Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:11:40.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Can We Learn about Shale Gas Development from Land Values? Opportunities, Challenges, and Evidence from Texas and Pennsylvania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Jeremy G. Weber*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Public and International Affairs and Department of Economics at University of Pittsburgh
Claudia Hitaj
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service
*
Correspondence: Jeremy G. Weber ▪ Graduate School of Public and International Affairs and Department of Economics ▪ University of Pittsburgh ▪ 3804 Posvar Hall ▪ Pittsburgh, PA 15261 ▪ Phone 412.648.2650 ▪ Email [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

We study farm real estate values in the Barnett shale (Texas) and the northeastern part of the Marcellus shale (Pennsylvania and New York). We find that shale gas development caused appreciation in real estate values in both areas but the effect was much larger for the Marcellus, suggesting broader ownership of oil and gas rights by surface owners. In both regions, the greatest appreciation occurred when land was leased for drilling, not when drilling and production boomed. We find evidence that effects vary by farm type, which may reflect correlation between farm type and ownership of oil and gas rights.

Type
Selected Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bamberger, M. and Oswald, R.E. 2012. “Impacts of Gas Drilling on Human and Animal Health.New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 22(1): 5177.Google ScholarPubMed
Black, D. McKinnish, T. and Sanders, S. 2005. “The Economic Impact of the Coal Boom and Bust.The Economic Journal 115(503): 449476.Google Scholar
Borchers, A. Ifft, J. and Kuethe, T. 2014. “Linking the Price of Agricultural Land to Use Values and Amenities.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(5): 13071320.Google Scholar
Brown, J.P. 2014. “Production of Natural Gas from Shale in Local Economies: A Resource Blessing or Curse?Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 99(1): 119147.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. 2009. Microeconometrics Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service. 2013. “Major Land Uses: Overview.ERS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/major-land-uses (accessed February 26, 2014).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. 2014. “Importance of Mineral Rights and Royalty Interests for Rural Residents and Landowners.Choices 29(4).Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, S. and Klaiber, H.A. 2014. “Is the Shale Energy Boom a Bust for Nearby Residents? Evidence from Housing Values in Pennsylvania.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(1): 4366.Google Scholar
Hill, E.L. 2013. “Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Infant Health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.” Working Paper 2012-12, Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Marchand, J. 2012. “Local Labor Market Impacts of Energy Boom-Bust-Boom in Western Canada.Journal of Urban Economics 71(1): 165174.Google Scholar
Muehlenbachs, L. Spiller, E. and Timmins, C. 2013. “The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development.” Discussion paper 13-39, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
New York City Department of Environmental Protection. 2009. “Department of Environmental Protection Calls for Prohibition on Drilling in the New York City Watershed.” Available at www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/press_releases/09-15pr.shtml (accessed February 26, 2014).Google Scholar
Olmstead, S.M. Muehlenbachs, L.A. Shih, J.S. Chu, Z. and Krupnick, A. 2013. “Shale Gas Development Impacts on Surface Water Quality in Pennsylvania.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(13): 49624967.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2014. “Oil and Gas Reports.” PDEP, Harrisburg, PA. Available at www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/oil_and_gas_reports/20297 (accessed February 26, 2014).Google Scholar
Pepe, R.P. 2009. “Real Property Taxation of the Marcellus Shale and Other Mineral Interests in Pennsylvania.Oil and Gas/Real Estate Alert, K&L Gates LLP, Boston, MA. Available at www.klgates.com/files/tempFiles/dbdde4c2-7179-4cb8-ba88-f243fal4a57e/4-17-09-Real_Property_Tax_Marcellus_Shale_Alert.pdf (accessed January 2014).Google Scholar
Pope, C.A. and Goodwin, H.L. Jr. 1984. “Impacts of Consumptive Demand on Rural Land Values.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(5): 750754.Google Scholar
Seeley, R. 2014. “BP Plans to Exit Utica Shale.The Oil and Gas Journal, May 14.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Various years. “Census of Agriculture.” National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Weber, J.G. 2012. “The Effects of a Natural Gas Boom on Employment and Income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming.Energy Economics 34(5): 15801588.Google Scholar
Weber, J.G. 2014. “A Decade of Natural Gas Development: The Makings of a Resource Curse?Resource and Energy Economics 37: 168183.Google Scholar
Weber, J.G. Brown, J.P. and Pender, J. 2013. “Rural Wealth Creation and Emerging Energy Industries: Lease and Royalty Payments to Farm Households and Businesses.” Working paper RWP 13-07, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
Weber, J.G. Burnett, J.W. and Xiarchos, I.M. 2014. “Shale Gas Development and Housing Values over a Decade: Evidence from the Barnett Shale.” Working paper 14-165, U.S. Association for Energy Economics, Cleveland, OH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilber, T. 2012. Under the Surface: Frackinq, Fortunes, and the Fate of the Marcellus Shale. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press Google Scholar