scholar
Nevo, D and Chan, YE (2007) A Delphi study of knowledge management systems: scope and requirements. Information and Management 44, 583–597.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I and Takeuchi, I (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Poston, RS and Speier, C (2005) Effective use of knowledge management systems: a process model of content ratings and credibility indicators. MIS Quarterly 29, 221–244.Google Scholar
Quaddus, M and Xu, J (2005) Adoption and diffusion management systems: field studies of factors and variables. Knowledge-Based Systems 18, 107–115.Google Scholar
Reynaud, JD (1989) Les Règles du jeu: L'action collective et la régulation sociale. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Rodrıguez-Elias, OM, Martınez-Garcıa, AI, Vizcaıno, A, Favela, J and Piattini, M (2008) A framework to analyze information systems as knowledge flow facilitators. Information and Software Technology 50, 481–498.Google Scholar
Rogers, EM (1995) The Diffusion of Innovation, 4th Edn. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ryu, MH, Kim, S and Lee, E (2009) Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user's participation in video UCC services. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 619–632.Google Scholar
Sarvary, M (1999) Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. California Management Review 41, 95–107.Google Scholar
Schein, EH (1990) Organizational culture. American Psychologist 45, 109–119.Google Scholar
Shadbolt, N (2012) Knowledge acquisition and the rise of social machines. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 200–205.Google Scholar
Strong, DM, Dishaw, MT and Bandy, DB (2006) Extending task technology fit with computer self-efficacy. Database for Advances in Information Systems 37, 96–107.Google Scholar
Szulanski, G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 27–43.Google Scholar
Thierauf, RJ (1999) Knowledge Management Systems for Business. London: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
van Rijnsoever, FJ, van Hameren, D, Walraven, PFG and van Dijk, JP (2009) Interdependent technology attributes and the diffusion of consumer electronics. Telematics and Informatics 26, 410–420.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V and Bala, H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39, 273–315.Google Scholar
Von Krogh, G (2012) How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 21, 154–164.Google Scholar
Wiewiora, A, Trigunarsyah, B, Murphy, C and Coffey, G (2013) Organizational culture and willingness to share knowledge: a competing values perspective in Australian context. International Journal of Project Management 31, 1163–1174.Google Scholar
Wiig, K (1993) Knowledge Management Foundations. Arlington, TX: Schema Press.Google Scholar
Yin, RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th Edn. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Zack, MH (1999) Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review 40, 45–58.Google Scholar