Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:17:36.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficient simulation of threshold behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Dominic Kohler
Affiliation:
Energy Management Department, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany
Johannes Müller
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Birgit Obst
Affiliation:
Department of Corporate Technology, Siemens, Munich, Germany
Utz Wever*
Affiliation:
Department of Corporate Technology, Siemens, Munich, Germany
*
Reprint requests to: Utz Wever, Department of Corporate Technology, Siemens, Munich, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The paper discusses a new method for the propagation of risk levels. This discretization takes place by considering the phase space of the state and its subdivision into boxes. In each time step, the method computes the probability of the state being in one box. We start with a variety of technical and physical problems by showing how discrete modeling under uncertainties is technically meaningful and often even problem inherent. Then we select the technical problem of contaminant spread in water grids, to which we apply the method of risk-level propagation in depth. Extensions of the method such as modeling of contaminant mixing at junctions in the discretized phase space and the applicability of conservation laws arise naturally along these lines and are discussed in the context of the general theory.

Type
Special Issue Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkins, P., & Jones, L. (2008). Chemical Principles: The Quest for Insight. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Atkins, P.W., & de Paula, J. (2006). Physical Chemistry, 8th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bakshi, U.A., & Godse, A.P. (2007). The depletion mode MOSFET. In Electronic Circuits. Maharashtra, India: Technical Publications.Google Scholar
Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., & Coornaert, M. (2010). Cellular Automata and Groups. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Dellnitz, M., & Junge, O. (1999). On the approximation of complicated dynamical behavior. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 36(2), 491515.Google Scholar
Dellnitz, M., & Junge, O. (2002). Set oriented numerical methods for dynamical systems. In Handbook of Dynamical Systems (Fiedler, B., Ed.), Vol. 2, pp. 221264. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2009). Towards a More Secure Society and Increased Industrial Competitiveness. Secure Research Projects Under the 7th Framework Programme for Research. Brussels: Author.Google Scholar
Fuks, H. (2003). Probabilistic cellular automata with conserved quantities. Nonlinearity 17(1), 159.Google Scholar
Ghanem, R., & Spanos, P. (1991). Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gilks, W.R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1995). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Hedlund, G.A. (1969). Endomorphisms and automorphisms of the shift dynamical system. Theory of Computing Systems 3, 320375.Google Scholar
Horlacher, H.-B., & Lüdecke, H.-J. (2012). Strömungsberechnung für Rohrsysteme. Renningen, Germany: ExpertVerlag.Google Scholar
Kittel, C. (2005). Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Klostermann, S., Murray, R., Szabo, J., Hall, H., & Uber, J. (2010). Modeling and simulation of arsenate fate and transport in a distribution system simulator. Proc. Water Distribution System Analysis. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Kohler, D., Marzouk, Y.M., Müller, J., & Wever, U. (2015). A new network approach to Bayesian inference in partial differential equations. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Kohler, D., Müller, J., & Wever, U. (2014). Cellular probabilistic automata—a novel method for uncertainty propagation. IAM/ASA Journal of Uncertainty Quantification 2(1), 2954.Google Scholar
Koopal, L.K., & Avena, M.J. (2001). A simple model for adsorption kinetics at charged solid-liquid interfaces. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 192, 93107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasota, A., & Mackey, M.C. (1993). Chaos, Fractals, and Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dynamics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
LeVeque, R.J. (1999). Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhaüser.Google Scholar
Monsorez, A. (2009). Early Warning Systems for Rapid Detection of Deliberated Intrusion: 2.1.1. State of the Art Chemical Sensors for Early Warning Systems. SecurEau. Accessed at http://www.secureau.eu/fileadmin/Secureau/Deliverables_PU/V02_WP2_D2_1_1_SiteWeb.pdf Google Scholar
Niehues, B. (2010). Sicherheit in der Trinkwasserversorgung dvgw-hinweise w 1001 und w 1002. BDEW-DVGW-Jahrestagung. Landesgruppe Mitteldeutschland, DVGW.Google Scholar
Pierce, M.L., & Moore, C.B. (1982). Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxide. Water Research 16(7), 12471253.Google Scholar
Shang, F., Uber, J.G., Rossman, L.A., Janke, R., & Murray, R. (2011). EPANET Multi-Species Extension User's Manual. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Siemens, A.G. (2012). Water Industry—Increasing Efficiency With SIWA Network Management System. Siemens AG, Industry Sector. Accessed at https://w3.siemens.com/mcms/water-industry/de/Documents/E20001-A120-T122-X-7600_WS_SIWA%20NMS_EN.pdf Google Scholar
Thirring, W. (1981). Quantum Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Water Security Initiative—Contamination Warning System Pilots for Water Distribution Systems. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Distribution System Water Quality Monitoring: Sensor Technology Evaluation Methodology and Result, Report No. 600-R-09-076. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2008). Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, 3rd ed. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar