Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:56:05.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Income of Farmers Who Use Direct Marketing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Ramu Govindasamy
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
Ferdaus Hossain
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
Adesoji Adelaja
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
Get access

Abstract

Policy makers are looking for ways to preserve farmlands, especially near urban areas. Farmers are also trying to find ways to increase their farm income by incorporating non-traditional activities into their farm routine. This paper attempts to quantify the contributions of selected nontraditional activities towards farmers’ efforts to enhance their farm income. For farmers involved in direct marketing, a logit model is used to estimate the probability of attaining high income for each activity considered. The results indicate that activities such as agrotourism, direct retailing to consumers, selling of farm related value-added products, greenhouse operations and urban location of farm markets will increase the chance of attaining high income levels.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaja, A. 1995. “Enhancing The Viability of New Jersey's Farms Through Farm Based Recreation and Tourism.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Skylands Rural and Recreational Tourism.Google Scholar
Adelaja, A., Nayga, R.M. Jr., and Schilling, B. 1994. Returns to the Jersey Fresh Promotional Program. A Report Submitted to the Division of Markets, New Jersey Department of Agriculture, Trenton, (April).Google Scholar
Connell, C.M., Beierlein, J.G., and Vroomen, H.L. 1986. Consumer Preferences and Attitudes Regarding Fruit and Vegetable Purchases from Direct Market Outlets. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Bulletin 185 (May).Google Scholar
Cartier, K. 1994. Direct Marketing of Produce: A Study of Farmers Markets in Jackson, Knoxville, and Memphis Tennessee. University of Tennessee unpublished M.S. Thesis.Google Scholar
Eastwood, D., Orr, R., and Brookers, J. 1986. Consumer Stated Preferences for Selected Fresh Produce and Vegetables. University of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Tennessee, Research Report 86-06.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R. 1996a. “Farmer-to-Consumer Direct Marketing: Characteristics of New Jersey Operations.” Paper presented at the 1996 Pennsylvania Vegetable Conference and Trade Show, January 30-February 1, Hershey, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., and Liptak, C. 1997. Quality of Agricultural Produce: Consumer Preferences and Perceptions. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University, Research Report P-02137-1-97.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R. 1996b. “Direct Marketing Operations in New Jersey: The Past and the Present.” Paper presented at the 1996 Mid-Atlantic Direct Marketing Conference and Trade show, February 7-10, Fredericksburg, Virginia.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., and Nayga, R. Jr. 1996. “Characteristics of Roadside Stand Operations in New Jersey and a Profile of the Customers who Frequent them.” Paper presented at the 1996 North American Farmers’ Direct Marketing Conference, February 22-24, Saratoga Springs, New York.Google Scholar
Nayga, R. Jr., Fabian, M.S., Thatch, D.W., and Wanzala, M.N. 1994. Farmer-to-Consumer Direct Marketing: Characteristics of New Jersey Operations. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Publication No. P-02453-1-94, Rutgers University (March).Google Scholar
Nayga, R. Jr., Govindasamy, R., Wall, T., and Thatch, D. 1995. Characteristics of Farmer-to-Consumer Direct Market Customers in New Jersey. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Publication No. P-02136-3-95 (June).Google Scholar
Rhodus, T., Schwartz, J., and Hoskins, J. 1994. Ohio Consumer Opinions of Roadside Markets and Farmers’ Markets. Ohio State University Department of Horticulture.Google Scholar
Schooley, R.E., Bascom, P.F., Conners, D., and Lewis, R. 1989. New York Direct Marketing Survey 1988. New York Agricultural Statistics Service, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
Tavernier, E.M., Adelaja, A.O., and Hartley, M.P. 1996. “Agritourism as an Income Based Strategy for Farm Operators.” Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. 5259.Google Scholar