Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Sipahioglu, Isil Ruhi
2012.
Opening the “Black-Box” of Interior Design Education: The Assessment of Basic Design Project Work.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
Vol. 51,
Issue. ,
p.
420.
Oh, Yeonjoo
Ishizaki, Suguru
Gross, Mark D.
and
Yi-Luen Do, Ellen
2013.
A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios.
Design Studies,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3,
p.
302.
Vosinakis, Spyros
and
Koutsabasis, Panayiotis
2013.
Interaction design studio learning in virtual worlds.
Virtual Reality,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
59.
Ciravoğlu, Ayşen
2014.
Notes on Architectural Education: An Experimental Approach to Design Studio.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
Vol. 152,
Issue. ,
p.
7.
Sonalkar, Neeraj
Mabogunje, Ade
Leifer, Larry
and
Roth, Bernard
2016.
Visualising professional vision interactions in design reviews.
CoDesign,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
73.
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Pirita
Härkki, Tellervo
Lahti, Henna
and
Hakkarainen, Kai
2016.
Pedagogical Infrastructures of Design Studio Learning.
Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 2,
p.
155.
Ferreira, João
Christiaans, Henri
and
Almendra, Rita
2016.
A visual tool for analysing teacher and student interactions in a design studio setting.
CoDesign,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
112.
McDonnell, Janet
2016.
Scaffolding practices: A study of design practitioner engagement in design education.
Design Studies,
Vol. 45,
Issue. ,
p.
9.
Adams, Robin S.
Forin, Tiago
Chua, Mel
and
Radcliffe, David
2016.
Characterizing the work of coaching during design reviews.
Design Studies,
Vol. 45,
Issue. ,
p.
30.
Dorta, Tomás
Kinayoglu, Gôkçe
and
Boudhraâ, Sana
2016.
A new representational ecosystem for design teaching in the studio.
Design Studies,
Vol. 47,
Issue. ,
p.
164.
Goldschmidt, Gabriela
2017.
The Active Image.
Vol. 28,
Issue. ,
p.
77.
Oh, Yeonjoo
and
Oh, Youkeun K.
2017.
A computational model of design critiquing.
Artificial Intelligence Review,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 4,
p.
529.
Kang, Hyeonsu B.
Amoako, Gabriel
Sengupta, Neil
and
Dow, Steven P.
2018.
Paragon.
p.
1.
Megahed, Naglaa
2018.
Reflections on studio-based learning: assessment and critique.
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
63.
Lee, Junsuk
Santosa, R.B.
Idham, N.C.
Yuli, N.G.
and
Agustiananda, P.AP.
2018.
Quality Assurance in Architectural Education in Asia – On the Perspective of ‘Design’ Based Architectural Education and its Holistic Assessment.
SHS Web of Conferences,
Vol. 41,
Issue. ,
p.
01001.
Dkhil, Abdellatif
Gardoni, Mickael
Belgacem, Lamine
and
Houssin, Remy
2018.
Product Lifecycle Management to Support Industry 4.0.
Vol. 540,
Issue. ,
p.
715.
McDonald, Jason K.
and
Michela, Esther
2019.
The design critique and the moral goods of studio pedagogy.
Design Studies,
Vol. 62,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Dogan, Fehmi
Taneri, Batuhan
and
Erbil, Livanur
2019.
Use of analogies, metaphors, and similes by students and reviewers at an undergraduate architectural design review.
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
69.
Qureshi, Hira
2019.
Collaborative architectural design studio environment.
Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
303.
Sopher, Hadas
Fisher Gewirtzman, Dafna
and
Kalay, Yehuda E.
2019.
Going immersive in a community of learners? Assessment of design processes in a multi‐setting architecture studio.
British Journal of Educational Technology,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 5,
p.
2109.