Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:43:56.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrialization of U.S. Agriculture: Policy, Research, and Education Needs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Peter J. Barry
Peter J. Barry*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Abstract

The industrialization of agriculture refers to the continued consolidation of farms and to the growing use of production and marketing contracts and vertical integration among input suppliers, lenders, agricultural producers, processors, and distributors of food and fiber products, domestically and globally. Industrialization is strongly affecting the structure and performance of farms and agribusiness firms; the distribution of risk, returns, and the ownership and control of resources in the food and fiber system; locations of production; competitiveness in international markets; the effectiveness of agricultural policy; business activity, income, family welfare and employment in rural communities; and environmental quality and control. Research is urgently needed to measure these effects, understand the complex underlying factors, and evaluate policy alternatives that influence and are influenced by the industrialization of agriculture.

Type
Invited Paper
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , April 1995 , pp. 128 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkema, A. and Cook, M.L., “The Changing U.S. Pork Industry: A Dilemma for Public Policy,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Vol. 78, No. 2(1993a): 49–66.Google Scholar
Barkema, A. and Cook, M.L., “The Industrialization of the U.S. Food System,” Food and Agricultural Marketing Issues for the 21st Century, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium, FAMC 91–1, Texas A&M University, 1993b.Google Scholar
Barkema, A., Drabenstott, M., and Welch, K., “The Quiet Revolution in the U.S. Food Market,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Vol. 76, No. 3(1991): 25–41.Google Scholar
Barry, P.J., Sonka, S.T., and Lajili, K., “Vertical Coordination, Financial Structure and the Changing Theory of the Firm,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74 (1992): 1220–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breimyer, H.F., Individual Freedom and the Economic Organization of Agriculture, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL 1965.Google Scholar
Coase, R.H., “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica 4 (1937): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council on Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, Industrialization of U.S. Agriculture: Policy, Research and Education Needs, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1994a.Google Scholar
Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics, The Industrialization of Agriculture: A Symposium, 9200 Edmonston Road, Suite 117, Greenbelt, MD, July 1994b.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J.K. The New Industrial State, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 1967.Google Scholar
Hallam, A., ed., Size, Structure and the Changing Face of American Agriculture, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1993.Google Scholar
Handy, C.R., and Padberg, D.I., “A Model of Competitive Behavior in the Food Industries,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53 (1977): 182–90.Google Scholar
Hurt, C., Foster, K.A., Kadlec, J.E. and Patrick, G.F., “Industry Evolution,” Feedstuff, (August 24, 1992):18–9.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W., “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976): 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilmer, R.L., “Vertical Coordination in Agricultural and Food Marketing: Integration,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68 (1986): 1155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J.T., “The Choice of Organizational Form: Vertical Financial Ownership Versus Other Methods of Vertical Integration,” Strategic Management Journal, 13 (1992): 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, Alden, Transition in the Farm and Food System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economics Research Service, 1992.Google Scholar
Marion, B. and the NC-117 Committee, The Organization and Performance of the U.S. Food System, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1986.Google Scholar
Mighell, R.L. and Jones, L.A., “Vertical Coordination in Agriculture,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economics Report No. 19, 1963.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture, OTA-F-272, Washington, D.C. 1986.Google Scholar
Padberg, D.I., Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Padberg, D.I., and Rogers, Richard, “The Cyclical Nature of Politics and the U.S. Food System,” Journal of Food Distribution Research, 1987.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E., Competitive Strategy, The Free Press, N.Y., 1980, Ch. 7.Google Scholar
Reimund, D., Martin, J.R., and Moore, C., Structural Change in Agriculture: The Experience for Broilers, Fed Cattle, and Processing Vegetables, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1648, April 1981.Google Scholar
Rhodes, V.J. and Grimes, G., “U.S. Contract Production of Hogs: A 1992 Survey,” Report 1992–2, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri, 1992.Google Scholar
Schertz, L. and Daft, L., eds., Food and Agricultural Markets: The Quiet Revolution, National Planning Association, Washington, D.C., 1994.Google Scholar
Schrader, L.F., “Responses to Forces Shaping Agricultural Marketing: Contracting,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68 (1986): 1161–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senauer, B., Asp, E., and Kinsey, J., “Food Trends and the Changing Consumer,” St. Paul: Eagan Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Shaner, J. and Goldberg, R.A., Grand Metropolitan … Adding Value to Foods, Harvard Business School Case Study 9-590-056, 1989.Google Scholar
Skees, J. and Swanson, L., “Farm Structure and Local Society Well-Being in the South,” p. 141–157 in Beaulieu, L. (ed.), The Rural South in Crisis, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Sporleder, T., “Managerial Economics of Vertically Coordinated Agricultural Firms,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74 (1992): 1226–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sporleder, T.L., “Agribusiness Marketing Research in a Transition World Economy,” Agribusiness: An International Journal, 2 (1986): 431–42.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture, OTA-F-285, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., March 1986.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Structure Issues of American Agriculture, “Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economics Report 438, November, 1979.Google Scholar
Urban, T. “Agricultural Industrialization: It's Inevitable,” CHOICES, Fourth Quarter (1991): 4–6.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, The Free Press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Who Will Control U.S. Agriculture? Policies Affecting the Organizational Structure of U.S. Agriculture, North Central Regional Extension Publication 32, University of Illinois, College of Agriculture, 1973.Google Scholar