Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:39:46.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Media Allocation of Generic Fluid Milk Advertising Expenditures: The Case of New York State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Diansheng Dong ,
Todd M. Schmit  and
Harry M. Kaiser
Diansheng Dong
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, in Washington D.C.
Todd M. Schmit
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York
Harry M. Kaiser
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York
Get access

Abstract

A fixed-effects panel data demand model for five New York State markets is estimated to determine the differential impacts of generic fluid milk advertising by media type. Empirical results indicate that among the four media outlets, television advertising has the largest impact on per capita demand, followed by radio, outdoor, and print. Based on the estimated media-specific elasticities, media reallocation of advertising expenditures suggests that milk sales could increase significantly. The results indicate that cooperative media plan strategies developed between the New York regional advertising program and the national advertising programs would achieve the greatest benefits.

Keywords

generic advertisingmilkoptimal media allocationpanel data
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , October 2007 , pp. 253 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chang, H., and Kinnucan, H.W. 1991. “Economic Effects of an Advertising Excise Tax.” Agribusiness 7(2): 165–173.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, C., and Kaiser, H.M. 2000. “Determinants of Temporal Variations in Generic Advertising Effectiveness.” Agribusiness 16(2): 197–214.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. 1976. “Econometric Measurement of the Duration of Advertising Effect on Sales.” Journal of Marketing Research 13(4): 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. 1992. “A Rotterdam Model Incorporating Advertising Effects: The Case of Canadian Fats and Oils.” In Kinnucan, H., Thompson, S.R., and Chang, H., eds., Commodity Advertising and Promotion. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.M., and Reberte, J.C. 1996. “Impact of Generic Advertising for Fluid Milk on Demand for Whole, Lowfat, and Skim Milks.” Journal of Dairy Science 79(12): 2284–2291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., and Thomas, M. 1997. “Optimal Media Allocation Decisions for Generic Advertisers.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 48(3): 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, J., Kaiser, H.M., and Chung, C. 1998. “Economic Analysis of Generic Milk Advertising Impacts on Markets in New York State.” Agribusiness 14(1): 73–83.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, R.P. 1995. “Generalizing What Is Known about Temporal Aggregation and Advertising Carryover.” Marketing Science 14(3): G141–G150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, J.G., Liu, D.J., and Kaiser, H.M. 1998. “Optimal Choice of Generic Milk Advertising Expenditures by Media Outlet.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23(1): 155–169.Google Scholar
Rao, C.R. 1973. Linear Statistics Inference and Its Applications. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vande Kamp, P.R., and Kaiser, H.M. 1999. “Irreversibility in Advertising-Demand Response Functions: An Application to Milk.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(2): 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar