Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:12:58.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating the effectiveness of InDeaTe tool in supporting design for sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2020

Shakuntala Acharya Open the ORCID record for Shakuntala Acharya [Opens in a new window] ,
Kiran Ghadge ,
B. S. C. Ranjan ,
Suman Devadula  and
Amaresh Chakrabarti
Shakuntala Acharya*
Affiliation:
Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560 012, India
Kiran Ghadge
Affiliation:
Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560 012, India
B. S. C. Ranjan
Affiliation:
Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560 012, India
Suman Devadula
Affiliation:
Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560 012, India
Amaresh Chakrabarti
Affiliation:
Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560 012, India
*
Author for correspondence: Shakuntala Acharya, E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In today's aggressive global market, innovation is key for success and design solutions require not only to achieve competitive edge, but also to address the growing environmental, social, and economic needs of the community at large. Consideration of these three pillars of sustainability makes a design inclusive, and life cycle thinking is found to be a promising approach across the literature. However, most supports for design address certain facets or aid singular tasks, and the use of design methods and tools, which have the potential to significantly improve the design process, is low due to inappropriate use and selection of these methods. InDeaTe (Innovation Design database and Template) is a holistic, knowledge-driven, computer-based tool for design of sustainable systems, such as products, manufacturing systems andservice systems and has been developed to address and integrate the aspects of sustainability on a singular design platform. It comprises of the generic design process Template that imbibes life cycle thinking into the process by incorporating consideration of every life cycle phase in each design stage, where design activities are performed iteratively. It further supports the design process by aiding the use and selection of appropriate design methods and tools in concurrence with the primary motivation of improving sustainability of the system with the aid of the InDeaTe Design Database. This paper discusses the ontological underpinnings behind the conceptualization of the InDeaTe methodology and the development of the supporting tool. The paper further reports empirical findings from six different case studies conducted for evaluating the effectiveness of InDeaTe tool in supporting design for sustainability (DfS). The results show that InDeaTe tool has potential in supporting DfS.

