Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:26:14.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Country of Origin Labeling in the U.S. Meat Industry with Imperfectly Competitive Processors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Chanjin Chung ,
Tong Zhang  and
Derrell S. Peel
Chanjin Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, Oklahoma
Tong Zhang
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Economics and Management at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics in Chengdu, China
Derrell S. Peel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study examines the impacts of implementing mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) on producer and consumer welfare in the U.S. meat industry. The equilibrium displacement model developed in this study includes twenty-nine equations representing retail-, processing-, and farm-level equilibrium conditions for the beef, pork, and chicken industries. Unlike previous studies, the model allows trade between domestic- and foreign-origin products and considers the imperfectly competitive market structure of meat processers. Empirical results show that without a significant increase in domestic meat demand, producers are not expected to benefit from the mandatory COOL implementation. Results of a sensitivity analysis indicate that consumers tend to bear more COOL costs than producers, as the own-price elasticity becomes more inelastic, and that producers’ benefits increase as the elasticity of domestic demand becomes more elastic with respect to the price of imported products. The existence of market power in upstream and downstream markets of processors negatively affects both consumer and producer surplus. One implication of our findings is that U.S. beef and pork producers’ promotion and advertising programs would be successful in expanding domestic demand when the programs make the own-price elasticity of domestic demand more inelastic and the cross-price elasticity of domestic demand more elastic with respect to import price.

Keywords

checkoffcountry of origin labelingimperfect competitionprice elasticity
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 406 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azzam, A., and Schroeter, J.S. 1995. “The Trade-Off Between Oligopsony Power and Cost Efficiency in Horizontal Consolidation: An Example from Beef Packing.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(4): 825–836.Google Scholar
Brester, G.W., Marsh, J.M., and Atwood, J.A. 2004. “Distributional Impacts of Country-of-Origin Labeling in the U.S. Meat Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(2): 206–228.Google Scholar
Brester, G.W., and Schroeder, T.C. 1995. “The Impacts of Brand and Generic Advertising on Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(4): 969–979.Google Scholar
Carlberg, J.G., Hogan, R.J., and Ward, C.E. 2009. “Game Theoretic Application to Fed Cattle Procurement in an Experimental Market.” Agribusiness 25(1): 56–69.Google Scholar
Chang, H-S, and Kinnucan, H.W. 1991. “Economic Effects of Advertising Excise Tax. Agribusiness 7(2): 165–173.Google Scholar
Chung, C., and Kaiser, H.M. 1999. “Distribution of Gains from Research and Promotion in Multi-Stage Production Systems: Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(3): 593–597.Google Scholar
Dunn, D., and Wilson Gray, C. 2008. “COOL Finally Arrives.” Economic Observations, Cooperative Extension System, University of Idaho, September 17.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D.L. 1997. “Weak Separability and the Estimation of Elasticities in Multistage Demand Systems.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1): 62–79.Google Scholar
Fisher, B.S. 1981. “The Impact of Changing Marketing Margins on Farm Prices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(2): 261–264.Google Scholar
Gardner, B.L. 1975. “The Farm-Retail Price Spread in a Competitive Food Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2): 399–409.Google Scholar
Hayes, D.J., and Meyer, S.R. 2003. “Impact of Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling on U.S. Pork Exports.” Comment submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Unpublished report on file with authors.Google Scholar
James, J.S., and Alston, J.M. 2002. “Taxes and Quality: A Market-Level Analysis.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 46(3): 417–45.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., and Umberger, W.J. 2003. “Estimating Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Country-of-Origin Labeling.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(2): 287–301.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., and Anderson, J.D. 2004. “Effects of Country-of-Origin Labeling on Meat Producers and Consumers.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(2): 185–205.Google Scholar
Meyer, S.R. 2009. “Implementation of Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (MCOOL) in the Pork Industry.” Choices 23(4): 39–42.Google Scholar
Muth, R.F. 1964. “The Derived Demand Curve for a Productive Factor and the Industry Supply Curve.” Oxford Economic Papers 16(2): 221–234.Google Scholar
Peel, D.S. 2003. “A Summary of the Impact of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) on the Mexican Beef Cattle Industry and U.S./Mexican Cattle and Beef Trade.” Livestock Marketing Information Center. Oklahoma State Extension Services in Cooperation with USDA. May 16.Google Scholar
Peel, D.S. 2009. “Implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) in the Beef Industry.” Choices 23(4): 35–38.Google Scholar
Phlips, L. 1983. Applied Consumption Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Piggott, N.E., Zhen, C., Beach, R.H., and Wohlgenant, M. K. 2007. “The Impact of Pork Advertising on US Meat Demand in the Presence of Competing Beef Advertising and Food Safety Events.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, July.Google Scholar
Preston, W.P., and Kim, S. 2009. “USDA Requirements for Implementing Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling.” Choices 23(4): 31–34.Google Scholar
Roh, K., Han, S., and Chung, C. 2007. Economic Evaluation of Korean Beef Checkoff Programs. Korean Beef Checkoff Council, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Schroeter, J.S. 1988. “Estimating the Degree of Market Power in the Beef Packing Industry.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 70(1): 158–162.Google Scholar
Sexton, R.J. 2000. “Industrialization and Consolidation in the U.S. Food Sector: Implications for Competition and Welfare.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(4): 709–720.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 2003. “COOL start-up costs put at $9 billion; AMS issues listening dates, locations.” Feedstuff's, April 7.Google Scholar
Sparks Companies, Inc. 2003. “Cool Cost Assessment.” Prepared for the Sparks/Cattle Buyers Weekly (CBW) Consortium. Comment submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Unpublished report report on file with authors.Google Scholar
Tomek, W., and Robinson, K.L. 1987. Agricultural Product Prices. Second Edition. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Umberger, W.J., Feuz, D.M., Calkins, C.R. and Sitz, B.M. 2003. “Country-of-Origin Labeling of Beef Products: U.S. Consumers’ Perceptions.” Paper presented at the 2003 Food and Agricultural Marketing Policy Section (FAMPS) Conference. March.Google Scholar
USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service. 2003. Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Beef, Lamb, Pork, Fish, Perishable Agricultural Commodities, and Peanuts. Proposed Rule No. LS-03-04. October 28, 2003. http://www.ams.usda.gov/cool/ (accessed January 2009).Google Scholar
USDA, Economic Research Service. 2007. Livestock and Meat Trade Data. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/MeatTrade/ (accessed January 2009).Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Statistical Service. 2008a. Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income, 2007 Summary, Mt An 1-1(08). April.Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Statistical Service. 2008b. Poultry - Production and Value, 2007 Summary, Pou 3-1(08). April.Google Scholar
VanSickle, J, McEowen, R., Taylor, C.R., Harl, N., and Conner, J. 2003. “Country-of-Origin Labeling: A Legal and Economic Analysis.” International Trade and Policy Center Paper PBTC 03-5, University of Florida, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K. 1989. “Demand for Farm Output in a Complete System of Demand Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(2): 241–252.Google Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K. 1993. “Distribution of Gains from Research and Promotion in Multi-Stage Production Systems: The Case of the U.S. Beef and Pork Industries.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(3): 642–651.Google Scholar