Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:32:19.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Changing Rural Policy Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Stephen M. Smith
Stephen M. Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology
Get access

Abstract

A characteristic of our rural policies is that we seem to treat farm policy and other rural policy as if agriculture and the rest of the rural economy and society are separate. Literature from each perspective tends to ignore the existence and context of the other. There has been enough change in the rural context, however, to require a different approach to rural policy analysis and formulation. We must start from a comprehensive view of the rural economy, including both the agricultural and nonagricultural rural economies. The paper discusses issues that have changed the rural policy context: the changed rural economic structure, macro forces, farm-nonfarm interdependence, and the political arena. These changing contexts create new opportunities for rural policy formulation. The paper concludes by suggesting that agricultural economists will contribute more to systematic knowledge and policy formulation if they base analysis on the changed objective conditions in rural areas, and utilize more theoretically-based analysis.

Type
Invited Presentation
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 139 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkley, P.W. “Toward a Development Policy for Rural America.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17, No. 2 (1988): 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D.L., and Deavers, K.L. “Rural Change and the Rural Economic Policy Agenda for the 1980s,” in Rural Economic Development in the 1980s: Prospects for the Future, Brown, David L., Norman Reid, J., Bluestone, Herman, McGranahan, David A., and Mazie, Sara M., eds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Rural Development Research Report No. 69, pp. 1–28, 1988.Google Scholar
Daft, L.M. “The 1995 Farm Bill Environment”, in Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies—1994, Halbrook, Steve A. and Grace, Teddee E., Eds. Oak Brook, IL: Farm Foundation, pp. 37–46, 1994.Google Scholar
Davis, J. “Rural Adjustment and the Research Agenda.” Presidential Address to the Agricultural Economics Society of Ireland, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland. The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, 1993.Google Scholar
Drabenstott, M., and Henry, M. “Rural America in the 1990s”, in Rural America in Transition, Mark Drabenstott and Lynn Gibson, Eds. Kansas City, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp. 85–91, 1988.Google Scholar
Flora, C.B., and Christenson, J.A. “Critical Times for Rural America: The Challenge for Rural Policy in the 1990s,” in Rural Policies for the 1990s, Flora, Cornelia B. and Christenson, James A., Eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 1–17, 1991.Google Scholar
Gardner, B.L. “Changing Economic Perspectives on the Farm Problem.” Journal of Economic Literature XXX, No. 1 (1992): 62–101.Google Scholar
Hallberg, M.C., Findeis, J.L. and Lass, D.A. Multiple Jobholding among Farm Families. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hanson, G. “Value-added income growth in Pennsylvania Agriculture”. Farm Economics. College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, September/October, 1995.Google Scholar
Henry, M.S., “The Rural Economic Gap: Fact or Fiction?”, inGoogle Scholar
Economic Adaptation: Alternatives for Nonmetropolitan Areas, Barkley, David L., ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 9–28, 1993.Google Scholar
Jahr, D. The Rural Political Economy. Washington, D.C.: Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress, July, 1988.Google Scholar
McKibben, B. “An Explosion of Green.” The Atlantic Monthly, 275, No. 4 (1995): 61–83.Google Scholar
Reid, J.N., and Long, R.W. “Rural Policy Objectives: Defining Problems and Choosing Approaches.” In Brown, David L. et al., eds. Rural Economic Development in the 1980's: Prospects for the Future. Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Rural Development Research Report no. 69, 1988.Google Scholar
“Report of the Rural Development Working Group: 1995 Farm Bill” Prepared under the auspices of the National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy and The Hubert Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 1995.Google Scholar
Ross, D., and Friedman, R.E. “The Emerging Third Wave: New Economic Development Strategies.” In Local Economic Development: Strategies for a Changing Economy, Scott Fosler, R. Washington, DC: International City Management Association, pp. 125–137, 1991.Google Scholar
Rural Policy Research Institute (RUPRI). “Opportunities for Rural Policy Reform: Lessons Learned from Recent Farm Bills.” University of Missouri, 200 Mumford Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, 1995.Google Scholar
White, G.B. “Changing Conditions and Emerging Issues for Agricultural Production in the Northeast.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17, No. 2 (1988): 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar