Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:31:34.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Import Demand for Quality in the Japanese Beef Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Dragan Miljkovic  and
Hyun Jin
Dragan Miljkovic
Affiliation:
Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics at North Dakota State University in Fargo
Hyun Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Economics at Chung-Ang University in Kyunggi-Do, South Korea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The case of reduction in ad valorem tariffs as a trade liberalization policy is considered in this article. It is shown that the reduction leads to a higher quality of imports, ceteris paribus. This hypothesis was tested on the case of Japanese beef imports from the United States and Australia. U. S. beef, according to the results of Gallup surveys, is considered by Japanese consumers to be a high quality product, while Australian beef is considered to be a low quality product. Empirical results support the hypothesis. Moreover, the recent domination of U. S. beef in the Japanese market is further explained by increasingly more efficient U. S. beef production relative to Australian production and a strong income effect, where an increase in per capita income leads to more demand for higher quality products.

Keywords

ad valorem tariffbeef importsJapanqualitytrade liberalization
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , October 2006 , pp. 276 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Marketing Service. 1998. International Meat Review (IMR). Livestock and Grain Market News Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. (September).Google Scholar
Agricultural Marketing Service. 2005. “Mandatory Price Reporting Frequently Asked Questions and Answers.” U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Available at www.ams.usda.gov/lsmn[-]pubs/mpr/Q&A08.htm (accessed December 22, 2005).Google Scholar
Agriculture and Livestock Industries Corporation (ALIC). Various issues. ALIC Monthly Statistics (1991–2002). ALIC, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
ALIC [see Agriculture and Livestock Industries Corporation].Google Scholar
Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. 2005. Available at www.dpie.gov.au/ (accessed January 10, 2005).Google Scholar
Brander, J.A., and Spencer, B. J. 1984. “Trade Warfare: Tariffs and Cartels.” Journal of International Economics XVI,(3/4): 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. L., and Evenett, S. J. 2003. “A Multilateral Framework for Competition Policy?” In Evenett, S. J. and SECO, eds., The Singapore Issues and the World Trading System: The Road to Cancun and Beyond. World Trade Institute, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Das, S., and Donnenfeld, S. 1987. “Trade Policy and Its Impact on Quality of Imports: A Welfare Analysis.” Journal of International Economics XXIII(1/2): 77–96.Google Scholar
Dyck, J., and Nelson, K. 2003. “Structure of the Global Markets for Meat.” Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 785, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank. Various years. FRED data base, Federal Reserve Bank, St. Louis, MO. Available at www.st[-]louisfed.org/ (accessed December 22, 2005).Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. Various years. Various surveys, Gallup Organization, Washington, D. C. Available at http://www.gallup.com/ (accessed January 10, 2005).Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2004. International Financial Statistics. IMF, Washington, D. C. (September).Google Scholar
Miljkovic, D. 2002. “Differential Quality Imports and Per Unit Import Tariffs: A Variation of the Alchian and Allen Theorem.” Paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium General Meetings, Monterey, CA (December).Google Scholar
Miljkovic, D., Brester, G. W., and Marsh, J. M. 2003. “Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Price Discrimination, and U. S. Meat Export Prices.” Applied Economics 35(6): 641–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miljkovic, D., Marsh, J. M., and Brester, G. W. 2002. “Japanese Import Demand for U. S. Beef and Pork: Effects on U. S. Red Meat Exports and Livestock Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(3): 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Various years. Available at www.oecd.org/ (accessed January 10, 2005).Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S., and Rubinfeld, D. L. 1998. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (4th edition). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Reed, M., and Iswariyardi, A. 2001. “Competitive Forces in the Japanese Beef Market.” Paper presented at the symposium of the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium held in Auckland, New Zealand (January).Google Scholar
Reed, M., and Saghaian, S. 2004. “Measuring the Intensity of Competition in the Japanese Beef Market.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(1): 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, A., and Sutton, J. 1982. “Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation.” Review of Economic Studies 49(January): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, M.A. 1975. “Monopoly, Quality and Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics 6(2): 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar