Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:14:37.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do Sportfish Consumption Advisories Affect Reservoir Anglers’ Site Choice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Paul M. Jakus
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee
Mark Downing
Affiliation:
Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Mark S. Bevelhimer
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National laboratory
J. Mark Fly
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee
Get access

Abstract

Increasing numbers of freshwater ecosystems have had sportfish consumption advisories posted in recent years. Advisories are sometimes issued in lieu of environmental remediation if they are considered more cost-effective than “cleaning up” the resource, but this approach assumes that anglers adjust behavior in response to the warning. Previous studies, however, suggest that compliance with advisories can be quite low. In contrast, this study measures a statistically significant response by reservoir anglers to consumption advisories. In particular, anglers are less likely to choose to visit a reservoir with an advisory than a similar reservoir without an advisory. Furthermore, the economic losses due to advisories are quantified for anglers in two regions of Tennessee.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, M.W. 1994. “Analyzing the Effect of Site Quality on Tennessee Reservoir Fishing Site Selection Using a Random Utility Model.” M.Sc. thesis, University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
Bockstael, N.E., Hanemann, W.M., and Kling, C.L. 1987. “Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework.” Water Resources Research 23(5): 951–60.Google Scholar
Cooper, W.E. 1995. “Risks of Organochlorine Contaminants to Great Lakes Ecosystems Are Overstated.” Ecological Applications 5: 293–98.Google Scholar
Cunningham, P.A., Smith, S.L., Tippett, J.P., and Greene, A. 1994. “A National Fish Consumption Advisory Data Base: A Step toward Consistency.” Fisheries 19(5): 1423.Google Scholar
Diana, S.C., Bisogni, C.A., and Gall, K.L. 1993. “Understanding Anglers’ Practices Related to Health Advisories for Sport-Caught Fish.” Journal of Nutrition Education 25(6): 320–28.Google Scholar
Eder, T., and Schmidt, W. 1995. “Organochlorine Contaminants in the Great Lakes: The Risks Are Real and Demand Action.” Ecological Applications 5: 298301.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1996. “Environmental Indicators of Water Quality in the United States.” Washington, D.C. Publ. no. EPA 823-C-96011.Google Scholar
ESD-ORNL (Environmental Sciences Division—Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.). 1996. “Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study for the Clinch River/Poplar Creek Operable Unit.” Martin Marietta Energy Systems, ORNL/ER-315/V1. Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Feather, P., Hellerstein, D., and Tomasi, T. 1995. “A Discrete-Count Model of Recreational Demand.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 214–27.Google Scholar
Haab, T.C., and Hicks, R.L. 1997. “Combining Site Choice and Site Preference Data in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hausman, J., Leonard, G., and McFadden, D. 1995. “A Utility-Consistent, Combined Discrete-Choice and Count Data Model: Assessing Recreational Use Losses Due to Natural Resource Damage.” Journal of Public Economics 56: 130.Google Scholar
Krinsky, I., and Robb, A.L. 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4): 715–19.Google Scholar
MacDonald, H., and Boyle, K.J. 1997. “The Effect of a Blanket Sport Fish Consumption Advisory on Open Water Fishing in Maine.” North American Journal of Fisheries Management. Forthcoming.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, H., and Burger, J. 1996. “Fishing in a Polluted Estuary: Fishing Behavior, Fish Consumption, and Potential Risk.” Risk Analysis 16(4): 459–71.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M., and Needelman, M. 1997. “The Welfare Effects of Toxic Contamination in Freshwater Fish.” Land Economics 77(3): 211–23.Google Scholar
Morey, E., Rowe, R.D., and Watson, M. 1993. “A Repeated Nested Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 578–92.Google Scholar
Parsons, G., and Kealy, M.J. 1995. “A Demand Theory for the Number of Trips in a Random Utility Model of Recreation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 357–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, T., Adamowicz, W.L., and Boxall, P.C. 1995. “Influence of Choice Set Considerations in Modeling the Benefits from Improved Water Quality.” Water Resources Research 31: 1781–87.Google Scholar
Shonkwiler, J.S., and Shaw, W.D. 1997. “The Aggregation of Conditional Recreation Demand Systems.” Working paper, University of Nevada. June.Google Scholar
Tennessee Valley Authority. 1995. Riverpulse. Chattanooga, Tenn.Google Scholar
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. 1994. Tennessee Fishing Regulations. Nashville, Tenn.Google Scholar
Velicer, C.M., and Knuth, B.A. 1994. “Communicating Contaminant Risks from Sport-Caught Fish: The Importance of Target Audience Assessment.” Risk Analysis 14(5): 833–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, W.L. 1994. “Reservoir Fishing Benefits across Tennessee Regions.” M.Sc. thesis, University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
Wessells, C.R., Miller, C.J., and Brooks, P.M. 1995. “Toxic Algae Contamination and Demand for Shellfish: A Case Study of Demand for Mussels in Montreal.” Marine Resource Economics 10: 143–59.Google Scholar