Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:07:43.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Insurance Approach to Risk Management in the Ethanol Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Nicholas D. Paulson ,
Bruce A. Babcock ,
Chad E. Hart  and
Dermot J. Hayes
Nicholas D. Paulson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bruce A. Babcock
Affiliation:
Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa, and director of the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), also at Iowa State University
Chad E. Hart
Affiliation:
Biorenewables Policy division at CARD
Dermot J. Hayes
Affiliation:
Pioneer Hi-Bred International Chair in Agribusiness, at Iowa State University
Get access

Abstract

The vast majority of crop and revenue insurance policies sold in the United States are singlecrop policies that insure against low yields or revenues for each crop grown on the farm. But, increasingly, producer income is based more on the value of crops that have been converted into a value-added product such as ethanol. Moreover, the recent increases in energy and commodity price levels and volatilities emphasize the importance of risk management to ethanol investors. This paper uses an insurance approach to outline a risk management tool which mimics the gross margin level of a typical corn-based ethanol plant. The gross margin, premium, and indemnity levels are calculated on a per bushel basis to enable producers/investors to utilize the product based on their ownership share in the production facility. The fair premium rates are shown to be quite sensitive with respect to corn and energy price levels and volatilities.

Keywords

corn-based ethanolinsurancerisk managementcorrelationMonte Carlo
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , April 2008 , pp. 51 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryan and Bryan, Inc. (BBI). 2000. “Iowa Ethanol Plant Pre-Feasibility Study.” Available at http://www.iowaagoppor[-]tunity.org/ethanolmanual/plant.pdf (accessed March 2004).Google Scholar
Elobeid, A., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D.J., Babcock, B.A., and Hart, C.E. 2006. “The Long-Run Impact of Corn-Based Ethanol on the Grain Oilseed, and Livestock Sectors: A Preliminary Assessment.” Briefing Paper No. 06-BP-49, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
FAPRI [see Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute].Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI). 2007. “U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook.” FAPRI Staff Report No. 07-FSR-l, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, and University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Haas, C. 1999. “On Modeling Correlated Random Variables in Risk Assessment.” Risk Analysis 19(6): 1205–1214.Google Scholar
Hart, C.E. 2005. “Ethanol Revisited (Agricultural Situation Spotlight).” Iowa Ag Review 11(3): 6–7, 13.Google Scholar
Hart, C.E., Babcock, B.A., and Hayes, D.J. 2001. “Livestock Revenue Insurance.” Journal of Futures Markets 21(6): 553–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C.E., Hayes, D.J., and Babcock, B.A. 2006. “Insuring Eggs in Baskets: Should the Government Insure Individual Risks?” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 54(1): 121–137.Google Scholar
Iman, R.L., and Conover, W.J. 1982. “A Distribution-Free Approach to Inducing Rank Correlation among Input Variables.” Communication Statistics: Simulation and Computation 11(3): 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M., and Tenenbein, A. 1981. “A Bivariate Distribution Family with Specified Marginals.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(373): 198–201.Google Scholar
Levy, E. 1992. “Pricing European Average Rate Currency Options.” Journal of International Money and Finance 11(5): 474–491.Google Scholar
Levy, E. 1997. “Asian Options.” In Clewlow, L. and Strickland, C., eds., Exotic Options: The State of the Art. London: International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
Nebraska Energy Office (NEO). 2007. “Nebraska's Unleaded Gasoline and Ethanol Average Rack Prices.” Available at http://www.nol.org/home/NEO/statshtml/66.html (accessed May 2007).Google Scholar
NEO [see Nebraska Energy Office].Google Scholar
Renewable Fuels Association. 2007. “RFA—Ethanol Industry Statistics.” Available at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/statistics/ (accessed March 2007).Google Scholar
RFA [see Renewable Fuels Association].Google Scholar
Turnbull, S.M., and Wakeman, L.M. 1991. “A Quick Algorithm for Pricing European Average Options.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26(3): 377–389.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Various issues. Feed Outlook. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Various issues. Various issues. Feed Situation and Outlook Yearbook. Economic Research Service, Market and Trade Economics Division, USDA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar