Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:12:31.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is Historic Integrity Worth to the General Public? Evidence from a Proposed Relocation of a West Virginia Agricultural Mill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Vishakha Maskey ,
Cheryl Brown ,
Alan R. Collins  and
Hala F. Nassar
Vishakha Maskey
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at West Virginia University in Morgantown
Cheryl Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at West Virginia University in Morgantown
Alan R. Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at West Virginia University in Morgantown
Hala F. Nassar
Affiliation:
Department of Planning and Landscape Architecture at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While historians believe that preserving a historic building in its original location is important to maintain its historic integrity, the general public's opinion is unknown. Survey data were gathered from local residents regarding a proposed relocation of a historic mill in rural West Virginia. Only a minority of the sample population supported preserving the mill at its original location. Willingness to pay for preservation was estimated at $8.45 for a one-time donation for the sample and $2.29 after adjusting for non-respondents using characteristics of the local population.

Keywords

contingent valuationhistoric preservationTobit modelwillingness to pay
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 39 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arabmazar, A., and Schmidt, P. 1982. “An Investigation of the Robustness of the Tobit Estimator to Non-Normality.” Econometrica 50(4): 1055–1064.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2004. “Cost of Restoring a Historic Building, A Growing Problem.” Eye Witness News. Available at www.wfsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=2417731 (accessed October 2004).Google Scholar
Bille, T. 2002. “A Contingent Valuation Study of the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Boyle, K. J. 2003. “Contingent Valuation in Practice.” In Champ, P., Boyle, K. J., and Brown, T. C., eds., A Primer on NonMarket Valuation, The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Carson, R. T., Mitchell, R. C., and Conaway, M. 2002. “Economic Benefits to Foreigners Visiting Morocco Accruing from Rehabilitation of the Fes Medina.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Chambers, C. M., Chambers, P. E., and Whitehead, J. C. 1998. “Contingent Valuation of Quasi-Public Goods: Validity, Reliability, and Application of Valuing a Historic Site.” Public Finance Review 26(2): 137–154.Google Scholar
de la Torre, M., and Mason, R. 1998. “Economics of Heritage Conservation: Issues and Ideas on Valuing Heritage.” A seminar organized by the Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, California. Available at www.getty.edu/conser[-]vation/publications/pdf_publications/econrpt.pdf (accessed May 20, 2004).Google Scholar
Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google Scholar
Freeman, A.M. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Washington, D. C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Garrod, G., and Willis, K. G. 2002. “Northumbria: Castles, Cathedrals and Towns.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Gonter, N. H. 2004. “Historic Hamp House Hits Highway in Relocation.” The Republican Newspaper, September 27, Springfield, MA.Google Scholar
Graham, B.A., Ashworth, G. J., and Tunbridge, J. E. 2000. Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. 2002. LIMDEP Version 8.0 Econometric Modeling Guide (Vol. 2). Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc. Google Scholar
Hanley, N., Schlaper, F., and Spurgeon, J. 2003. “Aggregating the Benefits of Environmental Improvements: Distance Decay Functions for Use and Non-use Values.” Journal of Environmental Management 68(3): 297–304.Google Scholar
Hardesty, T. 2004. Reckart's Mill owner, Preston County, West Virginia. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Hardesty, G. 2006. Reckart's Mill owner, Preston County, West Virginia. Telephone communication.Google Scholar
Hardesty, D., and Little, B. J. 2000. Assessing Site Significance: A Guide for Archeologists and Historians (part of the Heritage Resource Management Series). New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Historic Environment Review Steering Group. 2003. “The Economic Value of the Historic Environment.” In Heritage Counts 2003: The State of the Historic Environment. London, UK: English Heritage. Available at www.englishheritage.org.uk/hc2006/server/show/nav.10748 (accessed May 1, 2006).Google Scholar
Heritage Society of Austin. 2003. “The Castleman Bull House.” Available at www.heritagesocietyaustin.org/cbhouse.html (accessed October 21, 2004).Google Scholar
Hinchliffe, M. H. 2005. “Bruceton Mills Dam, Reckart's Mill Projects on Hold.” Dominion Post, Morgantown, WV, February 14.Google Scholar
King, T. F. 2002. Thinking about Cultural Resource Management: Essays from the Edge (part of the Heritage Resources Management Series). Oxford: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Kling, R. W., Revier, C. F., and Sable, K. 2004. “Estimating the Public Good Value of Preserving a Local Historic Landmark: The Role of Non-Substitutability and Citizen Information.” Urban Studies 41(10): 2025–2041.Google Scholar
Leichenko, R. M., Coulson, E. N., and Listokin, D. 2001. “Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values: An Analysis of Texas Cities.” Urban Studies 38(11): 1973–1987.Google Scholar
Listokin, D., Listokin, B., and Lahr, M. 1998. “The Contribution of Historic Preservation to Housing and Economic Development.” Housing Policy Debate 9(3): 431–478.Google Scholar
Loomis, J. B. 1996. “How Large Is the Extent of the Market for Public Goods? Evidence from a Nationwide Contingent Valuation Survey.” Applied Economics 28(7): 779–782.Google Scholar
Maddison, D., and Mourato, S. 2002. “Valuing Different Road Options for Stonehenge.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
McClelland, L. F., Keller, T. J., Keller, G. P., and Melnick, R. Z. 1990. Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Rural Historic Landscapes. National Register Bulletin No. 30, National Park Service and Interagency Resources Division, U. S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. C., and Carson, R. T. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D. C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Morey, E. R., Rossmann, K. G., Chestnut, L. G., and Ragland, S. 2002. “Valuing Reduced Acid Deposition Injuries to Cultural Resources: Marble Monuments in Washington, D. C.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Mourato, S., Kontoleon, A., and Danchev, A. 2002. “Preserving Cultural Heritage in Transition Economies: A Contingent Valuation Study of Bulgarian Monasteries.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1993. “Natural Resource Damage Assessment Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.” Federal Register 58(10), 15 CFR, Chapter IX. Department of Commerce, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
National Register of Historic Places. 2006. “West Virginia, Preston County.” Available at www.nationalregisterofhis[-]toricplaces.com/WV/Preston/state.html (accessed July 12, 2006).Google Scholar
Navrud, S., and Ready, R. C. 2002. Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
NOAA [see National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration].Google Scholar
Noonan, D. S. 2002. “Contingent Valuation Studies in the Arts and Culture: An Annotated Bibliography.” Working paper, the Cultural Policy Center, University of Chicago. Available at culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/workingpapers/Noo[-]nan11.pdf (accessed July 10, 2004).Google Scholar
Noonan, D. S. 2003. “Contingent Valuation and Cultural Resources: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Cultural Economics 27(3/4): 159–176.Google Scholar
Norton, B. G., and Hannon, B. 1997. “Environmental Values: A Place-Based Theory.” Environmental Ethics 19(3): 227–245.Google Scholar
Pagan, A., and Vella, F. 1989. “Diagnostic Tests for Models Based on Individual Data: A Survey.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 4(0): S29–S59.Google Scholar
Pate, J., and Loomis, J. 1997. “The Effect of Distance on Willingness to Pay Values: A Case Study of Wetlands and Salmon in California.” Ecological Economics 20(3): 199–207.Google Scholar
Pearce, D., Mourato, S., Navrud, S., and Ready, R. C. 2002. “Review of Existing Studies, Their Policy Use and Future Research Needs.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Plum, K. 2003a. “Historic Wheel May be Moved to Bruceton Mills.” The Dominion Post, Morgantown, WV, November 17.Google Scholar
Plum, K. 2003b. “Wise Gives Preston $2M: New Kingwood Pool, Rowlesburg Sewerage Among Projects.” The Dominion Post, Morgantown, WV, November 22.Google Scholar
Ready, R. C., and Navrud, S. 2002. “Why Value Cultural Heritage?” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Riganti, P., and Willis, K. G. 2002. “Component and Temporal Value Reliability in Cultural Goods: The Case of Roman Imperial Remains Near Naples.” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, R., Collins, A., and Svetlik, J. 2005. “Private Provision of a Public Good: Willingness to Pay for Privately Stocked Trout.” Society and Natural Resources 18(1): 75–87.Google Scholar
Santagata, W., and Signorello, G. 2002. “Individual Preferences and Allocation Mechanisms for a Cultural Public Good: ‘Napoli Musei Aperti.’” In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. C., eds., Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. V., and Millerick, C.A. 1991. “The Impact of Historic District Designation on Property Values: An Empirical Study, Research and Practice.” Economic Development Quarterly 5(4): 301–312.Google Scholar
Stomberg, B. E., Barenklau, K.A., and Bishop, R. C. 2001. “Non-Point Source Pollution and Present Values: A Contingent Valuation Study of Lake Mendota.” Review of Agricultural Economics 23(1): 120–132.Google Scholar
U. S. Census Bureau. 2006. “State and County Quick Facts.” Available at www.quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/ (accessed June 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Ward, K. M., and Duffield, J. W. 1992. Natural Resource Damages: Law and Economics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar