Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:59:57.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twelve-month and Nine-month Agricultural Economics Faculty Salaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Lynn W. Robbins  and
Michael R. Reed
Lynn W. Robbins*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics Department at University of Kentucky, Lexington
Michael R. Reed
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics Department at University of Kentucky, Lexington
*
Correspondence: Department of Agricultural Economics ▪ University of Kentucky ▪ 319 Charles E. Barnhart Building ▪ Lexington, KY 40546-0276 ▪ Phone 859.257.7286 ▪ Email[email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ever more agricultural economics departments are offering appointments for nine rather than twelve months but little if any analysis of the impact of this change has been done. Our research shows that converting to nine-month contracts is an effective way to raise salaries without an initial outlay of new funds and thus meets the retention criterion. Lower ranks do not suffer significantly lower salaries (without supplements) and professors earn more. Because the nine-month alternative costs more, justification for converting all twelve-month faculty members must rest on other factors, such as enhanced grants or comparability.

Keywords

budget managementconverting faculty appointmentsenhancing grantsfaculty salarieshiringretentionsalariestwelve-month and nine-month appointments
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 561 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Golden, B., Tsoodle, L., Odeh, O., and Featherstone, A. 2005. “Determinants of Ag Econ Faculty Salaries: A Quarter Century Later.” Selected paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting in Little Rock, Arkansas. Available at http://purl.umn.edu/35651.Google Scholar
Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education (KCPE). 2005. “Benchmark Selections.” Executive Committee, KCPE, Frankfort, KY. Available at http://cpe.ky.gov/nr/rdonlyres/92a3e872-3c5d-4a7e-8623-7b799b8599cd/0/20050516_benchmarkselections.pdf.Google Scholar
Perry, Gregory M. 2004. “Ranking M.S. and Ph.D. Programs in Agricultural Economics—Spring 2004.” Working paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University. Available at http://arec.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/faculty/perry/Ranking2004.pdf.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. 1993. “Quality of Professional Life—Nine Appointments: Discussion.” Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics 25(1): 52–56.Google Scholar
Trapp, J. 1993. “Quality of Professional Life: Faculty Compensation and Appointments.” Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics 25(1): 27–51.Google Scholar