Keywords

Design methodsmanufacturing systemsproduct developmentservice designsustainability
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 34 , Issue 1: Thematic Collection on “Cognitive and Learning processes for transition to Design for Sustainability (DfS)” , February 2020 , pp. 45 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, S and Chakrabarti, A (2017) Supporting environmentally-benign design: environmental impact estimation and uncertainty categories with respect to life cycle assessment in conceptual design. In International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD 17), Guwahati, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, S, Ghadge, K, Langfitt, QM, Pezeshki, C, Ameta, G, Rachuri, S and Chakrabarti, A (2017 a) Supporting sustainable product design: a case study with InDeaTe tool and template at Washington State University, Pullman, WA. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD'17), Vol. 2, Guwahati, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, S, Ghadge, K, Uchil, P, Flynn, CD, Johnson, AJ, Squier, MN, Yang, Y, Yang, X, Davidson, CI, Ameta, G, Rachuri, S and Chakrabarti, A (2017 b) Supporting sustainable service-system design: a case study on green-roof design with InDeaTe template and tool at Syracuse, New York. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD'17), Vol. 2, Guwahati, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsterdam, MediaLab. (2016) Design method toolkit, pp.12–21. Available at: http://medialabamsterdam.com/toolkit/.Google Scholar
Banfield, R, Lombardo, CT and Wax, T (2015) Design Sprint: A Practical Guidebook for Building Great Digital Products. O'Reilly Media, Inc. Available at: https://designsprintkit.withgoogle.com/Google Scholar
Bhamra, TA, Evans, S, McAloone, TC, Simon, M, Poole, S and Sweatman, A (1999-02) Integrating environmental decisions into the product development process. I. The early stages. Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 1999. Proceedings. EcoDesign'99: First International Symposium On. IEEE, pp. 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bras, B (1997) Incorporating environmental issues in product design and realization. Industry and Environment. Special Issue on Product Design and the Environment, United Nations Environment Programme Industry and Environment (UNEP/IE), 20, 7–13.Google Scholar
Büyüközkan, G, Direllí, T and Baykasoglu, A (2004) A survey on the methods and tools of concurrent new product development and agile manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 15, 731–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, A and Lindemann, U (2016) Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, A, Sarkar, P, Leelavathamma, B and Nataraju, BS (2005) A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. AI EDAM 19, 113–132.Google Scholar
Costa, R, Lima, C, Sarraipa, J and Jardim-Gonçalves, R (2016) Facilitating knowledge sharing and reuse in building and construction domain: an ontology-based approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 27, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N (1993) A history of design methodology. In Design Methodology and Relationships with Science. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N (2000) Engineering Design Methods – Strategies for Product Design, 3rd Edn. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Devadula, S, Ghadge, K, Vishwanathan, S, Chan, SH, Langfitt, QM, Dornfeld, D, Gupta, A, Rachuri, S, Ameta, G and Chakrabarti, A (2017) Supporting social innovation: application of InDeate tool for sustainable service design—case study of community workshop. In: ICoRD 2017, Singapore, pp. 139–151.Google Scholar
Elkington, J (1997) Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, JA (1999) An Introduction to Sustainable Development. 2nd Edn.London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ernzer, M and Birkhofer, H (2002) Selecting methods for life cycle design based on the needs of a company. In DS 30: Proceedings of DESIGN 2002, the 7th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik.Google Scholar
Feng, SC (2005) Preliminary design and manufacturing planning integration using web-based intelligent agents. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 16, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, M (1999) Conceptual Design for Engineers, 3rd edn.London, UK: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghadge, K, Vishwanathan, S, Devadula, S, Langfitt, QM, Chan, SH, Patel, A, Ameta, G, Gupta, A, Rachuri, S and Chakrabarti, A (2017 a) Application of InDeaTe design toolbox for designing sustainable products—case study of a natural water cooler. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD'17), Vol. 2, Guwahati, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghadge, K, Vishwanathan, S, Devadula, S, Langfitt, QM, Chan, SH, Ratnakar, GK, Ameta, G, Gupta, A, Rachuri, S and Chakrabarti, A (2017 b) Application of InDeaTe design toolbox for designing sustainable manufacturing systems—case study of a micro-hydel turbine. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD'17), Vol. 2, Guwahati, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glavic, P and Lukman, R (2007) Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal for Cleaner Production 15, 1875–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardi, P and Zdan, T (1997) Assessing Sustainable Development - Principles in Practice. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Harris, J, et al. (eds) (2001) A Survey of Sustainable Development: Social and Economic Dimensions. Island PressGoogle Scholar
Hubka, V (1982) Principles of Engineering Design. Zurich: ButterWorth.Google Scholar
IAEA (2005) Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IISD definition of sustainable development (2012) Available at: http://www.iisd.org/sd/.Google Scholar
Kelley, T, Woren, D and Kelley, D (2013) Creative Confidence. Books On Tape. Available at: http://www.designkit.org/.Google Scholar
KIID Experience Design Methodology (2014) Available at: http://www.designmethod.korea.ac.kr/ (accessed 12 October 2017).Google Scholar
Kota, S and Chakrabarti, A (2014) ACLODS: a holistic framework for product lifecycle design. International Journal of Product Development, 20, 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Mesa, B (2003) Selection and Use of Engineering Design Methods Using Creative Problem Solving (Licentiate Thesis). Lulea University of Technology, ISSN 1402-1757.Google Scholar
McDonagh, D, Hekkert, P, van Erp, J and Gyi, D (eds) (2004) Design and Emotion. CRC Press. Available at: http://www.designandemotion.org/library/.Google Scholar
Mindmapping.com (2012) Theory behind mind maps. Retrieved from: http://www.mindmapping.com/theory-behind-mind-maps.php. (accessed 12 October 2017).Google Scholar
NIF National Innovation Foundation. Available at: http://nif.org.inGoogle Scholar
Oberender, C and Birkhofer, H (2003) Estimating environmental impacts: the use-phase analysis-matrix—a use phase-centred approach. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, The 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Pahl, G and Beitz, W (1996) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. UK: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponn, J and Lindemann, U (2006) CiDaD-a method portal for product development. In DS 36: Proceedings of DESIGN 2006, 9th Intl Design Conf. Dubrovnik.Google Scholar
PReé Consultants. Available at: http://www.pre.nl/eco-it/ (accessed 12 October 2017).Google Scholar
PReé Consultants. SimaPro. Amersfoort, The Netherlands. Available at http://www.pre-sustainability.com/Simapro/. (accessed 12 October 2017).Google Scholar
Pugh, S (1991) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ritzén, S and Lindahl, M (2001) Selection and implementation-key activities to successful use of EcoDesign tools. In Proceedings of EcoDesign 2001, Tokyo, pp. 174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, T, Man, E and Browne, J (2001) Development of a CAD integrated DFE workbench tool. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 1624. doi:10.1109/ISEE.2001.924496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roschuni, C, Agogino, AM and Beckman, SL (2011) The Designexchange: supporting the design community of practice. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 8: Design Education, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at: https://www.thedesignexchange.orgGoogle Scholar
Roschuni, C, Kramer, J, Zhang, Q, Zakskorn, L and Agogino, A (2015) Design talking: an ontology of design methods to support a common language of design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED15.Google Scholar
Sauer, T, Degenstein, T, Chahadi, Y and Birkhofer, H (2006) A web-based information portal for the early stages of design. In DS 36: Proceedings DESIGN 2006, 9th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar
Singh, RK, et al. (2009) Review “An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies”. Ecological Indicators 9(2009), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, V and Chakrabarti, A (2010 a) An integrated model of designing. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 10, September 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, V and Chakrabarti, A (2010 b) Investigating novelty–outcome relationships in engineering design. AI EDAM.Google Scholar
Strasser, C and Grösel, B (2004) A landscape of methods-a practical approach to support method use in industry. In DS 32: Proceedings of DESIGN 2004, the 8th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar
Sustainable minds (2010) Available at: http://www.sustainableminds.com/ (accessed 12 October 2017).Google Scholar
Uchil, P, Ghadge, K, Acharya, S, Bhinge, R, Robinson, S, Dornfeld, D, Rachuri, S, Ameta, G and Chakrabarti, A (2017) Supporting manufacturing system design: a case study on application of InDeaTe design tool for a smart manufacturing system design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD'17), Vol. 2, Guwahati, IndiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, KT and Eppinger, SD (1995) Product Design and Development, Vol.384. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
UN-CSD (The United Nations Committee on Sustainable Development) (2007) Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. New York: The United Nations.Google Scholar
Usability Professionals’ Association (2005) Usability body of knowledge. Available at: http://www.usabilitybok.org/methods (accessed 12 October 2017).Google Scholar
Vezzoli, C and Manzini, E (2008) Design for Environmental Sustainability. London: Springer-Verlag Limited. ISBN 978-1-84800-162-6.Google Scholar
Vroom, RW and Horváth, I (2014) How are product development and engineering processes enhanced by involving research. Journal of Design Research 12, 2–9.Google Scholar
WCED, U (1987) Our common future–The Brundtland report. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.Google Scholar