Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:21:10.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in Environmental Regulations in California and Effects on Dairy Location

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Stacy Sneeringer  and
Regina Hogle
Stacy Sneeringer
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Wellesley College in Wellesley, Massachusetts
Regina Hogle
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Wellesley College in Wellesley, Massachusetts
Get access

Abstract

In recent decades, urban encroachment and increasing environmental regulation have impacted California's dairy industry. A complicated set of environmental legislation affects dairies in the state, and can differ depending on location, creating the possibility for within-state pollution havens. This article details the regional, state, and federal environmental regulation of California's dairy industry, and examines data to see if it matches a hypothesis of regulation affecting dairy location. Using county-year data, we show evidence of changing dairy location within the state matching times of local legislative action. The Central Valley gained production, while the more regulated and urban-affected Los Angeles area lost. Large dairies have increased by 150 percent in the Central Valley, even as the number of small farms in the region declined by 40 percent. More rigorous analysis is necessary to discern the relative impacts of land prices and regulation on dairy location.

Keywords

pollution havenCaliforniadairyenvironmental regulation
Type
Invited Paper
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , October 2008 , pp. 133 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, C. W., Lanyon, L. E., and Hallberg, M. C. 1995. “What We Know About Historical Trends in Firm Location Decisions and Regional Shifts: Policy Issues for an Industrializing Animal Sector.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(5): 1229–1236.Google Scholar
Bath, D. 1969. “Feeding Dairy Cows in Drylot.” Journal of Dairy Science 52(6): 876–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Vence, and Associates. 2003. “Task 2 Report: Evaluate Title 27 Effectiveness to Protect Groundwater.” In Review of Animal Waste Management Regulations. San Jose State University Foundation, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
Butler, L. J., and Ekboir, J. 1997. “Appropriate Market Key to Dairying in Imperial Valley.” Feedstuffs 69(40): 16–29.Google Scholar
Butler, L. J., and Wolf, C. A. 2000. “California Dairy Production: Unique Policies and Natural Advantages.” Research in Rural Sociology 8: 141–161.Google Scholar
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. 2007. “Consideration of Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Existing Milk Cow Dairies.” Staff report. Available at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/board_decisions/tentative_orders/0705/dairies/dairies-general-stfrpt.pdf/ (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. 2008. “Confined Animal Facilities.” Available at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/dairies/ (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. 1999. “General Waste Discharge Requirements for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (Dairies and Related Facilities) Within the Santa Ana Region.” Available at http://www.epa.gov/region09/animalwaste/generalfact.pdf/ (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar
California RWQCB [see California Regional Water Quality Control Board, various regions].Google Scholar
California State Water Resource Control Board. 1991. “Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activities Excluding Construction Activities.” Water Quality Order 91-13-DWQ. Available at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/pro[-]grams/stormwater/docs/91_13_dwq.pdf (accessed August 1, 2008).Google Scholar
California State Water Resource Control Board. 2007. “Water Board Function: Confined Animal Facilities Regulation.” Available at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/docs/majorfunctions/confined_animals.pdf (accessed July 24, 2008).Google Scholar
Copeland, C. 1999. “The Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Program: Status and Legislative Issues.” CRS Report No. RS20232, Congressional Research Service, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Copeland, C., and Zinn, J. 1998. “Animal Waste Management and the Environment: Background for Current Issues.” CRS Report No. 98-451, Congressional Research Service, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
EPA [see U. S. Environmental Protection Agency].Google Scholar
FAO [see Food and Agriculture Administration].Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Administration (FAO). 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. FAO, Rome. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a0701e/a0701e.pdf (accessed July 27, 2008).Google Scholar
Funderburk, W. W., and Blinderman, J. L. 1993. “California's Storm Water Regulation: A Practical Review of the Regulations and Their Enforcement.” In California Environmental Law Reporter. Matthew Bender & Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Gollehon, N., and Caswell, M. 2000. “Confined Animal Production Poses Manure Management Problems.” In Agricultural Outlook (September), Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Guthey, G. T., Gwin, L., and Fairfax, S. 2003. “Creative Preservation in California's Dairy Industry.” Geographical Review 93(2): 171–192.Google Scholar
Herath, D., Weersink, A., and Carpentier, C. L. 2005. “Spatial Dynamics of the Livestock Sector in the United States: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(1): 45–68.Google Scholar
Huang, W., Magleby, R., and Christensen, L. 2005. “Economic Impacts of EPA's Manure Application Regulations on Dairy Farms with Lagoon Liquid Systems in the Southwest Region.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(1): 209–228.Google Scholar
Isik, M. 2004. “Environmental Regulation and the Spatial Structure of the U. S. Dairy Sector.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(4): 949–962.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, S. 2004. “California Land Values Are on Upward Trend.” Ag-Alert (May 5), California Farm Bureau Federation, Sacramento, CA. Available at http://www.cfbf.com/agalert/AgAlertStory.cfm?ID=83&ck=FE9FC289C3FF0AF142B6D3BEAD98A923.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J. M., O’Donoghue, E. J., McBride, W. D., Nehring, R. F., Sandretto, C. L., and Mosheim, R. 2007. “Profits, Costs, and the Changing Structure of Dairy Farming.” In Economic Research Service Report No. 47, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Marsh, M. 2007. “Fee-for-Environmental Services Organization Created to Meet Dairy Challenges.” Western United Dairymen Press Release. Available at http://www.wuenvi[-]ronmental.com/WUD%20Enviro%20Services%20created.pdf (accessed July 25, 2008).Google Scholar
Medvitz, A. G., Sokolow, A. D., and Lemp, C. (eds.). 1999. “California Farmland and Urban Pressures: Statewide and Regional Perspectives.” Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Davis, CA. Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. 2000. “State Legislation Regulating Animal Manure Management.” Review of Agricultural Economics 22(2): 519–532.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2002. “Big Environmental Rule Changes Expected for Dairies in December.” Hoard's West (September 25, 2002): W120–W121.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2003. “Central California Dairies Face New Environmental Deadlines.” Hoard's West (March 25): W-40-44.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2005. “A New Wrinkle in CAFO Rules.” Hoard's West (April): W-68-69.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2007. “Strict New Rules in Central California Dairy Water Quality Regulatory Process.” Hoard's West 152(12): W-108.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. M., Garnett, I., and Guthrie, J. C. 1997. “A Survey of Dairy Manure Management Practices in California.” Journal of Dairy Science 80(8): 1841–1845.Google Scholar
Molloy, T. 2004. “Pollution Rules Targeting Manure Could Force Dairies to Relocate.” Associated Press (June 29).Google Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2008. “Coastal Nonpoint Program Approval Findings.” Available at http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/nonpoint/pro_approve.html/ (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar
NOAA [see National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration].Google Scholar
Oncken, J. 2008. “Dairy Farming, California Style, Is Here to Stay.” The Capital Times. Available at http://www.madison.com/tct/business/oncken/273658 (accessed July 25, 2008).Google Scholar
Payne, M. 2008. “Dairy Partnership Receives California's Highest Environmental Award.” Agribusiness Dairyman (January).Google Scholar
Rollings-McDonald, K. 2003. “Agenda Item #6: LAFCO #2908: City of Chino Annexation No. 2001-01 (Subarea 2—Agricultural Preserve).” Local Agency Formation Commission County of San Bernardino (May 9).Google Scholar
Ruffolo, J. 1999. TMDLs: The Revolution in Water Quality Regulation. California Research Bureau, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. 2005. “Air District Issues: Science-Based Dairy Pollution Estimate.” San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Fresno, CA. Google Scholar
Shultz, T. 2000. “The Dairy Industry in Tulare County.” University of California Cooperative Extension. Available at http://cetulare.ucdavis.edu/pubdairy/industry.pdf.Google Scholar
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2004. “AQMD Adopts First-Ever Measure to Reduce Dairy Emissions.” Available at http://www.aqmd.gov/newsl/2004/bs8_06_04.html/ (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar
Sterngold, J. 1999. “Urban Sprawl Benefits Dairies in California.” New York Times (October 22, p. A14).Google Scholar
Stirm, J. E. W., and St. Pierre, N. R. 2003. “Identification and Characterization of Location Decision Factors for Relocating Dairy Farms.” Journal of Dairy Science 86(11): 3473–3487.Google Scholar
Thome, P. S. 2002. “Air Quality Issues.” In Iowa Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Air Quality Study. Iowa State University and the University of Iowa Study Group. Available online at http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/ehsrc/CAFOstudy.htm/ (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar
Tillison, J. 2006. “Environmental and Immigration Issues Affect the West.” Hoard's Dairymen 1: 24–25.Google Scholar
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2003. “Producers’ Compliance Guide for CAFOs.” Report No. EPA 821/R-03/010, EPA, Washington, D. C. Available at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/cafo_prod_guide_entire_doc.pdf (accessed July 24, 2008).Google Scholar
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005. “The National Coastal Condition Report II.” Report No. EPA 620/R-03/002, EPA, Washington, D. C. Available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/nccr/ (accessed July 28, 2007).Google Scholar
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2006. “Animal Feeding Operations Air Agreements.” EPA, Washington, D. C. Available at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/agreements/caa/cafo-agr-0604.html (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2007. “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System: Overview.” EPA, Washington, D. C. Available online at http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/ (accessed July 28, 2008).Google Scholar