Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:30:27.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Hedonic Approach to Estimating Operation and Maintenance Costs for New York Municipal Water Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Todd M. Schmit  and
Richard N. Boisvert
Todd M. Schmit
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University
Richard N. Boisvert
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University
Get access

Abstract

A hedonic cost function is used to isolate the operation and maintenance costs for water treatments. For small systems, costs are substantial for some technologies, but not for others. When regional differences in input costs are accounted for, small systems located in rural areas may have a cost advantage over similar systems closer to urban centers; however, costs of water treatment to meet Safe Drinking Water Act amendments may still be substantial.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 184 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boisvert, R.N., and Schmit, T.M. 1996. “Distribution of Community Water Systems across the United States with Emphasis on Size, Water Production, Ownership, and Current Treatment.” R.B. 96-17. Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University. October.Google Scholar
Boisvert, R.N., Tsao, L., and Schmit, T.M. 1996. “The Implications of Economies of Scale and Size in Providing Additional Treatment for Small Community Water Systems.” Unpublished report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University. February.Google Scholar
Bruggink, T.H. 1982. “Public versus Regulated Private Enterprise in the Municipal Water Industry: A Comparison of Operating Costs.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 22: 111–25.Google Scholar
Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 1987-92. Survey of Current Business. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Christensen, L., and Greene, W. 1976. “Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation.” Journal of Political Economy 84: 655–76.Google Scholar
Clark, R.M., and Goddard, H.C. 1977. “Cost and Quality of Water Supply.” Journal American Water Works Association 69: 13–15.Google Scholar
Clark, R.M., and Stevie, R.G. 1981. “A Water Supply Cost Model Incorporating Spatial Variables.” Land Economics 57: 18–32.Google Scholar
Energy Information Administration (EIA). 1987-92. “Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Report with State Distributions.” Computer data files. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, S., and Teeples, R. 1983. “Public versus Private Water Delivery: A Hedonic Cost Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 65: 672–78.Google Scholar
Goodrich, J.A., Adams, J.Q., Lykins, B.W. Jr, and Clark, R.M. 1992. “Safe Drinking Water from Small Systems: Treatment Options.” Journal American Water Works Association 84: 49–55.Google Scholar
Holmes, T.P. 1988. “The Offsite Impact of Soil Erosion on the Water Treatment Industry.” Land Economics 64: 356–66.Google Scholar
Logsdon, G.S., Sorge, T.J., and Clark, R.M. 1990. “Capability and Cost of Treatment Technologies for Small Systems.” Journal American Water Works Association 82: 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 1993. “Very Small Systems Best Available Technology Cost Document.” Draft report prepared for the Drinking Water Technology Branch. Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Regional Economic Information System (REIS). 1987-92. REIS Database. CD-ROM. Regional Economic and Measurement Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Spady, R.H., and Friedlaender, A.F. 1978. “Hedonic Cost Functions for the Regulated Trucking Industry.” Bell Journal of Economics 9: 159–79.Google Scholar
Stevie, R.G., and Clark, R.M. 1982. “Costs and Small Systems to Meet the National Interim Drinking Water Regulations.” Journal American Water Works Association 74: 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teeples, R., Feigenbaum, S., and Glyer, D.G. 1986. “Public versus Private Water Delivery: Cost Comparisons.” Public Finance Quarterly 14: 351–66.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Office of Water. 1993a. “Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS-II) Data Element Dictionary.” EPA 812-B-93-003. Washington, D.C. January.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Office of Water. 1993b. “Technical and Economic Capacity of States and Public Water Systems to Implement Drinking Water Regulations.” Report to Congress. EPA-810-R-93-001. Washington, D.C. September.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Office of Water. 1997. “Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey.” Report to Congress. EPA-812-R-97-001. Washington, D.C. January.Google Scholar