Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:23:16.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Carrot-and-Stick Approach to Environmental Improvement: Marrying Agri-Environmental Payments and Water Quality Regulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Robert C. Johansson  and
Jonathan D. Kaplan
Robert C. Johansson
Affiliation:
Resource and Environmental Policy Branch, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Jonathan D. Kaplan
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, California State University, Sacramento
Get access

Abstract

Agri-environmental programs, such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, provide payments to livestock and crop producers to generate broadly defined environmental benefits and to help them comply with federal water quality regulations, such as those that require manure nutrients generated on large animal feeding operations to be spread on cropland at no greater than agronomic rates. We couch these policy options in terms of agri-environmental “carrots” and regulatory “sticks,” respectively. The U.S. agricultural sector is likely to respond to these policies in a variety of ways. Simulation analysis suggests that meeting nutrient standards would result in decreased levels of animal production, increased prices for livestock and poultry products, increased levels of crop production, and water quality improvements. However, estimated impacts are not homogeneous across regions. In regions with relatively less cropland per ton of manure produced, the impacts of these policies are more pronounced.

Keywords

agricultural sector simulationagri-environmental programsmanure nutrientswater quality
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , April 2004 , pp. 91 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, C., Daberkow, S., Padgitt, M., Smith, M. E., and Uri, N. D. (1997). “Alternative Measures of Pesticide Use.” Science of the Total Environment 203, 229–244.Google ScholarPubMed
Berck, P., and Hoffman, S. (2002). “Assessing the Employment Impacts of Environmental and Natural Resource Policy.” Environmental and Resource Economics 22, 133–156.Google Scholar
Borton, L. R., Rotz, C. A., Person, H. L., Harrigan, T. M., and Bickert, W. G. (1995). “Simulation to Evaluate Dairy Manure Systems.” Applied Engineering in Agriculture 11(2), 301–310.Google Scholar
Claassen, R., Heimlich, R. E., House, R. M., and Wiebe, K. D. (1998). “Estimating the Effects of Relaxing Agricultural Land Use Restrictions: Wetland Delineation in the Swamp-buster Program.” Review of Agricultural Economics 20, 390–405.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. C., and Keim, R. W. (1996). “Incentive Payments to Encourage Farmer Adoption of Water Quality Protection Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1), 54–64.Google Scholar
Fleming, R., Babcock, B., and Wang, E. (1998). “Resource or Waste? The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management.” Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1), 96–113.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI). (2001, July). “FAPRI's Analysis of the EPA's Proposed CAFO Regulations.” FAPRI-UMC Report No. 06-01, University of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
Giannakas, K., and Kaplan, J. (2001, August). “(Non)Compliance with Agricultural Conservation Programs: Theory and Evidence.” Selected paper presented at annual meetings of the AAEA, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Gollehon, N., Caswell, M., Ribaudo, M., Kellogg, R., Lander, C., and Letson, D. (2001). “Confined Animal Production and Manure Nutrients.” Agriculture Information Bull. No. 771, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, S., and Sauer, A. (2003, February). “Awakening the Dead Zone: An Investment for Agriculture, Water Quality, and Climate Change.” Issue Brief, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Horan, R. D., and Claassen, R. (2001). “The Welfare Sensitivity of Agri-Environmental Instruments.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2), 368–386.Google Scholar
Horan, R. D., Shortle, J., and Abler, D. (2003, June). “Coordination of Point-Nonpoint Trading Programs and Agri-Environmental Policies.” Selected paper presented at the NAREA Workshop on Linkages Between Agricultural and Conservation Policy, Portsmouth, NH.Google Scholar
House, R. M., McDowell, H., Peters, M., and Heimlich, R. (2000). “Agriculture Sector Resource and Environmental Policy Analysis: An Economic and Biophysical Approach.” In Barnett, V. (ed.), Environmental Statistics: Analyzing Data for Environmental Policy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. D., Johansson, R. C., and Peters, M. A. (2003). “National Analysis: Industry Effects of Manure Management.” In Manure Management for Water Quality Improvements: Cost of Land Applying Nutrients from Animal Feeding Operations (pp. 62–81). Agricultural Economics Report No. 824, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. L., Lander, C. H., Moffitt, D. C., and Gollehon, N. (2000). Manure Nutrients Relative to the Capacity of Cropland and Pastureland to Assimilate Nutrients: Spatial and Temporal Trends for the United States. USDA/Natural Resources Conservation Service and Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
McDowell, H., Kramer, R., Randall, A., and Price, M. (1989). “An Analysis of U.S. Farm Income Policies: Historical, Market-Determined, and Sector-Wide Stabilization.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 21(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Griggs, R. H., Benson, V., and Williams, J. (1998, September). “Environmental Policy Integrated Climate Model (EPIC).” Online. Available at http://www.brc.tamus.edu/epic/.Google Scholar
Pease, J., Pelletier, B. A., and Kenyon, D. (2001, January). “Poultry Litter Transport Alternatives for Land Application in Virginia.” Selected paper presented at annual meetings of the SAEA, Ft. Worth, TX.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Lewandrowski, J., House, R., and McDowell, H. (2001). “Economic Impacts of Carbon Charges on U.S. Agriculture.” Climatic Change 50, 445–473.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M., Gollehon, N., and Agapoff, J. (2003). “Land Application of Manure by Animal Feeding Operations: Is More Land Needed?” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58, 30–38.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M., Heimlich, R., Claassen, R., and Peters, M. (2001). “Least-Cost Management of Nonpoint Source Pollution: Source Reduction vs. Interception Strategies for Controlling Nitrogen Loss in the Mississippi Basin.” Ecological Economics 37, 183–197.Google Scholar
Risse, L. M., Cabrerea, M. L., Franzluebbers, A. J., Gaskin, J. W., Gilley, J. E., Killorn, R., Radcliffe, D. E., Tollner, W. E., and Zhang, H. (2001). “Land Application of Manure for Beneficial Reuse.” White paper, National Center for Manure and Animal Waste Management, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., Schwarz, G. E., and Alexander, R. B. (1997). “Regional Interpretation of Water-Quality Monitoring Data.” Water Resources Research 33, 2781–2798.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (2003). Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators. Agricultural Handbook No. AH722, USDA/ERS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999). “Unified National Strategy for Animal Feeding Operations.” USDA/EPA joint policy statement, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/finafost.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1999, March). 1997 Census of Agriculture. Pub. No. AC97-A-51, USDA/NASS, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2002). “Fact Sheet: Environmental Quality Incentives Program.” USDA/NRCS, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://www.nhq.nrcs.usda.gov/CCS/FB960PA/eqipfact.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2003). “Costs Associated with Development and Implementation of Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans.” USDA/NRCS report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, World Agricultural Outlook Board. (2001). “USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2010.” Staff Report No. WAOB-2001-1, USDA, Office of the Chief Economist, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). “Environmental and Economic Benefit Analysis of Proposed Revisions to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Regulation and the Effluent Guidelines for Animal Feeding Operation.” Report No. EPA-821-R-01-002, Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002a). 2000 National Water Quality Inventory. Report No. EPA-841-R-02-001, Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002b). “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO)—Final Rule.” Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/afo/cafofinalrule.cfm.Google Scholar