Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:10:08.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Voluntary Approaches to Transitioning from Competitive Fisheries to Rights-Based Management: Bringing the Field into the Lab

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Gunnar Knapp
Affiliation:
Economics in the Department of Economics at the University of Alaska Anchorage
James J. Murphy
Affiliation:
Economics in the Department of Economics at the University of Alaska Anchorage

Abstract

This paper describes a novel experiment designed to examine how rent dissipation may occur in fisheries in which the right to participate is limited and fishermen compete amongst themselves for shares of an exogenous total allowable catch. We demonstrate that rent dissipation may occur through multiple mechanisms, and that the heterogeneity of fishermen has important implications for how rent dissipation occurs and the extent to which different individuals may benefit from the implementation of rights-based management. We apply this approach to investigate the concept of voluntary rights-based management under which managers divide the total allowable catch between two separate fisheries, and fishermen may choose between fishing for a guaranteed individual harvest quota and competing for a share of the total catch in a competitive fishery.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gordon, H.S. 1954. “The Economic Theory of a Common Property Resource: The Fishery.Journal of Political Economy 62(2): 124142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grader, Z. 2002. “An Open Letter to Members of the West Coast Congressional Delegation Regarding Individual Fishing Quotas (IHQs).” Letter submitted on behalf of Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (October 7). Available at http://www.pcffa.org/IFQLetter.htm (accessed November 17, 2009).Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.Science 162(3859): 12431248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, G.W., and List, J.A. 2004. “Field Experiments.Journal of Economic Literature 42(4): 10091055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, F.R., and Wilen, J.E. 2005. “Markets and Rent Dissipation in Regulated Open Access Fisheries.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49(2): 381404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M. 1998. “Nash as an Organizing Principle in the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence.Experimental Economics 1(3): 191206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, G. 2008. “The Chignik Salmon Cooperative.” In Townsend, R., Shotton, R., and Uchida, H., eds., Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 504, Fisheries Division, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/al497e/al497e29.pdf (accessed January 5, 2010).Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2006. “The Value-Added of Laboratory Experiments for the Study of Institutions and Common-Pool Resources.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61(2): 149163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, R., Shotton, R., and Uchida, H. (eds). 2008. Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 504, Fisheries Division, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1497e/a1497e00.htm (accessed January 5, 2010).Google Scholar
Wilen, J.E. 2004. “Property Rights and the Texture of Rents in Fisheries.” In Leal, D., ed., Evolving Property Rights in Marine Fisheries. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar